Superspace Description of the System Bi2(n+2)MonO6(n+1) (n=3, 4, 5 and 6)

Conference paper


The system Bi2(n+2)Mo n O6(n+1) is described with the superspace formalism. Considering the cationic distribution of the member with n=3, a superspace model is constructed beginning with a model previously proposed for the compound Bi2MoO6. The description of even members requires additional modifications. As a result, two superspace models are proposed for the different members of this system, depending on the parity of the parameter n. Both models have been checked through the Rietveld method combining synchrotron and neutron powder diffraction data.


Cationic Distribution Rietveld Method Modulation Vector Aurivillius Phase Superspace Formalism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors are grateful to J. Galy, A.R. Landa-Cánovas and J. Hernández-Velasco for their helpful discussions. This work was supported by the Basque Government (project IT-282-07). This work was also supported by the European Community—Research Infrastructure Action under the FP6: “Structuring the European Research Area” (“Integrating Activity on Synchrotron and Free Electron Laser Science” (IA-SFS) RII3-CT-2004-506008). PJB also thanks Basque Government for financial support. Adapted from [1] with permission of the IUCr.


  1. 1.
    Bereciartua PJ, Zuñiga FJ, Perez-Mato JM, Petříček V, Vila E, Castro A, Rodríguez-Carvajal J, Doyle S (2012) Structure refinement and superspace description of the system Bi2(n+2)MonO6(n+1) (n=3, 4, 5 and 6). Acta Crystallogr, Sect B 68(4):323–340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boullay P, Trolliard G, Mercurio D, Perez-Mato JM, Elcoro L (2002) Toward a unified approach to the crystal chemistry of Aurivillius-type compounds, I: the structural model. J Solid State Chem 164:252–260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boullay P, Trolliard G, Mercurio D, Perez-Mato JM, Elcoro L (2002) Toward a unified approach to the crystal chemistry of Aurivillius-type compounds, I: Bi7Ti4NbO21, a case study. J Solid State Chem 164:261–271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van den Elzen AF, Rieck GD (1973) The crystal structure of Bi2(MoO4)3. Acta Crystallogr, Sect B 29:2433–2436 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Galy J, Hernández-Velasco J, Landa-Cánovas AR, Vila E, Castro A (2009) Ab initio structure determination and Rietveld refinement of Bi10Mo3O24 the member n=3 of the Bi(2n+4)MonO6(n+1) series. J Solid State Chem 182:1177–1187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Landa-Cánovas AR, Vila E, Hernández-Velasco J, Galy J, Castro A (2009) Structural elucidation of the Bi2(n+2)MonO6(n+1) (n=3, 4, 5 and 6) family of fluorite superstructures by transmission electron microscopy. Acta Crystallogr, Sect B 65:458–466 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vila E, Landa-Canovas AR, Galy J, Iglesias JE, Castro A (2007) Bi2n+4MonO6(n+1) with n=3, 4, 5, 6: a new series of low-temperature stable phases in the mBi2O3–MoO3 system (1.0<m<1.7): structural relationships and conductor properties. J Solid State Chem 180:661–669 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Physics of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech RepublicPrahaCzech Republic
  2. 2.Department of Condensed Matter PhysicsUniversity of the Basque CountryBilbaoSpain
  3. 3.Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (ICMM, CSIC)MadridSpain
  4. 4.Institut Laue-LangevinGrenobleFrance
  5. 5.Institute for Synchrotron Radiation (ISS)ANKAEggenstein-LeopoldshafenGermany

Personalised recommendations