Using Ecosystem Services in Community-Based Landscape Planning: Science is Not Ready to Deliver

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

Community-based landscape governance is considered as conditional to achieving sustainable landscape. I consider landscape governance from the point of view of adapting landscapes to create value out of ecosystem services, using the social–ecological system model as a theoretical framework. I advocate the use of the term landscape services because it can serve as a common ground between science and local communities, and between scientists from different disciplines. Six principles for sustainable landscape change are presented, which can be developed as a checklist in planning, and as requirements to scientific methods. From the current literature it is obvious that ecosystem service research does not provide the type of science that is required to support sustainable, community-based landscape planning. Research is mainly science driven, focussed on assessments at large spatial scale, and with policy users in mind. Active involvement of local stakeholders is scarce. There is a strong demand for approaches that are able to involve local governance networks and move the ecosystem services research out of the static mapping and evaluation approaches towards dynamic systems thinking. The chapter ends with a research agenda.

Keywords

Landscape services Criteria for sustainability Social-ecological system Green infrastructure  Adaptive governance  Knowledge application  Habitat networks Landscape change  
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This chapter was inspired by many discussions with colleagues and on the ground applications in research led by Alterra. I thank Eveliene Steingröver, Sabine van Rooij, Carla Grashof, Severine van Bommel, JolandeTermorshuizen, Willemien Geertsema, Florence van den Bosch and many others. The EU-financed Interreg project GIFT-T! has financially contributed to the preparation of this chapter.

References

  1. Antrop M. Sustainable landscapes: contradiction, fiction or utopia? Landscape Urban Plan. 2006;75:187–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armitage DR, Plummer R, Berkes F, et al. Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Front Ecol Environ. 2009;7:95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbier EB, Koch EW, Silliman BR, et al. Coastal ecosystems-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values. Science. 2008;319:321–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benedict MA, McMahon ET. Green infrastructure. Linking landscapes and communities. Washington: Island Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett. 2009;12:1394–1404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bianchi FJJA, Booij CJH, Tscharntke T. Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review onlandscape composition, biodiversity and natural pestcontrol. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006;273:1715–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borch K. Emerging technologies in favour of sustainable agriculture. Futures. 2007;39:1045–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryan BA, Raymond CM, Crossman ND, Macdonald DH. Targeting the management of ecosystem services based on social values: where, what and how? Landscape Urban Plan. 2010;97:11–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burkhard B, Fath BD, Müller F. Adapting the adaptive cycle: hypotheses on the development of ecosystem properties and services. Ecol Model. 2011;222:2878–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carpenter SR, Folke C. Ecology of transformation. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006;21:309–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, et al. Science for managing ecosystem services; beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. PNAS. 2009;106:1305–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chan KM, Shaw MR, Cameron DR, Underwood EC, Daily GC. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLOS Biol. 2006;4:2138–52.Google Scholar
  13. Constanza R. Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biol Conserv. 2008;141:350–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davies ZG, Pullin AS. Are hedgerows effective corridors between fragments of woodland habitat? An evidence-based approach. Landscape Ecol. 2007;22:333–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeFries RS, Foley JA, Asner GP. Land-use choices; balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Front Ecol Environ. 2004;2:249–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Groot RS, Alkemade R, Braat L, Hein L, Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol Complex. 2010;7:260–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dietz S, Neumayer E. Weak and strong sustainability in the SEEA: concepts and measurement. Ecol Econ. 2007;61:617–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duelli P, Obrist MK. Regional biodiversity in an agricultural landscape: the contribution of seminatural habitat islands. Basic Appl Ecol. 2003;4:129–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Egoh B, Reyers B, Rouget M, Richardson DM, Le Maitre DC, van Jaarsveld AS. Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2008;127:135–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eigenbrod F, Armsworth PR, Anderson BJ, Heinemeyer A, Gillings S, Roy DB, Thomas CD, Gaston KJ. The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. J Appl Ecol. 2010;47:377–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eiswerth ME, Haney JC. Maximizing conserved biodiversity: why ecosystem indicators and thresholds matter. Ecol Econ. 2001;38:259–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ernstson H, Sörlin S, Elmqvist TH. Social movements and ecosystem services-the role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in Stockholm. Ecol Soc. 2008;13(2):39. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art39/.
  23. Fagerholm N, Käyhkö N, Ddumbaro F, Khamis M. Community stakeholders’ knowledge in landscape assessments-mapping indicators for landscape services. Ecol Ind. 2012;18:421–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Farber SC, Constanza R, Wilson MA. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecol Econ. 2002;41:375–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Farrell A, Hart M. What does sustainability really mean? The search for useful indicators. Environment. 1998;40(4/9):26–31.Google Scholar
  26. Feld CK, Martins da Silva P, Sousa JP, et al. Indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem services: a synthesis across ecosystems and spatial scales. Oikos. 2009;118:1862–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ. 2009;68:643–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Folke C, Hahn Th, Olsson P, Norberg J. Adaptive governance of social ecological systems. Ann Rev Environ Resour. 2005;30:441–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Foxon T, Reed MS, Stringer LC. Governing long-term social-ecological change: what can the adaptive management and transition management approaches learn from each other? Environ Policy Gov. 2009;19:3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fürst C, König H, Pietzsch K, Ende H-P, Makeschin F. Pimp your landscape-a generic approach for integrating regional stakeholder needs into land use planning. Ecol Soc. 2010;15(3):34. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art34/.
  31. George C. Testing for sustainable development through environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 1999;19:175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ghersa CM, Ferraro DO, Omacini M, Martínez-Ghersa MA, Perelman S, Satorre EH, Soriano A. Farm and landscape level variables as indicators of sustainable land-use in the Argentine Inland-Pampa. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2002;93:279–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grashof-Bokdam CJ, Van Langevelde F. Green veining: landscape determinants of biodiversity in European agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecol. 2004;20:417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grêt-Regamey A, Walz A, Bebi P. Valuing ecosystem services forsustainable landscape planning in Alpine regions. Mountain Res Dev. 2008;28:156–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hein L, Chr Van Koppen, de De Groot RS, Van Ierland EC. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ. 2006;57:209–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Herzon I, Helenius J. Agricultural ditches, their biological importance and functioning. Biol Conserv. 2008;141:1171–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hisschemöller M, Hoppe R, Dunn W, Ravetz J, editors. Knowledge, power and participation in environmental policy analysis. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers; 2001.Google Scholar
  38. Horwood K. Green Infrastructure: reconciling urban green space and regional economic development: lessons learnt from experience in England’s north-west region. Local Environ: Int J Justice Sustain. 2012;16:963–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jackson LL. Who “designs” the agricultural landscape? Landscape J. 2008;27:23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Janssen MA, Goosen H, Omzigt N. A simple mediation and negotiation support tool for water management in the Netherlands. Landscape Urban Plan. 2006;78:71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jiggins J, Van Slobbe E, Röling N. The organisation of social learning in response to perceptions of crisis in the water sector of The Netherlands. Environ Sci Policy. 2007;10:526–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kaplan R. Employees’ reactions to nearby nature at their workplace: the wild and the tame. Landscape Urban Plan. 2007;82:17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Koschke L, Fürst C, Frank S, Makeschin F. A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecol Ind. 2012;21:54–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lebel L, Anderies JM, Campbell B, Folke C, Hatfield-Dodds S, Hughes TP, Wilson J. Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 2006;11(1):19. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art19/.
  45. Leitão AB, Ahern J. Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape Urban Plan. 2002;59:65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Macleod CJA, Scholefield D, Haygarth PM. Integration for sustainable catchment management. Sci Total Environ. 2007;373:591–602.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martinez-Harms MJ, Balvanera P. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. Int J Biodivers Sci, Ecosyst Serv Manage. 2012;8:17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Matthews R, Selman P. Landscape as a focus for integrating human and environmental processes. J Agric Econ. 2006;57:199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mendoza GA, Prahbu R. Development of a methodology for selecting criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management: a case study on participatory assessment. Environ Manage. 2000;26:659–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Musacchio LR. The scientific basis fort he design of landscape sustainability: a conceptual framework for translation all and scape research and practice of designed landscapes and the six Es of landscape sustainability. Landscape Ecol. 2009;24:993–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Naeem S. Species redundancy and ecosystem reliability. Conserv Biol. 1998;12:39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nassauer JI. Landscape as medium and method for synthesis in urban ecological design. Landscape Urban Plan. 2012;106:221–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nassauer J, Opdam P. Design in science: extending the landscape ecology paradigm. Landscape Ecol. 2008;23:633–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nedkov S, Burkhard B. Flood regulating ecosystem services-mapping supply, and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria. Ecol Ind. 2011;21:67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, et al. Modelling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ. 2009;7:4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ode A, Fry G, Tveit MS, Messager P, Miller D. Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. J Environ Manage. 2009;90:375–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. O’Neill RV. Is it time to bury the ecosystem concept? Ecology. 2001;82:3275–84. (With full military honors of course!).Google Scholar
  58. Olsson P, Folke C, Hahn T. Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in Southern Sweden. Ecol Soc. 2004;9, 4 (online).Google Scholar
  59. Opdam P. Learning science from practice. Landscape Ecol. 2010;25:821–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Opdam P. Incorporating multiple ecological scales into the governance of landscape services. In: Padt F, Opdam P, Termeer C, Polman N, editors. Scale sensitive governance of the environment. London: Wiley Blackwell. 2013 (in press)Google Scholar
  61. Opdam P, Verboom J, Pouwels R. Landscape cohesion: an index for the conservation potential of landscapes for biodiversity. Landscape Ecol. 2003;18:113–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Opdam P, Steingröver E, Van Rooij S. Ecological networks: a spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes. Landscape Urban Plan. 2006;75:322–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pahl-Wostl C. The importance of social learning in restoring the multifunctionality of rivers and flood plains. Ecol Soc. 2006;11(1):10. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art10/.
  64. Papaik MJ, Sturtevant B, Messier C. Crossing scales and disciplines to achieve forest sustainability. Ecol Soc. 2008;13(1):30. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art30/.Google Scholar
  65. Petz K, Van Oudenhoven APE. Modelling land management effect on ecosystem services: a study in The Netherlands. Int J Biodivers Sci, Ecosyst Services Manage. 2012;8:135–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pinto-Correia T, Carvalho-Ribeiro S. The index of function suitability (IFS): a new tool for assessing the capacity of landscapes to provide amenity functions. Land Use Policy. 2012;29:23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Potschin M, Haines-Young R. Landscapes, sustainability and the place-based analysis of ecosystem services. Landscape Ecol. 2012 (on line).Google Scholar
  68. Raymond CM, Bryan BA, MacDonald DH, Cast A, Strathearn S, Grandgirard A, Kalivas T. Mapping community values for natural capital and ecosystem services. Ecol Econ. 2009;68:1301–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Reed MS, Fraser EDG, Dougill AJ. An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecol Econ. 2006;59:406–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Robert K-H, Daly H, Hawken P, Holmberg J. A compass for sustainable development. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 1997;4:79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rockström, J, Steffen W, Noone K, et al. Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc. 2009;14(2):32. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/.Google Scholar
  72. Röling NG. Teaching interactive approaches to natural resource management: a key ingredient in the development of sustainability in higher education. In: Corcoran PB, Wals AEJ, editors. Higher education and the challenge of sustainability. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar
  73. Schlüter M, MCallister RRJ, Arlinghaus R, Bunnefeld N, Eisenack K, Hölker F, Milner-Gulland EJ, Müller B. New horizons for managing the environment: a review of coupled social-ecological systems modelling. Natural Resour Model. 2012;25:219–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schouten MAH, Van der Heide CM, Heijman WJM, Opdam PFM. A resilience-based policy evaluation framework: application to European rural development policies. Ecol Econ. 2012;81:165–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schouten M, Opdam P, Polman N, Westerhof E. Resilience-based governance in rural landscapes: experiments with agri-environmental schemes using a spatially explicit agent-based model. Land Use Policy. 2013;30:934–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schultz L, Folke C, Olsson P. Enhancing ecosystem management through social-ecological inventories: lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, Sweden. Environ Conserv. 2007;34:140–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Scolozzi R, Morri E, Santolini R. Delphi-based change assessment in ecosystem services values to support strategic spatial planning in Italian landscapes. Ecol Ind. 2012;21:134–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Seppelt R, Dormann CF, Eppink FV, Lautenbach S, Schmidt S. A quantitative review of ecosystem services studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J Appl Ecol. 2011;48:630–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sheppard SRJ, Meitner M. Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. For Ecol Manage. 2005;207:171–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sherrouse BC, Clement JM, Semmens DJ. A GIS application for assessing, mapping and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Appl Geogr. 2011;31:748–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Ind. 2009;9:189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Southern A, Lovett A, O’Riordan T, Watkinson A. Sustainable landscape governance: lessons from a catchment based study in whole landscape design. Landscape Urban Plan. 2011;101:179–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Steingröver EG, Geertsema W, Van Wingerden WKRE. Designing agricultural landscapes for natural pest control: a transdisciplinary approach in the HoekscheWaard (The Netherlands). Landscape Ecol. 2010;25:825–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stephenson J. The cultural values model: an integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landscape Urban Plan. 2008;84:127–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Syrbe R-U, Walz U. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecol Ind. 2012;21:80–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tallis H, Polasky S. Mapping and Valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management. The year in Ecology and Conservation Biology, Ann NY Acad Sci. 2009;1162:265–283.Google Scholar
  87. Taylor Lovell S, Johnston DM. Designing landscapes for performance based on emerging principles of landscape ecology. Ecol Soc. 2009;14(1):44. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art44/.Google Scholar
  88. Termorshuizen J, Opdam P. Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landscape Ecol. 2009;24:1037–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Turner MG. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1989;20:171–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kazmierczak A, Niemela J, James Ph. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure: a literature review. Landscape Urban Plan. 2007;81:167–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Van Berkel DB, Carvalho-Ribeiro S, Verburg PH, Lovett A. Identifying assets and constraints for rural development with qualitative scenarios: a case study of Castro Laboreiro, Portugal. Landscape Urban Plan. 2011;102:127–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Van Bommel S, Röling NG, Aarts MNC, Turnhout E. Social learning for solving complex problems: a promising solution or wishful thinking? A case study of multi-actor negotiation for the integrated management and sustainable use of the Drentschea area in the Netherlands. Environ Policy Gov. 2009;19:400–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Vikervaara P, Kumpula T, Tanskanen A, Burkhard B. Ecosystem services-A tool for sustainable management of human-environment systems. Case study finnish forest Lapland. Ecol Complex. 2010;7:410–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Vos CC, Verboom J, Opdam PFM, TerBraak CJF. Towards ecologically scaled landscape indices. Am Nat. 2001;157:24–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wallace KJ. Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biol Conserv. 2007;139:235–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Walker B, Salt D. Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington: Island Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  97. Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 2004;9(2):5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5.Google Scholar
  98. Walker BH, Anderies JM, Kinzig AP, Ryan P. Exploring resilience in social-ecological systems through comparative studies and theory development: introduction to the special issue. Ecol Soc. 2006;11(1):12. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art12/.
  99. Ward Thompson Ch. Landscape and health: the recurring theme. Landscape Urban Plan. 2011;99:187–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Wilson MA, Howarth RB. Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services: establishing fair outcomes through group deliberation. Ecol Econ. 2002;41:431–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wu J, Hobbs R. Landscape ecology: the state of the science. In: Wu J, Hobbs R, editors. Key topics in landscape ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Land Use Planning Chair Group and Nature and Society GroupWageningen University and ALTERRAWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations