From Entrepreneurialism to Innovation: Research, Critique, and the Innovation Union

Chapter
Part of the Educational Research book series (EDRE, volume 7)

Abstract

Naomi Hodgson discusses ‘From Entrepreneurialism to Innovation: Research, Critique, and the Innovation Union’ (Chap. 14). In the process of integration, Europe has been reframed as a different space. The Lisbon Strategy, which aimed to make the EU the most competitive and dynamic knowledge economy in the world, has recently been superseded by strategies for the creation of an Innovation Union. The recasting of the European Union as an Innovation Union recasts the role of the university and of the researcher. The shift not only affects institutions usually associated with knowledge production however; innovation is now a priority across all policy areas and for all actors to be able to adapt to and survive in current conditions. The creation of an Innovation Union brings about shifts of emphasis from a general entrepreneurialism to a more focused innovation and from learning to research. Current regimes of performance have been argued to effect an immunisation and thus a stifling, or domestication, of critique. The Innovation Union is constituted as a space by devices for measuring innovation and by actors acting in the name of such performance measures. The innovative researcher required of this space is a mobile, adaptable individual seeking permanently to rethink how she does what she does in the name of efficiency, sustainability and responsibility, for which she requires permanent feedback. The possibility of resisting this mode of governance requires a reorientation of the researcher’s attitude to the present. This is explored with reference to the reconceptualisation of the university by Jan Masschelein and Maarten Simons and the attitude of exposition found in the work of Michel Foucault and Bruno Latour.

Keywords

Knowledge Economy Lisbon Strategy Learning Society Societal Challenge Smart Specialisation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allen, A. (2011). The idea of a world university: Can Foucauldian research offer a vision of educational futures. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 19(3), 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Council of European the Communities. (2006). Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: Education, research, and innovation. Brussels, Belgium: Council of European the Communities. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2006:0208:FIN:EN:PDF. Last accessed 17 May 2012.
  3. Delanty, G. (2003). Citizenship as a learning process: Disciplinary citizenship versus cultural citizenship. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 22(6), 597–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020 flagship initiative: Innovation Union. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/innovation-union-communication_en.pdf#view=fit&pagemode=none. Last accessed 17 May 2012.
  5. Fejes, A. (2008). European citizens under construction: The Bologna process analysed from a governmentality perspective. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40(4), 515–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Foucault, M. (2000). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984 Vol. 1: Ethics. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  7. Heid, H. (2004). The domestication of critique: Problems of justifying the critical in the context of educationally relevant thought and action. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38(3), 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kant, I. (1977). An answer to the question: “What is Enlightenment?”. In H. Reiss (Ed.), Kant’s political writings (H. B. Nisbet, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1784).Google Scholar
  9. Latour, B. (2010). An attempt at a “compositionist manifesto”. New Literary History, 41, 471–490.Google Scholar
  10. Masschelein, J. (2004). How to conceive of critical educational theory today? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 38(3), 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Masschelein, J. (2007). Experience and the limits of governmentality. In J. Masschelein, M. Simons, U. Brockling, & L. Pongratz (Eds.), The learning society from the perspective of governmentality (pp. 147–161). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2002). An adequate education in a globalised world? A note on immunisation against being-together. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36(4), 589–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Masschelein, J., & Simons, M. (2009). From active citizenship to world citizenship: A proposal for a world university. European Educational Research Journal, 8(2), 236–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Masschelein, M., Simons, M., Brockling, U., & Pongratz, L. (Eds.). (2007). The learning society from the perspective of governmentality. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Rabinow, P., & Rose, N. (2003). Foucault today. In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The essential Foucault: Selections from the essential works of Foucault (pp. 1954–1984). New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  16. Rancière, J. (1991). The ignorant schoolmaster (K. Ross, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2008a). From schools to learning environments: The dark side of being exceptional. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 42(3–4), 687–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2008b). “It makes us believe it is about our freedom”: Notes on the irony of the learning apparatus. In P. Smeyers & M. Depaepe (Eds.), Educational research: The educationalisation of social problems. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2010). Governmental, political, and pedagogic subjectivation: Foucault with Rancière. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 42(5–6), 588–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Simons, M., Olssen, M., & Peters, M. (2009). Re-reading education policies. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EducationUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations