Responding to Flood Risk in the UK

Chapter
Part of the Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research book series (NTHR, volume 33)

Abstract

This chapter considers the response of UK householders to the country’s most widespread and damaging natural hazard, flooding. Although flood risk affects 3 million UK residents and major floods in 1998, 2000, 2005, 2007 and 2009 received extensive media coverage, few at-risk householders take any action to reduce their risk exposure. Research conducted in London, Reading and Leeds suggests that people who have insufficient confidence in their ability to manage their exposure to the material impacts of flooding choose instead to adopt anxiety-avoidance strategies such as blame and fatalism. These strategies protect social representations that enable citizens to achieve a feeling of safety in their lives but they also de-legitimise the discourse of risk mitigation. The research suggests that protection of self-identity and social identity also play a role. Only when traumatic or repeated experiences of flooding force changes to identity and make the retention of old representations untenable are these psychological strategies abandoned. When this occurs, individuals either learn to accept the existence of the risk or else fall into a state of disabling anxiety.

Keywords

Social Identity Flood Risk Mitigation Measure Social Identity Theory Flood Risk Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abrams D, Hogg M (1990) An introduction to the social identity approach. Harvester Wheatsheaf, HertfordshireGoogle Scholar
  2. Abric JC (1984) A theoretical and experimental approach to the study of social representations in a situation of interaction. In: Farr R, Moscovici S (eds) Social representations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 169–183Google Scholar
  3. Austin J (1962) How to do things with words. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagozzi RP, Baumgartner H, Pieters R, Zeelenberg M (2000) The role of emotions in goal-directed behavior. In: Ratneshwar S, Mick DG, Huffman C (eds) The why of consumption: contemporary perspectives on consumer motives, goals, and desires. Routledge, New York, pp 36–58Google Scholar
  5. Bangerter A (2000) Transformation between scientific and social representations of conception: the method of serial reproduction. Br J Soc Psychol 39(4):521–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bickerstaff K, Walker G (2002) Risk, responsibility and blame: an analysis of vocabularies of motive in air-pollution(ing) discourses. Environ Plan A 34(12):2175–2192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bohrnstedt GW, Knoke D (1984) Statistics for social data analysis, 3rd edn. F E Peacock Publishers, ItascaGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown TC, Petersen GL, Brodersen MR, Ford V, Bell PA (2005) The judged seriousness of an environmental loss is a matter of what caused it. J Environ Psychol 25(1):13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper C (1976) The house as symbol of the self. In: Proshansky HH, Ittelson WH, Rivlin LG (eds) Environmental psychology: people and their settings, 2nd edn. Hold, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp 435–448Google Scholar
  10. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2005) Making space for water: taking forward a new government strategy for flood and coastal erosion risk management in England. Defra Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2008a) Consultation for policy options for promoting property-level flood protection and resilience. Defra, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2008b) Resilience grants pilot projects: executive summary. Defra, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Dua J, Scott W (2001) Manual for the post-traumatic stress scale. Psych Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  14. Dupuis A, Thorns DC (1998) Home, home ownership and the search for ontological security. Sociol Rev 46(1):24–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Earle TC (2010) Trust in risk management: a model-based review of empirical research. Risk Anal 30(4):541–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Evans E, Ashley R, Hall J, Penning-Rowsell E, Saul A, Sayers P, Thorne C, Watkinson A (2004) Foresight, future flooding. scientific summary, vol I, Future risks and their drivers. Office of Science and Technology, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Fairclough N (2003) Analysing discourse: textual analysis for social research. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Giddens A (1991) Modernity and self-identity. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Greater London Authority (2010) Proposal for an investigation into rain and river flood risk management in London. Executive Director of Secretariat, Greater London Authority. http://legacy.london.gov.uk/assembly/envmtgs/2010/jul15/item10.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2010
  20. Grothmann T, Reusswig F (2006) People at risk of flooding: why some residents take precautionary action while others do not. Nat Hazard 38(1–2):101–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guardian (1998) The flood of the century. The Guardian, 13 Apr 1998, p. 8Google Scholar
  22. Halliday M (1994) An introduction to functional grammar. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Harries T (2008a) Householder responses to flood risk: the consequences of the search for ontological security. Doctoral dissertation. Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University, EnfieldGoogle Scholar
  24. Harries T (2008b) Feeling secure or being secure? Why it can seem sensible not to protect yourself against a natural hazard. Health Risk Soc 10(5):479–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harries T (2009) Understanding barriers and incentives for Retrofitted household flood protection and resilience (Joint Defra/EA Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management R&D Programme). Defra, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Harries T (2010a) Summary of findings: national flood forum 2010 survey of flooded individuals. National Flood Forum. http://floodforum.org.uk/files/Summary%20of%20findings.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2010
  27. Harries T (2010b) Review of the pilot flood protection grant scheme in a recently flooded area (Joint Defra/EA Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management R&D Programme). Defra, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Harries T (2012) The anticipated emotional consequences of adaptive behaviour: impacts on the take-up of household flood-protection protective measures. Environ Plan A 44(3):649–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hewitt K (1983) The idea of calamity in a technocratic age. In: Hewitt K (ed) Interpretations of calamity: from the viewpoint of human ecology. Allen & Unwin, London, pp 4–32Google Scholar
  30. Hogg M, Abrams D (1988) Social identification: a social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson C, Tunstall S, Penning-Rowsell E (2005) Floods as catalysts for policy change: historical lessons from England and Wales. Int J Water Res Dev 21(4):561–575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson C, Tunstall S, Penning-Rowsell E (2008) Crises as catalysts for adaptation: human response to major floods report for the ESRC environment and human behaviour new opportunities programme. Flood Hazard Research Centre, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Joseph S, Williams R, Yule W (1997) Understanding post-traumatic stress: a psychosocial perspective on PTSD and treatment. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  34. Laska S (1990) Homeowner adaptation to flooding: an application of the general hazards coping theory. Environ Behav 22(3):320–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lindbladh E, Lyttkens CH (2002) Habit versus choice: the process of decision-making in health-related behaviour. Soc Sci Med 55(3):451–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. London Assembly (2002) Flooding in London: a London assembly scrutiny report. http://legacy.london.gov.uk/assembly/reports/environment/flooding.pdf. Accessed 20 Sept 2010
  37. Loomes G, Sugden R (1982) Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econ J 92(368):805–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Macnaghten P, Urry J (1995) Towards a sociology of nature. Sociology 29(2):203–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mallett S (2004) Understanding home: a critical review of the literature. Sociol Rev 52(1):62–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Market Research Society (2002) Occupation groupings: a job dictionary, 5th edn. The Market Research Society, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. McCarthy JJ, Canziani OF, Leary NA, Dokken DJ, White KS (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Morreall J (1983) Taking laughter seriously. SUNY, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  43. Observer (2007) After the deluge, Britain will be swamped by a £6bn tidal wave of costs. http://observer.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,,2136756,00.html. Accessed 30 July 2007
  44. Ohl CA, Tapsell SM (2000) Flooding and human health: the dangers posed are not always obvious. Br Med J 321(11):1167–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pitt M (2008) Learning lessons from the 2007 floods: an independent review by Sir Michael Pitt. Cabinet Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
  46. Potter J, Wetherell M (1987) Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behaviour. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  47. Raco M, Imrie R (2000) Governmentality and rights and responsibilities in urban policy. Environ Plan A 32(12):2187–2204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rogers EM (1987) The diffusions of innovations perspective. In: Weinstein ND (ed) Understanding and encouraging self-protective behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rousseau DM, Sitkin SB, Burt RS, Camerer C (1998) Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Acad Manage Rev 23(3):344–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. RPA, EFTEC, CASPAR and Flood Hazard Research Centre (2004) The appraisal of human-related intangible impacts of flooding. Defra, LondonGoogle Scholar
  51. Saunders P (1989) The meaning of “home” in contemporary English culture. Hous Stud 4(3):177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Siegrist M, Gutscher H (2008) Natural hazards and motivation for mitigation behavior: people cannot predict the affect evoked by a severe flood. Risk Anal 28(3):771–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Slovic P (2000) Introduction and overview. In: Slovic P (ed) The perception of risk. Earthscan, London, pp 21–37Google Scholar
  54. Slovic P, Finucane M, Peters M, Macgregor DG (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal 24(2):311–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith SG (1994) The essential qualities of the home. J Environ Psychol 14(1):31–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith K, Ward R (1998) Floods: physical processes and human impacts. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  57. Soper K (1995) What is nature? Culture, politics and the non-human. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  58. Tajfel H (1972) La categorisation sociale. In: Moscovici S (ed) Introduction á la Psychologie Sociale, vol 1. Larousse, ParisGoogle Scholar
  59. Tajfel H (1982) Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  60. Tapsell S, Tunstall SM, Penning-Rowsell EC, Handmer JW (1999) The health effects of the 1998 easter flooding in Banbury and Kidlington. Flood Hazard Research Centre, EnfieldGoogle Scholar
  61. Thurston N, Finlinson B, Breakspear R, Williams N, Shaw J, Chatterton J (2008) Developing the evidence base for flood resilience. R&D Technical Report FD2607/TR. Defra, LondonGoogle Scholar
  62. Tuan YF (1974) Space and place: humanistic perspective. Prog Geogr 66(2):233–246Google Scholar
  63. Tunstall S, Tapsell S, Green C, Floyd P, George C (2006) The health effects of flooding: social research results from England and Wales. J Water Health 4(3):365–380Google Scholar
  64. Turner JC (1982) Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In: Tajfel H (ed) Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  65. Turner JC (1985) Social categorization and the self-concept: a social cognitive theory of group behaviour. In: Lawler EJ (ed) Advances in group processes: theory and research, vol 2. JAI Press, GreenwichGoogle Scholar
  66. Tykocinski O, Pittman T (1998) The consequences of doing nothing: inaction inertia as avoidance of anticipated counterfactual regret. J Pers Soc Psychol 75(3):607–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilkinson I (2001) Anxiety in a risk society. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  68. Wittgenstein L (1958) Philosophical investigations. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  69. World Health Organisation (2002) Floods: climate change and adaptation strategies for human health, meeting report. WHO Regional Office for Europe, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  70. Zeelenberg M, van den Bos K, van Dijk E, Pieters R (2002) The inaction effect in the psychology of regret. J Pers Soc Psychol 82(3):314–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Behaviour and Practice Research Group, Business SchoolKingston University LondonKingston-upon-ThamesUK

Personalised recommendations