Advertisement

Are Ethics and Efficiency Locked in Antithesis?

  • Yasha Rohwer
  • Randall WestgrenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the The International Library of Environmental, Agricultural and Food Ethics book series (LEAF, volume 20)

Abstract

We argue that ethics and efficiency are not locked in antitheses; that is, we argue that ethics and efficiency are not related in a fixed way. To do this we first argue that we have obligations to other human beings, animals and the environment. These obligations can be grounded in a number of moral theories that share a common normative outcome. We then explicate two conceptions of how ethics and efficiency may and actually do coexist in the food market. We argue that our moral obligations must be included in analyses of the behavior and performance of agri-food markets and that these duties do not lead to inefficiency, per se. At a minimum, they represent a set of constraints on production to which efficient producers adhere. We also note that there are markets for ethically produced foods, ranging from Fair Trade commodities to organic vegetables, wherein producers and consumers discover the prices of ethical attributes in efficient exchange. However, the existence of these markets for ethically produced products does not exhaust our moral obligations. If we have such duties, they must be institutionalized throughout the sector.

Keywords

Fair Trade Ethical Production Moral Obligation Ethical Attribute Hedonic Price 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, A.Y. Lewin, and L.M. Seiford. 1994. Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology, and applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Farrell, M.J. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (A, general) 120: 253–281.Google Scholar
  3. Harsanyi, J. 1975. Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality? The American Political Science Review 69(2): 594–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hobbes, T. 1651. Leviathan or the matter, forme and power of a common wealth ecclesiasticall and civil. London: Andrew Cooke.Google Scholar
  5. Johnson, R. 2008. Kant’s moral philosophy. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kant, I. 1971. The doctrine of virtue. Part II of the metaphysics of morals. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kant, I. 1998. The groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Korsgaard, C. 1996. The sources of normativity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lancaster, K.J. 1966. A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy 74: 132–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lenz, J.E., R.C. Mittelhammer, and H. Shi. 1994. Retail level hedonics and the valuation of milk components. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76: 492–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mill, J.-S. 1993. On liberty and utilitarianism. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  12. Moore, G.E. 1903. Principia ethica. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Murillo-Zamorano, L.R. 2004. Economic efficiency and frontier techniques. Journal of Economic Surveys 18: 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rachels, J., and S. Rachels. 2012. The elements of moral philosophy. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Ratchford, B.T. 1975. The new economic theory of consumer behaviour: An interpretive essay. The Journal of Consumer Research 2: 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Raynolds, L.T., D.L. Murray, and J. Wilkinson. 2007. Fair trade: The challenges of transforming globalization. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Rawls, J. 1989. Themes in Kant’s moral philosophy. In Kant’s transcendental deductions, ed. E. Förster, 81–113. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Rosen, S. 1974. Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy 82: 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Scott, W.R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Shafer-Landau, R. 2012. The fundamentals of ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Singer, P. 1975. Animal liberation. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
  23. Westgren, R.E. 1999. Delivering food safety, food quality, and sustainable production practices: The Label Rouge poultry system in France. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(5): 1107–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural & Applied EconomicsUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations