Weather Station Siting: Effects on Phenological Models

  • Richard L. Snyder
  • Donatella Spano
  • Pierpaolo Duce
Chapter

Abstract

Accurate temperature data is important for both the development and use of phenological models, and this chapter discusses topics related to temperature measurement for use in phenological models. The chapter presents a short history of temperature measurement, the theory of temperature sensors, radiation shielding, and guidelines on weather sensor placement. Physiological time (degree day) calculation and its application are described. The impact of underlying surface, fetch, and surrounding environment on temperature and phenological time are discussed and some guidelines on measurement are presented.

Keywords

Phenological Model Standard Platinum Resistance Thermometer Grass Surface Intermittent Rainfall Primary Thermometer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allen JC (1976) A modified sine wave method for calculating degree days. Environ Entomol 5:388–396Google Scholar
  2. Baskerville GL, Emin P (1969) Rapid estimation of heat accumulation from maximum and minimum temperatures. Ecology 50:514–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Camuffo D, Bertolin C, della Valle A, Cocheo C, Diodato N, Enzi S, Sghedoni M, Barriendos M, Rodriguez R, Dominguez-Castro F, Garnier E, Alcoforado MJ, Nunes MF (2011) Climate change in the Mediterranean over the last five hundred years. In: Carayannis EG (ed) Planet earth 2011 – global warming challenges and opportunities for policy and practice. InTech, RijekaGoogle Scholar
  4. Cesaraccio C, Spano D, Duce P, Snyder RL (2001) An improved model for degree-days from temperature data. Int J Biometeorol 45:161–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Gaetano A, Knapp WW (1993) Standardization of weekly growing degree day accumulations based on differences in temperature observation and method. Agric For Meteorol 66:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gill GC (1983) Comparison testing of selected naturally ventilated solar radiation shields, Final report contract # NA-82-OA-A-266, NOAA, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  7. Horstmeyer S (2001) Building blocks – what goes on in a cubic meter of air? Weatherwise 54(5):20–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson ME, Fitzpatrick EA (1977) A comparison of methods of estimating a mean diurnal temperature curve during the daylight hours. Arch Meteorol Geophys Bioklimatol Ser B 25:251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kline DE, Reid JF, Woeste FE (1982) Computer simulation of hourly dry-bulb temperatures. Virginia Agric Exp Sta, No 82–5. Virginia Politechnical Institute and State University, BlacksburgGoogle Scholar
  10. Kramer K (1994) Selecting a model to predict the onset of growth of Fagus sylvatica. J Appl Ecol 31:172–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Monteith JL, Unsworth MH (1990) Principles of environmental physics, 2nd edn. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Parton WJ, Logan JA (1981) A model for diurnal variation in soil and air temperature. Agric For Meteorol 23:205–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pellizzaro G, Spano D, Canu A, Cesaraccio C (1996) Calcolo dei gradi–giorno per la previsione delle fasi fenologiche nell’actinidia. Italus Hortus 5:24–30Google Scholar
  14. Quinn TJ (1985) Temperature. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Reicosky LJ, Winkelman JM, Baker JM, Baker DG (1989) Accuracy of hourly air temperatures calculated from daily minima and maxima. Agric For Meteorol 46:193–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roltsch JW, Zalom FG, Strawn AJ, Strand JF, Pitcairn MJ (1999) Evaluation of several degree day estimation methods in California climates. Int J Biometeorol 42:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Snyder RL (1985) Hand calculating degree-days. Agric For Meteorol 35:353–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Snyder RL, Spano D, Cesaraccio C, Duce P (1999) Determining degree-day threshold from field observations. Int J Biometeorol 42:177–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Snyder RL, Spano D, Duce P, Cesaraccio C (2001) Temperature data for phenological models. Int J Biometeorol 45:178–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wann M, Yen D, Gold HJ (1985) Evaluation and calibration of three models for daily cycle of air temperature. Agric For Meteorol 34:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wilson LT, Barnett WW (1983) Degree-days: an aid in crop and pest management. Calif Agric 37:4–7Google Scholar
  22. Yin X, Kropff MJ, McLaren G, Visperas RM (1995) A nonlinear model for crop development as a function of temperature. Agric For Meteorol 77:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zalom FG, Goodell PB, Wilson WW, Bentley WJ (1983) Degree-days: the calculation and the use of heat units in pest management, Leaflet 21373. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard L. Snyder
    • 1
  • Donatella Spano
    • 2
    • 3
  • Pierpaolo Duce
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Land, Air, and Water ResourcesUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Science for Nature and Environmental Resources (DipNet)University of SassariSassariItaly
  3. 3.Euro-Mediterranean Centre for Climate Change (CMCC)SassariItaly
  4. 4.Institute of BiometeorologyNational Research CouncilSassariItaly

Personalised recommendations