Advertisement

Viscous-Flow Calculations for Model and Full-Scale Current Loads on Typical Offshore Structures

  • A. H. KoopEmail author
  • C. M. Klaij
  • G. Vaz
Part of the Computational Methods in Applied Sciences book series (COMPUTMETHODS, volume 29)

Abstract

In this paper, CFD calculations for current loads on an LNG carrier and a semi-submersible are presented, both for model and full-scale situations, for current angles ranging from 180 to 0 degrees. MARIN’s in-house URANS code ReFRESCO is used. Numerical studies are carried out concerning iterative convergence and grid refinement. In total, more than 100 calculations have been performed. Detailed verification analysis is carried out using modern techniques, and numerical uncertainties are calculated. Afterwards, quantitative validation for model-scale Reynolds number is done taking into account numerical and experimental uncertainties. Scale effects on the current coefficients are investigated, having in mind the estimated numerical uncertainties, and unsteady effects are briefly studied. Good iterative convergence is obtained in most calculations, i.e. a decrease in residuals of more than 5 orders is achieved. The sensitivity to grid resolution has been investigated for both model and full scale using five consecutively refined grids and for 3 current headings. The differences in the solution between two consecutive refinements converge for all cases. The numerical uncertainties are larger for angles with small values of the loads. Comparison with experiments shows that ReFRESCO provides good quantitative prediction of the current loads at model scale: for angles with larger forces the CFD results are validated with 15 % of uncertainty. To determine scale effects the numerical uncertainties must be considered in order to prevent wrong conclusions drawn on basis of numerical differences rather than on physical differences. For the full-scale results larger numerical uncertainties are found than for model scale and for absolute values for scale effects this uncertainty should be improved. For the LNG carrier significant scale effects, i.e. more than 40 %, have been obtained for current angles where the friction component is dominant. For these cases the numerical uncertainty is relatively low. For the other current angles differences of 8–30 % between model and full scale can be observed, but here larger numerical uncertainties are found. For the semi-submersible the numerical uncertainties for the full-scale results are larger than for the LNG carrier. For the semi-submersible the pressure component of the force is highly dominant, i.e. larger than 90 % of the total force. On average the full-scale current coefficients are 20 % lower than at model scale, but larger differences for a number of angles can be observed.

Keywords

CFD RANS Current loads Verification Validation Scale effects LNG carrier Semi-submersible 

References

  1. 1.
    Vaz G, Waals O, Fathi F, Ottens H, Le Souef T, Kwong K (2009) Current affairs—model tests, semi-empirical predictions and CFD computations for current coefficients of semi-submersibles. In: Proceedings of OMAE2009, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eça L, Vaz G, Hoekstra M (2010) A verification and validation exercise for the flow over a backward facing step. In: Proceedings of ECCOMAS-CFD2010, Lisbon, Portugal Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vaz G, Jaouen F, Hoekstra M (2009) Free-surface viscous flow computations. Validation of URANS code FreSCo. In: Proceedings of OMAE2009, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fathi F, Klaij CM, Koop A (2010) Predicting loads on a LNG carrier with CFD. In: Proceedings of OMAE2010, Shanghai, China Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koop A, Bereznitski A (2011) Model-scale and full-scale CFD calculations for current loads on semi-submersible. In: Proceedings of OMAE2011, Rotterdam, The Netherlands Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oil Companies International Marine Forum (1994) Prediction of wind and current loads on VLCCs, 2nd edn Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Waals OJ (2007) Current force measurements on a 135,000 m3 and 224,000 m3 LNG carrier—HAWAII JIP current coefficients. Technical report 19436-1-BT, MARIN Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Koop A, Klaij CM, Vaz G (2010) Predicting wind shielding for FPSO tandem offloading using CFD. In: Proceedings of OMAE2010, Shanghai, China Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vaz G, Toxopeus SL, Holmes S (2010) Calculation of manoeuvring forces on submarines using two viscous-flow solvers. In: Proceedings of OMAE2010, Shanghai, China Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Menter F (1994) Two-equation eddy viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 32:1598–1605 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics (1998) Guide for verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations. Technical report AIAA-G-077-1998, AIAA Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2008) ASME guide on verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics and heat transfer. Technical report ASME Committee PTC-61, ANSI standard V&V-20 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rijpkema D, Vaz G (2011) Viscous flow computations on propulsors: verification, validation and scale effects. In: Proceedings of RINA-CFD2011, London, UK Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Toxopeus SL (2011) Practical application of viscous-flow calculations for the simulation of manoeuvring ships. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, Faculty Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Raven HC, van der Ploeg A, Starke AR, Eça L (2008) Towards a CFD-based prediction of ship performance. Progress in predicting full-scale resistance and scale effects. In: Proceedings of RINA-CFD-2008, London, UK Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Maritime Research Institute Netherlands (MARIN)WageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations