Advertisement

The Importance of Knowledge Environments and Spatial Relations for Organizational Learning: An Introduction

  • Ariane Berthoin AntalEmail author
  • Peter Meusburger
  • Laura Suarsana
Chapter
Part of the Knowledge and Space book series (KNAS, volume 6)

Abstract

The birthplace of the field of organizational learning can be traced back to management scholars in the United States who were interested in organizational behavior. Over the years it has attracted researchers from diverse disciplines and from all around the world. It is particularly apt to address the way interest in the field has spread and how it has been populated so far, given that the current edited volume is appearing in the series Knowledge and Space, an intellectual venture launched by the department of geography at Heidelberg University.

Keywords

Organizational Learning Organizational Behavior Office Location Knowledge Environment Creative Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adler, N. J. (1986). International dimensions of organizational behavior. Boston MA: Kent Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, N. J. (2010). Going beyond the dehydrated language of management: Leadership insight. Journal of Business Strategy, 31(4), 90–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler, N. J. (with Gundersen, A.). (2008). International dimensions of organizational behavior (5th ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage.Google Scholar
  4. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  5. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  6. Bertalanffy, L. (1950). An outline of general system theory. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1, 139–164.Google Scholar
  7. Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
  8. Bertalanffy, L. (1976). General systems theory: A critical review. In J. Beishon & G. Peters (Eds.), Systems behavior (2nd ed., pp. 30–50). London: Open University Set Book.Google Scholar
  9. Boden, M. A. (1994). What is creativity? In M. A. Boden (Ed.), Dimensions of creativity (pp. 75–117). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Borchert, J. R. (1978). Major control points in American economic geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 68, 214–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1985). Social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and Society, 14, 723–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7, 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action (R. Johnson, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Canter, D. (1977). The psychology of places. London: Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  15. Canter, D. (1985). Putting situations in their place: Foundations for a bridge between social and environmental psychology. In A. Furnham (Ed.), Social behavior in context (pp. 208–239). London: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  16. Caplow, T., & McGee, R. J. (1958). The academic market place. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Child, J. (2001). Learning through strategic alliances. In M. Dierkes, A. Berthoin Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (pp. 657–680). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, M. D., & Sproull, L. S. (Eds.). (1996). Organizational learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Dicken, P. (1990). The geography of enterprise: Elements of a research agenda. In M. de Smidt & E. Wever (Eds.), The corporate firm in a changing world economy: Case studies in the geography of enterprise (pp. 234–244). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Dicken, P., & Thrift, N. (1992). The organization of production and the production of organization: Why business enterprises matter in the study of geographical industrialization. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 17, 279–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dierkes, M., Berthoin Antal, A., Child, J., & Nonaka, I. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Easterby-Smith, M., & Lyles, M. A. (Eds.). (2003). The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Edenius, M., & Yakhlef, A. (2007). Space, vision and organizational learning: The interplay of incorporating and inscribing practices. Management Learning, 38, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Feld, S., & Basso, K. H. (1996). Introduction. In S. Feld & K. H. Basso (Eds.), Senses of place (pp. 3–11). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  25. Ford, J., & Harding, N. (2004). We went looking for an organization but could find only the metaphysics of its presence. Sociology, 38, 815–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Geipel, R. (1965). Sozialräumliche Strukturen des Bildungswesens. Studien zur Bildungsökonomie und zur Frage der gymnasialen Standorte in Hessen [Sociospatial structures of the educational system: Studies on the economics of education and the siting of secondary schools in Hesse]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Diesterweg.Google Scholar
  27. Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008). Diverse economies: Performative practices for ‘other worlds’. Progress in Human Geography, 32, 613–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gieryn, T. F. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 463–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Glückler, J. (2008a). Die Chancen der Standortspaltung: Wissensnetze im globalen Unternehmen [The opportunities of location-splitting: Knowledge networks in a global enterprise]. Geographische Zeitschrift, 96, 125–139.Google Scholar
  30. Glückler, J. (2008b). Service Offshoring: globale Arbeitsteilung und regionale Entwicklungschancen [Service offshoring: Global division of labor and opportunities for regional development]. Geographische Rundschau, 60(9), 36–42.Google Scholar
  31. Glückler, J. (2010). The creation and diffusion of controversial innovations in the organizational periphery. SPACES online: Spatial Aspects Concerning Economic Structures (Vol. 8, Issue 2010–06). Marburg, Germany: Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Geography. Retrieved from http://www.spaces-online.uni-hd.de/include/SPACES%202010-06%20Glueckler.pdf
  32. Glückler, J. (2013). The problem of mobilizing expertise at a distance. In P. Meusburger, J. Glückler, & M. El Meskioui (Eds.), Knowledge and the economy (pp. 95–109). Knowledge and Space: Vol. 5. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Glückler, J., Dehning, W., Janneck, M., & Armbrüster, T. (Eds.). (2012). Unternehmensnetzwerke. Architekturen, Strukturen und Strategien [Network organizations: Architectures, structures, and strategies]. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Gabler.Google Scholar
  34. Goddard, J. B. (1971). Office communications and office location: A review of current research. Regional Studies, 5, 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goddard, J. B. (1973). Office linkages and location: A study of communication and spatial patterns in central London. Progress in planning: Vol. 1 (part 2). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  36. Goddard, J. B., & Gillespie, A. (1986). Advanced telecommunications and regional economic development. The Geographical Journal, 152, 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Goddard, J. B., Gillespie, A., Thwaites, A., & Robinson, F. (1986). The impact of new information technology on urban and regional structure in Europe. Land Development Studies, 11, 19–30.Google Scholar
  38. Goddard, J. B., & Morris, D. (1976). The communications factor in office decentralization. Progress and planning: Vol. 6 (part 1). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  39. Goddard, J. B., & Pye, R. (1977). Telecommunications and office location. Regional Studies, 11, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gottmann, J. (1979). Office work and the evolution of cities. Ekistics: The Problems and Science of Human Settlements, 46(274), 4–7.Google Scholar
  41. Gottmann, J. (1980a). Confronting centre and periphery. In J. Gottmann (Ed.), Centre and periphery: Spatial variation in politics (pp. 11–25). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Gottmann, J. (1980b). Organizing and reorganizing space. In J. Gottmann (Ed.), Centre and periphery: Spatial variation in politics (pp. 217–224). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Gottmann, J. (1982). Urban settlements and telecommunications. Ekistics: The Problems and Science of Human Settlements, 50(302), 411–416.Google Scholar
  44. Gottmann, J. (1983). The coming of the transactional city. Monograph series no. 2. Institute of Urban Studies, College Park, MD: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  45. Grabher, G. (2001). Ecologies of creativity: The village, the group, and the heterarchic organization of the British advertising industry. Environment and Planning A, 33, 351–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Grabher, G. (2002). The project ecology of advertising: Talents, tasks, and teams. Regional Studies, 36, 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Graumann, C. F. (Ed.). (1978). Ökologische Perspektiven in der Psychologie [Ecological perspectives in psychology]. Berne, Switzerland: Huber.Google Scholar
  48. Graumann, C. F. (2002a). The phenomenological approach to people–environment studies. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 95–113). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. Graumann, C. F. (2002b). Zwischen den Disziplinen. Dilemma und Chancen der Umweltpsychologie [Between the disciplines: Dilemmas and opportunities of environmental psychology]. Umweltpsychologie, 6, 154–161.Google Scholar
  50. Graumann, C. F., & Kruse, L. (2003). Räumliche Umwelt. Die Perspektive der humanökologisch orientierten Umweltpsychologie. [Spatial environment: The perspective of an environmental psychology oriented to human-ecology]. In P. Meusburger & T. Schwan (Eds.), Humanökologie. Ansätze zur Überwindung der Natur-Kultur-Dichotomie. (pp. 239–256). Erdkundliches Wissen: Vol. 135. Stuttgart, Germany: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
  51. Hayter, R., Patchell, J., & Rees, K. (1999). Business segmentation and location revisited: Innovation and the terra incognita of large firms. Regional Studies, 33, 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hayter, R., & Watts, H. D. (1983). The geography of enterprise: A reappraisal. Progress in Human Geography, 7, 158–181.Google Scholar
  53. Hedberg, B. (1981). How organizations learn and unlearn. In P. Nystrom & W. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design (Vol. 1, pp. 3–27). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Jöns, H. (2003). Grenzüberschreitende Mobilität und Kooperation in den Wissenschaften. Deutschlandaufenthalte US-amerikanischer Humboldt-Forschungspreisträger aus einer erweiterten Akteursnetzwerkperspektive [Cross-boundary mobility and cooperation in the sciences: U.S. Humboldt Research Award winners in Germany from an expanded actor–network perspective]. Heidelberger Geographische Arbeiten No. 116. Heidelberg, Germany: Heidelberg University, Department of Geography.Google Scholar
  55. Jöns, H. (2007). Transnational mobility and the spaces of knowledge production: A comparison of global patterns, motivations and collaborations in different academic fields. Social Geography, 2, 97–114. doi: 10.5194/sg-2-97-2007
  56. Kornberger, M., & Clegg, S. R. (2004). Bringing space back in: Organizing the generative building. Organization Studies, 25, 1095–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Krumme, G. (1969). Toward a geography of enterprise. Economic Geography, 45, 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lane, C. (2001). Organizational learning in supplier networks. In M. Dierkes, A. Berthoin Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (pp. 699–715). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  60. Lewin, K. (1951). In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  61. Lipshitz, R., Friedman, V. J., & Popper, M. (2007). Demystifying organizational learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  62. Livingstone, D. N. (1995). The spaces of knowledge: Contributions towards a historical geography of science. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 13, 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Livingstone, D. N. (2002). Knowledge, space and the geographies of science. In D. N. Livingstone, Science, space and hermeneutics (pp. 7–40). Hettner-Lecture: Vol. 5. Heidelberg, Germany: Heidelberg University, Department of Geography.Google Scholar
  64. Livingstone, D. N. (2003). Putting science in its place: Geographies of scientific knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lyles, M. (2001). Organizational learning in international joint ventures: The case of Hungary. In M. Dierkes, A. Berthoin Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (pp. 681–698). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Macharzina, K., Oesterle, M.-J., & Brodel, D. (2001). Learning in multinationals. In M. Dierkes, A. Berthoin Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (pp. 631–656). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Manzo, L. C. (2005). For better or worse: Exploring multiple dimensions of place meaning. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Maskell, P. (2001). The firm in economic geography. Economic Geography, 77, 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Massey, D. (1999). Philosophy and politics of spatiality: Some considerations. In D. Massey, Power-geometries and the politics of space-time (pp. 27–42). Hettner-Lecture: Vol. 2. Heidelberg, Germany: Heidelberg University, Department of Geography.Google Scholar
  70. Matthiesen, U. (2013). KnowledgeScapes: A new conceptual approach and selected empirical findings from research on knowledge milieus and knowledge networks. In P. Meusburger, J. Glückler, & M. El Meskioui (Eds.), Knowledge and the economy (pp. 173–203). Knowledge and Space: Vol. 5. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. McNee, R. B. (1960). Toward a more humanistic economic geography: The geography of enterprise. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 51, 201–205.Google Scholar
  72. Meusburger, P. (1980). Beiträge zur Geographie des Bildungs- und Qualifikationswesens. Regionale und soziale Unterschiede des Ausbildungsniveaus der österreichischen Bevölkerung [Contributions to the geography of knowledge and education: Regional and social disparities of educational attainment of the Austrian population]. Innsbrucker Geographische Studien: Vol. 7. Innsbruck, Austria: Innsbruck University, Department of Geography.Google Scholar
  73. Meusburger, P. (1998). Bildungsgeographie. Wissen und Ausbildung in der räumlichen Dimension [Geography of education: Knowledge and education in the spatial dimension]. Heidelberg, Germany: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  74. Meusburger, P. (2000). The spatial concentration of knowledge: Some theoretical considerations. Erdkunde, 54, 352–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Meusburger, P. (2007a). Macht, Wissen und die Persistenz von räumlichen Disparitäten [Power, knowledge, and the persistence of spatial disparities]. In I. Kretschmer (Ed.), Das Jubiläum der Österreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft. 150 Jahre (1856–2006) (pp. 99–124). Vienna, Austria: Österreichische Geographische Gesellschaft.Google Scholar
  76. Meusburger, P. (2007b). Power, knowledge and the organization of space. In J. Wassmann & K. Stockhaus (Eds.), Experiencing new worlds (pp. 111–124). New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  77. Meusburger, P. (2008). The nexus of knowledge and space. In P. Meusburger, M. Welker, & E. Wunder (Eds.), Clashes of knowledge: Orthodoxies and heterodoxies in science and religion (pp. 35–90). Knowledge and Space: Vol 1. Dordrecht. The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Meusburger, P. (2009a). Milieus of creativity: The role of places, environments, and spatial contexts. In P. Meusburger, J. Funke, & E. Wunder (Eds.), Milieus of creativity: An interdisciplinary approach to spatiality of creativity (pp. 97–153). Knowledge and Space: Vol. 2. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  79. Meusburger, P. (2009b). Spatial mobility of knowledge: A proposal for a more realistic communication model. disP—The Planning Review, 177(2), 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Meusburger, P. (2012). Wissenschaftsatlas of Heidelberg University: An introduction. In P. Meusburger & T. Schuch (Eds.), Wissenschaftsatlas of Heidelberg University: Spatio-temporal relations of academic knowledge production (pp. 12–17). Knittlingen, Germany: Bibliotheca Palatina.Google Scholar
  81. Meusburger, P., Koch, G., & Christmann, G. B. (2011). Nähe- und Distanz-Praktiken in der Wissenserzeugung. Zur Notwendigkeit einer kontextbezogenen Analyse [Practices of proximity and distance in knowledge generation: The need for contextual analysis]. In O. Ibert & H. J. Kujath (Eds.), Räume der Wissensarbeit. Zur Funktion von Nähe und Distanz in der Wissensökonomie (pp. 221–249). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: A synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  83. Moingeon, B., & Edmondson, A. (Eds.). (1996). Organizational learning and competitive advantage. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  84. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Nystrom, P., & Starbuck, W. (Eds.). (1981). Handbook of organizational design: Vol. 1. Adapting organizations to their environments. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Rousseau, D. M., & Fried, Y. (2001). Location, location, location: Contextualizing organizational research [Editorial]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Rowles, G. D. (2008a). The meaning of place. In E. B. Crepeau, E. S. Cohn, & B. A. Boyt Schell (Eds.), Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy (11th ed., pp. 80–89). Philadelphia PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  88. Rowles, G. D. (2008b). Place in occupational science: A life course perspective on the role of environmental context in the quest for meaning. Journal of Occupational Science, 15, 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Scannel, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Stark, D. (2009). The sense of dissonance: Accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  91. Sydow, J. (2002). Towards a spatial turn in organization science?—A long wait (SECONS Discussion Forum, Contribution No. 8). Bonn, Germany: Free University of Berlin, Institute of Business Administration. Retrieved from http://www.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/institute/management/sydow/media/pdf/Sydow-Towards_a_Spatial_Turn_in_Organization_Science.pdf
  92. Taylor, M. (1987). Enterprise and the product-cycle model: Conceptual ambiguities. In G. A. Knaap & E. Wever (Eds.), New technology and regional development (pp. 75–93). London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  93. Taylor, M. (1995). The business enterprise, power and patterns of geographical industrialisation. In S. Conti, E. J. Malecki, & P. Oinas (Eds.), The industrial enterprise and its environment: Spatial perspectives (pp. 99–122). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  94. Taylor, S., & Spicer, A. (2007). Time for space: A narrative review of research on organizational spaces. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Taylor, M., & Thrift, N. (1982). Industrial linkage and the segmented economy, Part 1. Some theoretical proposals. Environment and Planning A, 14, 1601–1613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Taylor, M., & Thrift, N. (1983). Business organization, segmentation and location. Regional Studies, 17, 445–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Thorngren, B. (1970). How do contact systems affect regional development? Environment and Planning A, 2, 409–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Törnqvist, G. (1970). Contact systems and regional development. Lund Studies in Geography, Ser. B, no. 35. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Tsui-Auch, L.-S. (2001). Learning in global and local networks: Experience of Chinese firms in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taiwan. In M. Dierkes, A. Berthoin Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (pp. 716–732). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  100. Turner, B. (1971). Exploring the industrial subculture. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  101. van Marrewijk, A., & Yanow, D. (Eds.). (2010). Organizational spaces: Rematerializing the workaday world. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  102. Walker, R. (1989). A requiem for corporate geography: New directions in industrial organization, the production of place and the uneven development. Geografiska Annaler Series B, Human Geography, 71, 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Werlen, B. (1993). Society, action and space: An alternative human geography (G. Walls, Trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  104. Werlen, B. (2010a). Gesellschaftliche Räumlichkeit 1. Orte der Geographie [Societal spatiality 1: Places of geography]. Stuttgart, Germany: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
  105. Werlen, B. (2010b). Gesellschaftliche Räumlichkeit 2. Konstruktion geographischer Wirklichkeiten [Societal spatiality 2: Construction of geographical realities]. Stuttgart, Germany: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
  106. Withers, C. W. J. (2002). The geography of scientific knowledge. In N. A. Rupke (Ed.), Göttingen and the development of the natural sciences (pp. 9–18). Göttingen, Germany: Wallstein.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ariane Berthoin Antal
    • 1
    Email author
  • Peter Meusburger
    • 2
  • Laura Suarsana
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Unit “Cultural Sources of Newness,”Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB)BerlinGermany
  2. 2.Department of GeographyHeidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations