The Rise and Fall and Rise Again of Learning Cities

  • Lynette Jordan
  • Norman Longworth
  • Michael Osborne
Chapter
Part of the Lifelong Learning Book Series book series (LLLB, volume 19)

Abstract

The term ‘Learning Region’ is commonplace in the lifelong learning debate. This is logical as they have been a key plank of EC policy – they are the places where lifelong learning is implemented. The EC definition is ‘A city, town or region which recognises and understands the key role of learning in the development of prosperity, stability and personal fulfillment, and mobilises all its resources creatively to develop the full human potential of all its citizens’. These resources include both people and organisations – VET, HEIs, SMEs, local authorities, schools and adult education and non-formal/informal education providers, all key stakeholders in a learning region. Limerick Declaration identified economic, social and environmental indicators distinguishing learning cities and regions. Germany is covered by more than 64 learning regions, UK and Finnish national learning city networks boast 100+ members, and the EC has itself supported projects and programmes to create learning regions, notably the R3L programme, TELS, LILLIPUT, INDICATORS, PALLACE, LILARA, PENR3L and others. All this effort has produced data, tools, indicators, reports, videos, projects, recommendations, plans, strategies and learning materials – a wealth of potentially valuable knowledge for EU regions that urgently needs to be brought together in one place and made available to them. There is a clear qualitative difference in a learning region, and yet research shows that in many places there is little awareness or action. In EUROlocal, PENR3L, a network created by an EC project to spread the learning region message, is leading other networks in gathering together a panoply of European knowledge and practice in this area from sources across all sectors and countries, testing existing tools, finding good practice, dynamically organising it in an interactive website, producing learning materials and actively disseminating and exploit it to effect a transformation of Europe’s regions. This chapter provides an overview and analysis of the current state of play across Europe of learning city/region development and the success of this aspect of bringing learning closer to home.

Keywords

European Commission Lifelong Learning European City Sustainable Economic Growth Learning Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Duke, C., Osborne, M., & Wilson, B. (Eds.). (2005). Rebalancing the social and economic: Learning, partnerships and place. Leicester: NIACE.Google Scholar
  2. Eckert, T., Preisinger-Kleine, R., Fartusnic, C., Houston, M., Jucevičienė, P., Dillon, B., Nemeth, B., Kleisz, T., Ceseviciute, I., Thinesse-Demel, J., Osborne, M., & Wallin, E. (2012). Quality in developing learning cities and regions a guide for practitioners and stakeholders. Munich: University of Munich.Google Scholar
  3. European Commission. (2000). A memorandum on Lifelong Learning Commission of the European Communities Brussels (SEC (2000) 1832 Commission Staff Working Paper). http://www.bologna-berlin2003.de/pdf/MemorandumEng.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2012.
  4. European Commission. (2001a). The local and regional dimension of lifelong learning – A policy paper. Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
  5. European Commission. (2001b, November). Making a European area of lifelong learning a reality. http://www.bologna-berlin2003.de/pdf/MitteilungEng.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2012.
  6. European Commission. (2002, July 20). R3L call for proposals. Call EAC/41/02.Google Scholar
  7. European Commission. (2003, April 7). Information note: The “R3L initiative” European networks to promote the local and regional dimensions of Lifelong Learning, Brussels.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission. (2008). Regional integration for development in ACP countries. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. http://ec.europa.eu/development/icenter/repository/COMM_PDF_COM_2008_604_F_EN_REGIONAL_INTEGRATION.PDF. Accessed 5 Aug 2013.
  9. European Commission. (2011, February 18). Interim evaluation of the lifelong learning programmeFinal report (2007–2013). At http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/evalreports/index_en.htm#educationHeader. Accessed 15 June 2012.
  10. European Commission. (2012). Erasmus for all. At http://ec.europa.eu/education/erasmus-for-all/. Accessed 14 June 2012.
  11. Faris, R. (1998, August 15). Learning communities: Cities, towns and villages preparing for a 21st century knowledge based economy. A report submitted to the Resort Municipality of Whistler on behalf of the Centre for Curriculum, Transfer and Technology, Victoria.Google Scholar
  12. Goncalves, M. J. (2008). Cities and emerging networks of learning communities. Accessed from http://www.afscet.asso.fr/resSystemica/Lisboa08/goncalvesMJ.pdf on 17 June 2012.
  13. Gustavsen, B., Nyham, B., & Ennals, R. (2007). Learning together for local innovation: Promoting learning regions. Thessaloniki: CEDEFOP.Google Scholar
  14. Hamilton, R., & Jordan, L. (2011). Learning cities: The United Kingdom experience. In P. Kearns, S. Kling, & C. Wistman (Eds.), Heritage, regional development and social cohesion (pp. 193–228). Jamtli: Ostersund.Google Scholar
  15. Hassink, R. (2004). The learning region: A policy concept to unlock regional economies from path dependency. At http://www.diw.de/documents/dokumentenarchiv/17/41724/20040510_hassink.pdf. Accessed 22 June 2012.
  16. Longworth, N. (2001). The local and regional dimension of lifelong learning: Creating learning cities, towns and regions, a European policy paper from the TELS project. Brussels: DG Education and Culture.Google Scholar
  17. Longworth, N. (2006). Learning cities, learning regions, learning communities: Lifelong learning and local government. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Longworth, N., & Osborne, M. (2010). Perspectives on learning cities and regions. Leicester: NIACE.Google Scholar
  19. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, & CERI. (1992). City strategies for lifelong learning (An OECD study prepared for the second congress on educating cities in Gothenburg). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  20. Souto-Otero, M., & McCosham, A. (2006). Ex-post evaluation of the R3L initiative: European networks to promote the local and regional dimension of lifelong-learning. Final report to the European Commission technical report. Birmingham: ECOTEC.Google Scholar
  21. Thinesse-Demel, J. (2010). Learning regions in Germany. European Journal of Education, 45, 437–450.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lynette Jordan
    • 1
  • Norman Longworth
    • 2
  • Michael Osborne
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Bachelor of Arts in Community Development (BACD)University of GlasgowGlasgowUK
  2. 2.UNESCO/OECDParisFrance
  3. 3.Centre for Research and Development, Adult and Lifelong LearningUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
  4. 4.Place Management, Social Capital and Lifelong LearningPASCAL ObservatoryGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations