Educational Theory: The Specific Case of Social Justice as an Educational Leadership Construct
Social justice is both necessary and contingent with respect to education, that is, social justice can never be guaranteed or sustained without continuous efforts, including work within difficult – undemocratic– circumstances.
Social justice, as a deliberate intervention, is different from good teaching and moral leadership.
- 3.Educational researchers come to know social justice through consequences experienced by participants, not by:
A priori theoretical concepts
Well-intentioned dispositions of researchers
Researcher awareness or diagnosis of inequities
As such, social justice is defined by material changes in participants’ lives and only then is it validated by educational researchers post hoc.
Social justice as an educational leadership construct has to do with the PLACE of education in societies in terms of re-centering and engaging educational leadership within dominant social, political, economic, and transcendent discourses.
The chapter invites readers to make their own professional judgments regarding these operating principles which may entail considering them as hypotheses for empirical testing.
KeywordsSocial Justice Educational Researcher Educational Theory Educational Leadership Dominant Discourse
- Bauer, S., & Bogotch, I. (2001). An analysis of the relationships among site council resources, council practices, and outcomes. Journal of School Leadership, 11(2), 98–119.Google Scholar
- Biesta, G., & Safstrom, C. (2011). A manifesto for education. http://www.docstoc.com/docs/99835910/A-manifesto-for-education
- Bogotch, I. (2002). Educational leadership and social justice: Practice into theory. Journal of School Leadership, 12, 138–156.Google Scholar
- Bogotch, I., Beachum, F., Blount, J., Brooks, J., & English, F. (2008). Radicalizing educational leadership: Dimensions of social justice. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Bogotch, I., Keaster, R., Baldwin, B., & Wonycott, A. (1995). Exploring influences of contextual variables on beginning principals. Journal of School Leadership, 5(3), 231–247.Google Scholar
- Dewey, J. (1927/1954). The public and its problems. New York: Henry Holt and company.Google Scholar
- Eisner, E. (2002). The centrality of curriculum and the function of standards. Arts and creation of the mind (pp. 148–176). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Fanon, F. (1968). The wretched of the earth. New York: Grove Press, Inc.Google Scholar
- Hayden, P. (2002). John Rawls: Towards a just world order. Cardiff, UK: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
- Hayek, F. (1976). Law, legislation and liberty: A new statement of the liberal principles of justice and political economy. Volume II. The mirage of social justice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Leithwood, K. (2009). Closing the achievement gap: What successful school leaders know and do. Report prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
- Levitt, S. D., & Dubner, S. J. (2005). Freakonomics: A rogue economist explores the hidden side of everything (p. xxiv). New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
- Marshall, C., & Young, M. (2006). A. Bold assertion: Those who can’t or won’t shouldn’t. In C. Marshall & M. Oliva (Eds.), Leadership for social justice: Making revolutions in education (p. 308). Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
- Miron, L. (2006).A conception of performative ethnography. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- Nafisi, A. (2004). Teaching Lolita in Tehran. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Pinar, W. (2001). The gender of racial politics and violence in America. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Plato, Translated by Cornford, F. (1945/1964). The republic of Plato. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Russell, B. (1912/1970). The problems of philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Stevens, J. (2012, June 23) Political scientists are lousy forecasters. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/24/opinion/sunday/political-scientists-are-lousy-forecasters.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
- Weiss, C. (1991). Evaluation research in the political context: Sixteen years and four administrations later. In Evaluation and education: at quarter century (National Society for the Study of Education, Vol. 90 (2), Chapter IX, pp. 211–231). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Science Education. http://nsse-chicago.org/chapter.asp?uid=2655
- Young, I. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar