Extending the Reach of Molecular Replacement

  • Randy J. Read
  • Airlie J. McCoy
  • Robert D. Oeffner
  • Gábor Bunkóczi
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology book series (NAPSA)

Abstract

Molecular replacement is already able to solve the majority of structures in the Protein Data Bank, thanks to the rapidly increasing number of template structures available and continuous improvements in the algorithms. Chances of success can be optimised by proper preparation of models, for instance by trimming poorly-conserved regions, creating an ensemble of alternative models or applying advanced homology modeling tools. The sensitivity of the molecular replacement search can be improved by using likelihood targets; these lend themselves to automation, which makes it possible to carry out extensive searches and helps to avoid user errors. The convergence radius of model completion can be extended by using methods that smoothly deform the starting model or apply advanced modeling techniques. Even more difficult structures can be solved by combining molecular replacement with other phasing methods, such as SAD phasing or multi-crystal averaging.

Keywords

Molecular replacement Likelihood Molecular modeling SAD phasing Multi-crystal averaging 

References

  1. 1.
    Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkóczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, Headd JJ, Hung L-W, Kapral GJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, McCoy AJ, Moriarty NW, Oeffner R, Read RJ, Richardson DC, Richardson JS, Terwilliger TC, Zwart PH (2010) PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D 66:213–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brunger AT, Das D, Deacon AM, Grant J, Terwilliger TC, Read RJ, Adams PD, Levitt M, Schröder GF (2012) Application of DEN-refinement and automated model-building to a difficult case of molecular replacement phasing: the structure of a putative succinyl-diaminopimelate desuccinylase from Corynebacterium glutamicum. Acta Crystallogr D 68:391–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bunkóczi G, Read RJ (2011) Improvement of molecular replacement models with Sculptor. Acta Crystallogr D 67:303–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    DiMaio F, Terwilliger TC, Read RJ, Wlodawer A, Oberdorfer G, Wagner U, Valkov E, Alon A, Fass D, Axelrod HL, Das D, Vorobiev SM, Iwaï H, Pokkuluri PR, Baker D (2011) Improving molecular replacement by density- and energy-guided protein structure optimization. Nature 473:540–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Glykos NM, Kokkinidis M (2001) Multidimensional molecular replacement. Acta Crystallogr D 57:1462–1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keegan RM, Winn MD (2008) MrBUMP: an automated pipeline for molecular replacement. Acta Crystallogr D 64:119–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kendrew JC, Bodo G, Dintzis HM, Parrish RG, Wyckoff H, Phillips DC (1958) A three-dimensional model of the myoglobin molecule obtained by x-ray analysis. Nature 181:662–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kissinger CR, Gehlhaar DK, Fogel DB (1999) Rapid automated molecular replacement by evolutionary search. Acta Crystallogr D 55:484–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lebedev AA, Vagin AA, Murshudov G (2008) Model preparation in MOLREP and examples of model improvements using X-ray data. Acta Crystallogr D 64:33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Long F, Vagin AA, Young P, Murshudov G (2007) BALBES: a molecular-replacement pipeline. Acta Crystallogr D 64:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCoy AJ (2004) Liking likelihood. Acta Crystallogr D 60:2169–2183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McCoy AJ, Read RJ (2010) Experimental phasing: best practice and pitfalls. Acta Crystallogr D 66:458–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Storoni LC, Read RJ (2005) Likelihood-enhanced fast translation functions. Acta Crystallogr D 61:458–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD, Winn MD, Storoni LC, Read RJ (2007) Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallogr 40:658–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Murshudov GN, Skubák P, Lebedev AA, Pannu NS, Steiner RA, Nicholls RA, Winn MD, Long F, Vagin AA (2011) REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr D 67:355–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Perutz MF, Rossmann MG, Cullis AF, Muirhead H, Will G, North AC (1960) Structure of haemoglobin: a three-dimensional Fourier synthesis at 5.5-Å resolution, obtained by X-ray analysis. Nature 185:416–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Qian B, Raman S, Das R, Bradley P, McCoy AJ, Read RJ, Baker D (2007) High-resolution structure prediction and the crystallographic phase problem. Nature 450:259–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Read RJ (2001) Pushing the boundaries of molecular replacement with maximum likelihood. Acta Crystallogr D 57:1373–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Read RJ, McCoy AJ (2011) Using SAD data in Phaser. Acta Crystallogr D 67:338–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rigden DJ, Keegan RM, Winn MD (2008) Molecular replacement using ab initio polyalanine models generated with ROSETTA. Acta Crystallogr D 64:1288–1291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rodríguez DD, Grosse C, Himmel S, González C, de Ilarduya IM, Becker S, Sheldrick GM, Usón I (2009) Crystallographic ab initio protein structure solution below atomic resolution. Nat Methods 6:651–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rossmann MG (1972) The molecular replacement method. Gordon & Breach, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schröder GF, Levitt M, Brunger AT (2010) Super-resolution biomolecular crystallography with low-resolution data. Nature 464:1218–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schwarzenbacher R, Godzik A, Grzechnik SK, Jaroszewski L (2004) The importance of alignment accuracy for molecular replacement. Acta Crystallogr D 60:1229–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Storoni LC, McCoy AJ, Read RJ (2004) Likelihood-enhanced fast rotation functions. Acta Crystallogr D 60:432–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Terwilliger TC, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Afonine PV, Moriarty NW, Zwart PH, Hung L-W, Read RJ, Adams PD (2008) Iterative model building, structure refinement and density modification with the Phenix AutoBuild wizard. Acta Crystallogr D 64:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Terwilliger TC, DiMaio F, Read RJ, Baker D, Bunkóczi G, Adams PD, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Afonine PV, Echols N (2012) phenix.mr_rosetta: molecular replacement and model rebuilding with Phenix and Rosetta. J Struct Funct Genomics 13(2):81–90. doi:10.1007/s10969-012-9129-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vagin A, Teplyakov A (1997) MOLREP: an automated program for molecular replacement. J Appl Crystallogr 30:1022–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhou A, Carrell RW, Murphy MP, Wei Z, Yan Y, Stanley PLD, Stein PE, Broughton Pipkin F, Read RJ (2010) A redox switch in angiotensinogen modulates angiotensin release. Nature 468:108–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Randy J. Read
    • 1
    • 2
  • Airlie J. McCoy
    • 1
    • 2
  • Robert D. Oeffner
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gábor Bunkóczi
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of HaematologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Cambridge Institute for Medical ResearchCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations