Learning Democracy in Social Work

  • Maria Bouverne-De Bie
  • Rudi Roose
  • Filip Coussée
  • Lieve Bradt
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

At present, an increased feeling of a democratic decline results in a renewed appeal for social work to investigate socialisation for democracy and citizenship. Citizenship as a political concept refers to the citizen as subject with civil, political and social rights. A social conception of citizenship reduces citizenship to civic virtue, defined as the engagement to participate actively in the further development of a model of democracy. Social work has a fundamentally different position in both conceptions of citizenship. It is suggested that in a political conception, social work supports citizens in taking part in the process of democracy, whereas in a social conception, social work becomes a policy instrument focusing on the citizen’s duty to smoothly integrate in the prevailing democratic project and, in doing so, to contribute to social cohesion. In this chapter, we challenge this suggestion. We argue that only in the tension between a political and social conception of citizenship, the educational dimension of social work becomes clear, and it is through this dimension that social work can become a democratic practice. The educational dimension in social work is crucial to conceptualise democracy as an open and ongoing process and not as a predefined project. This argument results from a pedagogical perspective on social work. This perspective enables us to connect rather than oppose social and political conceptions of citizenship. It is in this dialectic tension that we find a meaningful answer to the question of how to relate social work to learning democracy.

Keywords

Social Work Public Debate Private Sphere Civic Virtue Social Sphere 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Biesta, G. (2011). Learning democracy in school and society. Rotterdam/Boston/Tapei: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradt, L. (2009). Victim-offender mediation as social work practice. A comparison between mediation for young and adult offenders in Flanders. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, I., & Pugh, R. (2004). The politics of social work research. In R. Lovelock, K. Lyons, & J. Powell (Eds.), Reflecting on social work – Discipline and profession (pp. 55–71). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  4. Castel, R. (1995). Les métamorphoses de la question sociale. Une chronique du salariat. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  5. Coussée, F., Bradt, L., Roose, R., & De Bie, M. (2010). The emerging social pedagogical paradigm in UK child and youth care: Deus ex machina or walking the beaten path? British Journal of Social Work, 40(1), 789–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Vos, K., Roose, R., & De Bie, M. (in press). Honderd jaar na de kinderbescherming: de institutionalisering van een pedagogische paradox. Panopticon.Google Scholar
  7. de Winter, M. (2007). Opvoeding, onderwijs en jeugdbeleid in het algemeen belang; de noodzaak van een democratisch-pedagogisch offensief. In P. van Lieshout, M. van der Meij, & J. de Pree (Eds.), Bouwstenen voor een betrokken jeugdbeleid (pp. 225–270). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dingwall, R., Eekelaar, J., & Murray, T. (1983). The protection of children: State intervention and family life. Oxford/New York: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Dominelli, L., & Hoogvelt, A. (1996). Globalization and the technocratization of social work. Critical Social Policy, 16(2), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Donzelot, J. (1984). L’invention du social. Essai sur le déclin des passions politiques. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  11. Fook, J. (2002). Social work: Critical theory and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Rickmansworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  13. Harris, J. (2008). State social work: Constructing the present from moments in the past. British Journal of Social Work, 38(4), 662–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jordan, B. (2004). Emancipatory social work? Opportunity or oxymoron. British Journal of Social Work, 34(1), 527–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jordan, B., & Parton, N. (2004). Social work, the public sphere and civil society. In R. Lovelock, K. Lyons, & J. Powell (Eds.), Reflecting on social work – Discipline and profession (pp. 20–36). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  16. Lawy, R. S., & Biesta, G. J. J. (2006). Citizenship-as-practice: The educational implications of an inclusive and relational understanding of citizenship. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(1), 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lemmens, P., & Schaiko, G. (2012). Democracy in Europe, from a human rights perspective. In M. C. Foblets, M. Hildebrandt, & J. Steenbergen (Eds.), Liber Amicorum René Focqué (pp. 391–407). Brussel/Gent: Groep De Boeck/Larcier.Google Scholar
  18. Lorenz, W. (2004). Towards a European paradigm of social work – Studies in the history of modes of social work and social policy in Europe. Dresden: PHD Fakultät Erziehungswissenschaften der Technischen Universität Dresden.Google Scholar
  19. Lorenz, W. (2005). Social work and a new social order: Challenging neo-liberalism’s erosion of solidarity. Social Work & Society, 3(1), 93–101.Google Scholar
  20. Lorenz, W. (2009). The function of history in the debate on social work. In G. Verschelden, F. Coussée, T. Van de Walle, & H. Williamson (Eds.), The history of youth work in Europe. Relevance for youth policy today (pp. 19–28). Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
  21. Lorenz. W. (2011). Social policy, social pedagogy and social citizenship: Pitfalls and promises of an uneasy relationship in an European context. Lecture final symposium Ghent University, Francquichair G. Biesta.Google Scholar
  22. Marshall, T. H. (1950). Citizenship and social class and other essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Marston, G., & McDonald, C. (2012). Getting beyond ‘Heroic Agency’ in conceptualising social workers as policy actors in the twenty-first century. British Journal of Social Work, 42(6), 1022–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mortier, F. (2002). We zijn allemaal kinderen: bruggen tussen rechten voor kinderen en volwassenen. Tijdschrift voor Jeugdrecht en Kinderrechten, 3(extra editie), 10–17.Google Scholar
  26. Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Parton, N. (2000). Some thoughts on the relationship between theory and practice in and for social work. British Journal of Social Work, 30(6), 449–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pasture, P. (1993). The April 1944 ‘social pact’ in Belgium and its significance for the post-war welfare state. Journal of Contemporary History, 28, 695–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pratt, J. (1985). Juvenile justice, social work and social control. The need for positive thinking. British Journal of Social Work, 15(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  30. Raes, K. (2003). Tegen betere wetten in. Een ethische kijk op het recht. Gent: Academia Press.Google Scholar
  31. Roose, R., & De Bie, M. (2008). Children’s rights: A challenge for social work. International Social Work, 51(1), 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Roose, R., Roets, G., & Bouverne-De Bie, M. (2011). Irony and social work: In search of the happy Sisyphus. British Journal of Social Work. Advanced access.Google Scholar
  33. Rosanvallon, P. (1995). La nouvelle question sociale. Repenser l’Etat providence. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  34. Segal, E. A., Gerdes, K. E., & Steiner, S. (2009). An introduction to the profession of social work. Becoming a change agent (3rd ed.). Belmont: Brook/Cole.Google Scholar
  35. Simon, F., & Van Damme, D. (1989). De pedagogisering van de kinderlijke leefwereld. De ‘Ligue de l’Enseignement’ en de oorsprong van enkele parascolaire initiatieven. In E. Verhellen, F. Spiesschaert, & L. Cattrijsse (Eds.), Rechten van kinderen. Een tekstbundel van de RUG n.a.v. de UNO-conventie voor de rechten van het kind (pp. 151–181). Antwerpen: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  36. Stepney, P. (2006). Mission impossible? Critical practice in social work. British Journal of Social Work, 36(8), 1289–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tinnevelt, R. (2010). De politiek van de openbaarheid en de openbaarheid van de politiek. Filosofie, 20(5), 17–24.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Bouverne-De Bie
    • 1
  • Rudi Roose
    • 1
  • Filip Coussée
    • 1
  • Lieve Bradt
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social Welfare StudiesGhent UniversityGentBelgium

Personalised recommendations