Body as Gendered and Sexualised and Recent Migration of Poles to the United Kingdom

  • Bernadetta SiaraEmail author
Part of the International Perspectives on Migration book series (IPMI, volume 6)


This chapter focuses on the constructions around body as gendered and sexualised within recent migration of Poles to the United Kingdom (UK). Poles migrate, as it appears, from an environment in Poland characterised by more conservative views on gender and sexuality to a seemingly more liberal environment in the UK. This chapter uses the feminist perspective and examines the influence of this migration on discourses around body and its potential to liberate conservative discourses. It also utilizes intersectionality framework as lens to examine issues around body and analyses how specific social categories such as gender and sexuality, seen as ‘social processes’, simultaneously influence construction of these issues (Nash 2008). This chapter uses internet forum discussions as data. Different views on body were identified through the analysis and it was found that debates contained a mixture of nationalist, patriarchal, conservative and liberal attitudes. The nationalist discourse is dominant in Poland and this analysis showed that this discourse in a way “travelled” with migrants. However, counter-discourses were created in the process such as the liberal one, which gives women choice in relation to their lives and does not prescribe strict gender and sexual roles. This chapter showed how bodies are becoming ‘gendered’ and sexualised within migration space (Jackson & Scott 2001). The analysis demonstrated that gender and sexual ideologies and environments have a great impact on people’s views on body, particularly on women’s bodies. It also demonstrated that gender and sexual ideologies and practices are negotiated and reshaped as part of the migration process (McIlwaine et al. 2006; Datta et al. 2008), where different views on gender and sexuality as well of intersections of these with ethnicity come into play.


Ethnic Origin National Health System Unplanned Pregnancy Abortion Service Liberal Attitude 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abbott, P., Wallace, C., & Tyler, M. (2005). An introduction to sociology. Feminist perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Akpinar, A. (2003). The honour/shame complex revisited: Violence against women in the migration context. Women’s Studies International Studies, 26(5), 425–442.Google Scholar
  3. Bator, J. (1999). Wizerunek Kobiety w Polskiej Debacie Politycznej: Perspektywa Feministyczna [The woman’s image in the polish public debate]. Warsaw: Institute for Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  4. Booth, S. (2005). Looking-glass women? A comparative analysis of gender and nation in Britain and the Czech Republic. In V. Tolz & S. Booth (Eds.), Nation and gender in contemporary Europe. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  5. Bordo, S. (2004). The body and the reproduction of femininity. In M. Kimmell & A. Aronson (Eds.), The gendered society reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Byrne, M. (2001). Data analysis strategies for qualitative research – Research corner. AORN Journal, 1. Accessed 28 Mar 2010.
  7. Charles, N. (2002). Gender in modern Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dannecker, P. (2005). Transnational migration and the transformation of gender relations: The case of Bangladeshi labour migrants. Current Sociology, 53, 655–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Datta, K., McIlwaine, C., Herbert, J., Evans, Y., May, J., & Wills, J. (2008). Mobile masculinities: Men, migration and low paid work in London. University of Queen Mary, London. Accessed 2 Feb 2009.
  10. Donato, K., Gabaccia, D., Holdaway, J., Manalansan, M., & Pessar, P. (2006). A glass half full? Gender in migration studies. International Migration Review, 40(1), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duch-Krzystoszek, D. (1997). Malzenstwo, Seks, Prokreacja. Analiza Socjologiczna [Marriage, sex and procreation. Sociological analysis]. Warsaw: IFIS PAN.Google Scholar
  12. Einhorn, B. (1996). Gender, ethnicity, and nationalism. Women’s Studies International Forum, 19(1/2), 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Erel, U., Morokvasic, M., & Shinozaki, K. (2002). Introduction bringing gender into migration. In M. Morokvasic-Muller, K. Shinozaki, & U. Erel (Eds.), Crossing borders and shifting boundaries (Gender on the move. International Women’s University, Vol. 1). Opladen: Leske and Budrich.Google Scholar
  14. Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5 (1). Accessed 5 Apr 2010.
  15. Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  16. Gontarczyk, E. (1995). Kobiecosc i Meskosc jako Kategorie Spoleczno-Kulturowe w Studiach Feministycznych [Femininity and masculinity as socio-cultural categories in feminist studies]. Poznan: Eruditus.Google Scholar
  17. Graff, A. (2008). Kobieta i Odmieniec – Zakladnicy Narodu [Woman and the other – Prisoners of the Nation]. Krytyka Polityczna [Political Critique]. Accessed 5 May 2008.
  18. Hauser, E., Heyns, B., & Mansbridge, J. (1993). Feminism in the interstices of politics and culture: Poland in transition. In N. Funk & M. Mueller (Eds.), Gender politics and post-communism. Reflections from Eastern Europe and The Former Soviet Union. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Hewson, C., Yule, P., Laurent, D., & Vogel, C. (2003). Internet research methods: A practical guide for the social and behavioural sciences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Home Office. (2009). Accession monitoring report May 2004 – December 2008. A joint online report between the Border and Immigration Agency, the Department of Work and Pensions, the HM Revenue & Customs and Communities and Local Government. Accessed 1 Apr 2009.
  21. Jackson, S., & Scott, S. (2001). Putting the body’s feet on the ground: Towards a sociological reconceptualization of gendered and sexual embodiment. In K. Backett-Milburn & L. McKie (Eds.), Constructing gendered bodies. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  22. Kramer, A. M. (2007). The abortion debate in Poland; Opinion polls, ideological politics, citizenship and the erasure of gender as a category of analysis. In J. E. Johnson & J. C. Robinson (Eds.), Living gender after communism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ksieniewicz, M. (2004). Specyfika polskiego feminizmu [Specificity of polish feminism]. Kultura i Historia [Culture and History], 6. Accessed 6 June 2008.
  24. Liu, L. (1994). The female body and nationalist discourse: The field of life and death revisited. In I. Grewal & C. Kaplan (Eds.), Scattered hegemonies: Postmodernity and transnational feminist practices. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lorber, J. (1999). Embattled terrain: Gender and sexuality. In M. M. Ferree, J. Lorber, & B. H. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Lorber, J. (2005). Gender inequality: Feminist theories and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lorber, J., & Martin, P. (2008). The socially constructed body: Insights from feminist theory. In P. Kivisto (Ed.), Illuminating social life classical and contemporary theory revisited. London: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  28. Mahler, S., & Pessar, P. (2006). Gender matters: Ethnographers bring gender from the periphery toward the core of migration studies. International Migration Review, 40(1), 27–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Markham, A. (2005). The methods, politics and ethics of representation in online ethnography. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. McClintock, A. (1997). No longer in a future heaven: Gender, race and nationalism. In A. McClintock, A. Mufti, & E. Shohat (Eds.), Dangerous liaisons: Gender, nation, and postcolonial perspectives. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
  31. McDowell, L., Batnitzky, A., & Dyer, S. (2008). Migration, employment and gender divisions of labour. In J. Scott, S. Dex, & H. Joshi (Eds.), Women and employment: Changing lives and new challenges. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  32. McIlwaine, C., Datta, K., Evans, Y., Herbert, J., May, J., & Wills, J. (2006). Gender and ethnic identities among low paid migrant workers in London. Accessed 2 Feb 2008.
  33. Melchiori, P. (2001). Women redefining politics: Between new challenges and old illusions. In V. Demos & M. Texler Segal (Eds.), An international challenge to theory. Advances in gender research (Vol. 5). London: JAI.Google Scholar
  34. Melosik, Z. (2002). Kryzys Meskosci w Kulturze Wspolczesnej [The crisis of masculinity in contemporary culture]. Poznan: WoluminGoogle Scholar
  35. Miles, R., & Small, S. (1999). Racism and ethnicity. In S. Taylor (Ed.), Sociology: Issues and debates. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. Milic, A. (1996). Nationalism and sexism: Eastern Europe in transition. In R. Caplan & J. Feffer (Eds.), Europe’s new nationalisms: States and minorities in conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Nash, J. (2008). Re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nowicka, W. (1996). Roman catholic fundamentalism against women’s reproductive rights in Poland. Reproductive Health Matters, 8, 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pankowska, D. (2005). Wychowanie a Role Plciowe [Bringing up and gender roles]. Gdansk: GWP.Google Scholar
  40. Pascall, G., & Kwak, A. (2005). Gender regimes in transition in central and eastern Europe. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  41. Petersen, A. (2003). Research on men and masculinities: Some implications of recent theory for future work. Men and Masculinities, 6(1), 54–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pilcher, J. (1999). Women in contemporary Britain. An introduction. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pilkington, A. (2003). Racial disadvantage and ethnic diversity in Britain. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  44. Pryke, S. (1998). Nationalism and sexuality, what are the issues? Nations and Nationalism, 4(4), 529–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Puri, J. (2004). Encountering nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Romano, N., Donovan, C., Chen, H., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2003). A methodology for analyzing web-based qualitative data. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 213–246.Google Scholar
  47. Rutter, H., & Smith, G. W. H. (2005). Ethnographic presence in a nebulous setting. In C. Hine (Ed.), Virtual methods. Issues in social research and the internet. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  48. Saxonberg, S. (2000). Polish women in the mid 1990s. Czech Sociological Review, 8(2), 244–253.Google Scholar
  49. Sharp, J. (1996). Gendering nationhood: A feminist engagement with national identity. In N. Duncan (Ed.), Bodyspace: Destabilizing geographies of gender and sexuality. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Siara, B. (2009). UK poles and the negotiation of gender and ethnic identity in cyberspace. In K. Burrell (Ed.), Polish migration to the UK in the “new” European Union. After 2004. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  51. Smith, H. L. (2000). The women’s movement, politics and citizenship, 1960s–2000. In I. Zweiniger-Bargielowska (Ed.), Women in twentieth-century Britain. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  52. Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Yuval-Davis, N., & Anthias, F. (1989). Woman – Nation – State. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  54. Zielinska, E. (2000). Between ideology, politics and common sense: The discourse of reproductive rights in Poland. In S. Gal & G. Kligman (Eds.), Reproducing gender politics, publics, and everyday life after socialism. Chichester: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Zweiniger-Bargielowska, I. (2000). Introduction. In I. Zweiniger-Bargielowska (Ed.), Women in twentieth-century Britain. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Applied Social SciencesUniversity Campus SuffolkIpswichUK

Personalised recommendations