Advertisement

Towards Best Practice for Benefit Sharing Involving Access to Human Biological Resources: Conclusions and Recommendations

  • Doris SchroederEmail author
  • Julie Cook Lucas
Chapter

Abstract

Scientific advancement without benefit sharing is unjust. Those who believe that every human being has a right to share in the fruits of science will apply this claim universally. While we fully support the universal human right to benefit from scientific research, there is an urgent need to deal with the potential exploitation of resource providers and research participants. Therefore, in this book we have taken a narrower position: those who contribute to the advancement of science need to receive a benefit in return. This chapter gives our conclusions and recommendations.

Keywords

Benefit sharing Human Genetic Resources Justice Developing Countries Traditional Knowledge 

References

  1. CBD (1992) Convention on Biological Diversity. http://www.cbd.int/convention/text
  2. CBD (2010) Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity. http://www.cbd.int/abs/doc/protocol/nagoya-protocol-en.pdf
  3. CIOMS (2002) International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. http://www.cioms.ch/publications/layout_guide2002.pdf
  4. Diallo DA, Doumbo OK, Plowe CV, Wellems TE, Emanuel EJ, Hurst SA (2005) Community permission for medical research in developing countries. Clin Infect Dis 41:255–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harmon A (2010) Where’d you go with my DNA? The New York Times, 24 April. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/25/weekinreview/25harmon.html?pagewanted=all
  6. ICESCR (1966) International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/a_cescr.htm
  7. Kowal E (2012) Genetic research in indigenous health: Significant progress, substantial challenges. Med J Aust 197(1):19–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mayer R (2007) What’s wrong with exploitation? J Appl Philos 24(2):137–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. UN (1948) Universal Declaration of Human Rights. United Nations. http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/
  10. UNESCO (2005) Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. Adopted by the General Conference of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 33rd Session, 19 Oct. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html
  11. World Bank (2011) World development report 2012: Gender equality and development. World Bank, Washington, DC. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWDR2012/Resources/7778105-1299699968583/7786210-1315936222006/Complete-Report.pdf
  12. World Health Assembly (2011) The Pandemic Influenza Preparedness (PIP) Framework for the sharing of influenza viruses and access to vaccines and other benefits. http://www.who.int/influenza/pip/en/
  13. WMA (2008) Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Adopted by the 18th World Medical Association General Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964, latest revision by the 59th WMA General Assembly, Seoul, Korea, October. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UCLAN, Centre for Professional EthicsPrestonUK

Personalised recommendations