Forests for All? Considering the Conservation Implications of Human-Species Interactions in the Context of Multifunctional Forestry

  • Mariella Marzano
  • Christopher P. Quine
  • Norman Dandy
Chapter
Part of the Forestry Sciences book series (FOSC, volume 81)

Abstract

People and wildlife interact in many ways and recently there has been increased recognition that forests have multiple uses and management objectives providing opportunities for recreation, education, conservation and enhancement of biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and the production of timber and fuel. Whilst many benefits can perhaps be delivered simultaneously, there is potential for conflict between these objectives. In this chapter we focus on the possibly contradictory objectives of recreation and conservation. Forests are increasingly places where human-wildlife interactions occur through recreational activities such as walking, cycling, nature-watching, and general visits to relax, play and/or picnic. The pursuit of outdoor recreational activities can have substantial human benefits including improved mental and physical health; and there is evidence to suggest that positive recreational experiences are associated with natural [forest] settings where there is an opportunity to see or hear wildlife.

Public forest managers are charged with concurrently delivering broad ecological, social and economic benefits, which requires that they must, amongst other things, balance the impacts of public access for recreation with the requirement to conserve biological diversity. In the UK, the relatively recent focus on the ‘multifunctionality’ of the forest resource suggests that a strong evidence base is needed to inform decision-making regarding the balance and trade-offs between different functions. This chapter explores the key issues around human-species interactions in forests providing evidence on ecological impacts, but also highlighting major knowledge gaps on the social practices and attitudes tied to recreational activities and how these may be linked to greater awareness of wildlife, habitats and their needs. While the majority of evidence is based at the site level, we argue that assessment of the interactions between recreation and conservation should also take place at landscape scale to facilitate the wider provision of public benefits.

Keywords

Recreational Activity Sustainable Forest Management Road Vehicle Outdoor Recreation Mountain Bike 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aitchison C, MacLeod NE, Shaw SJ (2000) Leisure and tourism landscapes: social and cultural geographies. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson P, Radford E (1992) A review of the effects of recreation on woodland soils vegetation and flora. English Nature Research Reports, 27. Peterborough, English NatureGoogle Scholar
  3. Banks PB, Bryant JV (2007) Four-legged friend or foe? Dog walking displaces native birds from natural areas. Biol Lett 3:611–613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barr S (2007) Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviours. A U.K. caset study of household waste management. Environ Behav 39(4):435–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanc R, Guillemain M, Mouronval JB, Desmonts D, Fritz H (2006) Effects of non-consumptive leisure disturbance to wildlife. Revue D Ecologie-La Terre Et La Vie 61(2):117–133Google Scholar
  6. Bright AD, Porter R (2001) Wildlife-related recreation, meaning, and environmental concern. Hum Dimens Wildl 6(4):259–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buckley R (2004) Environmental impacts of ecotourism. CABI Publishing, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buijs AE, Pedroli B, Luginbuhl Y (2006) From hiking through farmland to farming in a leisure landscape: changing social perceptions of the European landscape. Landsc Ecol 21:375–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell JE, Gibson DJ (2001) The effects of seeds of exotic species transported via horse dung on vegetation along trail corridors. Plant Ecol 157:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carter C, Lawrence A, Lovell R, O’Brien L (2009) The Forestry Commission public forest estate in England: social use, value and expectations. Final report. Forest ResearchGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole DN (2004) Impacts of hiking and camping on soils and vegetation: a review. In: Buckley R (ed) Environmental impacts of ecotourism. CABI Publishing, New York, pp 41–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cushman JH, Meentemeyer RK (2008) Multi-scale patterns of human activity and the incidence of an exotic forest pathogen. J Ecol 96(4):766–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Defra (2007) Conserving biodiversity – the UK approach. www.defra.gov.uk. Accessed 30 July 2012
  14. Defra (2011) Biodiversity 2020: a strategy for England’s wildlife and ecosystem services. Defra, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunlap RE, Heffernan RB (1975) Outdoor recreation and environmental concern: an empirical examination. Rural Sociol 40(1):18–30Google Scholar
  16. Edwards D, Morris J, O’Brien L, Sarajevs V, Valatin G (2008) The economic and social contribution of forestry for people in Scotland. Research Note FCRN102, Forestry Commission Scotland, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernandez-Juricic E, Jimenez MD, Lucas E (2002) Factors affecting intra- and inter-specific variations in the difference between alert distances and flight distances for birds in forested habitats. Can J Zool-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 80(7):1212–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forestry Commission (2011a) The UK forestry standard. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh, p 108Google Scholar
  19. Forestry Commission (2011b) Forestry statistics 2011. Forestry Commission, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  20. Forestry Commission (2011c) Public opinion of forestry 2011, UK and England. Results from the UK survey of public opinion of forestry. Forestry Commission, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  21. Geisler CC, Martinson OB, Wilkening EA (1977) Outdoor recreation and environmental concern. A restudy. Rural Sociol 42(2):241–249Google Scholar
  22. Geraghty T (2000) An examination of the physical and social aspects of mountain biking at Bestwood Park. Combined Studies in Science. Nottingham, Nottingham Trent. B.Sc. (Honours), p. 72Google Scholar
  23. Health Council of the Netherlands and Dutch Advisory Council for Research in Spatial Planning, Nature and the Environment (2004) Nature and health. The influence of nature on social, psychological and physical well-being. The Hague: health Council of the Netherlands and RMNO publication no 2004/09EGoogle Scholar
  24. Heer C, Rusterholz HP, Baur B (2003) Forest perception and knowledge of hikers and mountain bikers in two different areas in north-western Switzerland. Environ Manage 31(6):709–723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Higginbottom K (2004) Wildlife tourism: impacts, management and planning. Common Ground Pty Ltd, AltonaGoogle Scholar
  26. Hung Lee T (2011) How recreation involvement, place attachment and conservation commitment affect environmentally responsible behaviour. J Sustain Tour 19(7):895–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Independent Panel on Forestry (2012) Final report. http://www.defra.gov.uk./forestrypanelGoogle Scholar
  28. Jacoby J (1990) Mountain bikes: a new dilemma for wildland recreation managers? West Wildlands 16:360–368Google Scholar
  29. Jules ES, Kauffman MJ, Ritts WD, Carroll AL (2002) Spread of an invasive pathogen over a variable landscape: a nonnative root rot on Port Orford cedar. Ecology 83(11):3167–3181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaplan S (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: towards an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol 15(3):169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kareiva P (2008) Ominous trends in nature recreation. Natl Acad Sci USA 105(8):2757–2758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. King K (2010) Lifestyle, identity and young people’s experiences of mountain biking. Forestry Commission Research Note 007Google Scholar
  33. Kissling M, Hegetschweiler K, Rusterhoz HP, Baur B (2009) Short-term and long-term effects of human trampling on above-ground vegetation, soil density, soil organic matter and soil microbial processes in suburban beech forests. Appl Soil Ecol 42(3):303–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Klein ML (1993) Waterbird behavioural responses to human disturbances. Wildl Soc Bull 21(1):31–39Google Scholar
  35. Landsberg J, Logan B, Shorthouse D (2001) Horse riding in urban conservation areas: reviewing scientific evidence to guide management. Ecol Manag Restor 2(1):36–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Langston RHW, Liley D, Murison G, Woodfield E, Clarke RT (2007) What effects do walkers and dogs have on the distribution and productivity of breeding European Nightjar Caprimulgus europaeus? IBIS 149(s1):27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Larson LR, Whiting JW, Green GT (2011) Exploring the influence of outdoor recreation participation on pro environmental behaviour in a demographically diverse population. Local Environ 16(1):67–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lathrop J (2003) Ecological impacts of mountain biking: a critical literature review. University of Montana, MontanaGoogle Scholar
  39. Lemelin RH, Wiersma EC (2007) Perceptions of polar bear tourists: a qualitative analysis. Hum Dimens Wildl 12:45–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leung Y-F, Marion JL (2004) Managing impacts of camping. In: Buckley R (ed) Environmental impacts of ecotourism. CABI Publishing, New York, pp 245–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Liddle M (1997) Recreation ecology. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Littlemore J, Barlow C (2005) Managing public access for wildlife in woodlands – ecological principles and guidelines for best practice. Q J For 99(4):271–285Google Scholar
  43. Louv R (2005) Last child in the woods: saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Algonquin, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  44. Lowe P (2008) Whose land is it anyway? ECSS lecture series, Birkbeck, 17th OctGoogle Scholar
  45. Marion JL, Dvorak RG, Manning RE (2008) Wildlife feeding in parks: methods for monitoring the effectiveness of educational interventions and wildlife food attraction behaviors. Hum Dimens Wildl 13(6):429–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Martin S (2006) Leisure landscapes: exploring the role of forestry in tourism. Forest Research, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  47. Martin S (2007) Leisure landscapes: exploring the role of forestry in tourism. Forestry Commission, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  48. Martin S (2008) Developing woodlands for tourism: concepts, connections and challenges. J Sustain Tour 16:386–407Google Scholar
  49. Marzano M, Dandy N (2012a) Recreationist behaviour in forests and the disturbance of wildlife. Biodivers Conserv 21(11):2967–2986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marzano M, Dandy N (2012b) Recreational use of forests and disturbance of wildlife – a literature review. Forestry Commission Research Report. Forestry Commission, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  51. Mather AS (2001) Forests of consumption: postproductivism, postmaterialism and the postindustrial forest. Environ Plan C, Gov Pol 19:567–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  53. Naylor LM, Wisdom MJ, Anthony RG (2009) Behavioral responses of North American elk to recreational activity. J Wildl Manag 73(3):328–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Newsome D, Milewski A et al (2002a) Effects of horse riding on national parks and other natural ecosystems in Australia: implications for management. J Ecotourism 1(1):52–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Newsome D, Moore SA, Dowling RK (2002b) Natural area tourism: ecology, impacts and management. Channel View Publications, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  56. Nord M, Luloff AE, Bridger J (1998) The association of forest recreation with environmentalism. Environ Behav 30(2):235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. O’Brien L (2005) Trees and woodlands: nature’s health service. Forest Research, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  58. O’Brien L, Morris J (2009) Active England. The woodland projects. Forest Research, FarnhamGoogle Scholar
  59. O’Brien L, Morris J (2013) Well-being for all? The social distribution of benefits gained from woodlands and forests in Britain. Local Environ. doi:10.1080/13549839.2013.790354Google Scholar
  60. O’Connell M, Yallop M (2002) Research needs in relation to the conservation of biodiversity in the UK. Biol Conserv 103:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Otte A, Simmering D, Wolters V (2007) Biodiversity at the landscape level: recent concepts and perspectives for multifunctional land use. Landsc Ecol 22:639–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pretty J, Griffin M, Peacock J, Hine R, Sellens M, South N (2005) A countryside for health and well-being: the physical and mental health benefits of green exercise. A report for the Countryside Recreation Network, UKGoogle Scholar
  63. Pryor SN, Peterken GF (2001) Protected forest areas in the UK: report for the WWF and forestry commission. Oxford Forestry Institute, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  64. Quine CP, Humphrey JW (2010) Plantations of exotic tree species in Britain: irrelevant for biodiversity or novel habitat for native species? Biodivers Conserv 19:1503–1512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Quine CP, Humphrey JW, Watts K (2004) Biodiversity in the UK’s forests – recent policy developments and future research challenges. In: Paivanen R, Franc A (eds) Towards the sustainable use of Europe’s forests – forest ecosystem and landscape research: scientific challenges and opportunities. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp 237–248Google Scholar
  66. Rackham O (2001) Trees and woodlands in the British landscape: the complete history of Britain’s trees, woods and hedgerows. (Revised Edition). Phoenix Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  67. Rasmussen H, Simpson S (2010) Disturbance of waterfowl by boaters on pool 4 of the upper Mississippi river national wildlife and fish refuge. Soc Nat Resour 23:322–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Roovers P, Verheyen K, Hermy M, Gulinck H (2004) Experimental trampling and vegetation recovery in some forest and healthland communities. Appl Veg Sci 7(1):111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Royal society (2009) Reaping the benefits: science and the sustainable intensification of global agriculture. Royal Society, LondonGoogle Scholar
  70. Ruff A, Mellors O (1993) The mountain bike – the dream machine? Landsc Res 18:104–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Seymour RS, Hunter ML Jr (1999) Principles of ecological forestry. In: Hunter ML Jr (ed) Maintaining biodiversity in forested ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 22–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Showler DA, Stewart GB, Sutherland WJ, Pullin AS (2010) What is the impact of public access on the breeding success of ground-nesting and cliff-nesting birds? Systematic review CEE 05–010, Collaboration for Environmental EvidenceGoogle Scholar
  73. Smith-Castro J, Rodewald A (2010) Behavioral responses of nesting birds to human disturbance along recreational trails. J Field Ornithol 82(2):130–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sterl P, Brandenburg C, Arnberger A (2008) Visitors’ awareness and assessment of recreational disturbance of wildlife in the Donau-Auen National Park. J Nat Conserv 16(3):135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Taylor AR, Knight RL (2003) Wildlife response to recreational and associated visitor perceptions. Ecol Appl 13:951–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Teisl MF, O’Brien K (2003) Who cares and who acts? Different types of outdoor recreationists exhibit different levels of environmental concern and behaviour. Environ Behav 35:506–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Turton SM (2005) Managing environmental impacts of recreation and tourism in rainforests of the wet tropics of Queensland World Heritage Area. Geogr Res 43(2):140–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Valentine P, Birtles A (2004) Wildlife watching. In: Higginbottom K (ed) Wildlife tourism: impacts, management and planning. Common Ground Publishing, Altona, pp 15–34Google Scholar
  79. Weaver T, Dale D (1978) Trampling effects of hikers, motorcycles and horses in meadows and forests. J Appl Ecol 15:451–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. White DD, Waskey MT, Brodehl GP, Foti PE (2006) A comparative study of impacts to mountain bike trails in five common ecological regions of the Southwestern U.S. J Park Recreat Adm 24(2):21–41Google Scholar
  81. Wimpey JF, Marion JL (2010) The influence of use, environmental and managerial factors on the width of recreational trails. J Environ Manage 91(10):2028–2037PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wolf ID, Croft DB (2010) Minimizing disturbance to wildlife by tourists approaching on foot or in a car: a study of kangaroos in the Australian rangelands. Appl Anim Behav Sci 126(1–2):75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariella Marzano
    • 1
  • Christopher P. Quine
    • 1
  • Norman Dandy
    • 1
  1. 1.FR-NRS, Roslin & Alice Holt LodgeFarnhamUK

Personalised recommendations