Historiographical Issues in the History of Cold

Chapter
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science book series (BSPS, volume 299)

Abstract

“Corpses frozen for future rebirth” ran the title of an article describing the gory business of promising immortality. Ample supply of liquid nitrogen and some technical issues in the freezing process itself, were sufficient to do the trick. The presence of cold in our cultural ethos, has not been exclusively associated with promises of deathlessness. In Dante’s Inferno, Satan is portrayed as a giant beast, half of his body immersed in ice at the center of Hell. The Satan beats his wings, and the cold wind is a continuous reminder that there is not an instant of reprieve for the sinners condemned in the Ninth Circle, where the worst of sinners, those who betrayed their benefactors, are in perpetual suffering. The dominance of cold, however, is not confined, only, to one of the emblematic works of literature of the western world. The Cold War dominated politics for almost half a century (1947–1991) and after it was over what dominated the discussions among historians and political scientists was the attempts to understand what actually happened during those politically scorching years. Cold fusion – the possibility to have endless energy from the light nuclei with almost no energy input –, a fantasy entertained by few, caught the imagination of millions for a short moment when it was announced in 1989. Alas, compared with the eternity of the Ninth Circle and the intensity of the panic inflicted to the West by the Soviet Union, cold fusion had a minuscule life-time. Materials exhibiting zero electrical resistance would have been at the very heart of another kind of fantasy where, for example, electrical current would be transmitted with almost no losses, trains would travel on these materials with almost no need to supply energy to keep them running. The discovery of superconductivity in 1911 gave an end to these fantasies, since the cost at maintaining the temperatures required in order to make some materials superconducting was unimaginably high. Any practical large scale commercial utilization of such materials appeared to be an impossible dream, until 1986 when such hopes were rekindled by a new generation of materials which were found to exhibit superconducting properties in very high temperatures, still low enough to have a practical use. The genie of a superconductor at room temperatures, however, was out of the bottle.

References

  1. Brush, S.G. 1983. Statistical physics and the atomic theory of matter from Boyle and Newton to Landau and Onsager. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Dahl, P.F. 1992. Superconductivity: Its historical roots and development from mercury to the ceramic oxides. New York: American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
  3. Dienel, H.-L. 2004. Linde. History of a technology corporation, 1879–2004. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Evans, J. 2008. Frozen food science and technology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Freidberg, S. 2009. Fresh. A perishable history. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gavroglu, K. 1995. Fritz London, a scientific biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gavroglu, K., and Y. Goudarpoulis. 1989. Methodological aspects in the development of low temperature physics 1881–1956: Concepts out of context(s). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Gavroglu, K., and Y. Goudaroulis (eds.). 1991. Through measurement to knowledge, the selected papers of Heike Kamerlingh Onnes 1853–1926. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Hacking, I. 2006. Another new world is being constructed now: The ultracold. Preprint 316. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for the History of Science.Google Scholar
  10. Hard, M. 1994. Machines are a frozen spirit, the scientification of refrigeration and brewing in the 19th century – A Weberian interpretations. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Kapitza, P. 1965. Heat transfer and superfluidity of helium-II [1941]. In Collected papers of P.L. Kapitza, vol. 2, ed. D. ter Haar. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kapitza, P. 1981 Problems of liquid helium. A report at the General Assembly of the USSR Academy of Sciences, 28 December 1940. Reprinted in P.L. Kapitza, Experiment, theory, practice. Articles and addresses. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  13. Landau, L.D. 1949. On the theory of superfluidity. Physical Review 75: 880–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oldenziel, R., and K. Zachmann. 2009. Cold war kitchen, Americanization, technology and European users. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Papanelopoulou, F. 2009. The International Association of Refrigeration through the correspondence of Heike Kamerlingh Onnes and Charles-Edouard Guillaume, 1908–1914. Annals of Science 66: 345–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Petrick, G.M. 2006. The arbiters of taste: producers, consumers, and the industrialization of taste in America, 1900–1960. Doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
  17. Rees, J. 2013. Refrigeration nation, a history of ice, appliances, and enterprise in America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Robinson, L.M. 1997. Safeguarded by your refrigerator: Mary Engle Pennington’s Struggle with the National Association of Ice Industries. In Rethinking home economics: Women and the history of a profession, ed. Sarah Stage and Virginia B. Vincenti, 253–270. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Rowlinson, J.S. 2012. James Dewar 1842–1923, a ruthless chemist. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  20. Thevenot, R. 1979. A history of refrigeration throughout the world. Trans. from French J.C. Fidler. Paris: International Institute of Refrigeration.Google Scholar
  21. Tisza, L. 1938. Transport phenomena in helium-II. Nature 141: 913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. van Delft, D. 2007. Facilitating Leiden’s cold: The International Association of Refrigeration and the Internationalisation of Heike Kamerlingh Onnes’s Cryogenic Laboratory. Centaurus 49: 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van Delft, D. 2008. Freezing physics. Heike Kamerlingh Onnes and the quest for cold. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  24. van Helden, A.C. 1989. The coldest spot on earth. Kamerlingh Onnes and low temperature research, 1882–1923. Leiden: Museum Boerhaave.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of History and Philosophy of ScienceUniversity of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations