The Interpretationism of Alfred Schutz or How Woodcutting Can Have Referential and Non-referential Meaning

Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 68)

Abstract

Without explicit connection with 19th C. traditional or with 20th C. “new hermeneutics” of Heidegger et al., Schutz nevertheless emphasizes interpretation. Electronic searching of the oeuvre in English shows that he recognizes interpretation of texts and then also a distinction holding beyond language of what can be called “referential” and “non-referential” meaning, but does not consider all experience interpretive and is hence not an extreme interpretationist.

Keywords

Subjective Interpretation Narrow Signification Objective Meaning Subjective Meaning Hermeneutic Phenomenology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Embree, L. 2006. La economia en el contexto de la theoria de la ciencia de Alfred Schutz. Arete Revista de Filosofia XVIII(2): 309–322.Google Scholar
  2. Embree, L. 2009. Economics in the context of Alfred Schutz’s theory of science. Schutzian Research I: 165–175.Google Scholar
  3. Gurwitsch, A., and A. Schutz. 1989. Philosophers in exile: The correspondence of Alfred Schutz and Aron Gurwitsch 1939–1959. Trans. J.C. Evans. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Schutz, A. 1962. Collected papers, Vol. I: The problem of social reality, ed. M. Natanson. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  5. Schutz, A. 1964. Collected papers, Vol. II: Studies in social theory, ed. A. Brodersen. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  6. Schutz, A. 1967. Phenomenology of the social world. Trans. G. Walsh and F. Lehnert. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Schutz, A.1970. Refl ections on the Problem of Relevance, ed. Richard M. Zaner (New Haven: Yale University Press), p. 96.Google Scholar
  8. Schutz, A. 1971. In Reflections on the problem of relevance, ed. R.M. Zaner. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Schutz, A. 1996. Collected papers , Vol. IV, ed. H. Wagner, G. Psathas, and F. Kersten. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schutz, A. 1997. Positivistic philosophy and the actual approach of interpretative social science: An ineditum of Alfred Schutz from spring 1953, ed. L. Embree. Husserl Studies 14(2): 123–149Google Scholar
  11. Seebohm, Th M. 2004. Hermeneutics: Method and methodology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Arts and LettersFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA

Personalised recommendations