Advertisement

Everyday Morality. Questions with and for Alfred Schutz

  • Bernhard WaldenfelsEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Phenomenology book series (CTPH, volume 68)

Abstract

Alfred Schutz’s successful restitution of the social everyday world suffers from a certain moral abstinence which tends to leave the everyday to mere pragmatics. Our paper aims to overcome this shortcoming already noticed by Aron Gurwitsch. The everyday morality we are looking for is highly ambiguous. On the one hand, there is a mere common-sense morality absorbed by what everybody says and does. On the other hand, there is a morality which is incorporated in our everyday world and distributed among various vocational fields like medicine, law, technique or politics, but which exceeds what is common. Our everyday is not simply normal, but results from a process of normalisation. As Max Weber stresses, our everyday world contrasts with what is beyond the everyday. In order to discover this excess we need what Husserl calls an ethical epoché. This break has to be completed by a responsive epoché turning back to the demands to which our common speaking and doing responds. Such a responsive kind of ethics is largely inconspicuous, functioning as a sort of tacit morals. Robert Musil warns us against the over-consumption of morals which would extinguish the sparks of an intensified morality which keep us alive.

Keywords

Everyday Life Everyday World Homo Oeconomicus Moral Absolutism Pure Sociology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barber, M.D. 2004. The participating citizen. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  2. Berger, P. 1983. Das Problem der mannigfaltigen Wirklichkeiten: Alfred Schutz und Robert Musil. In Sozialität und Intersubjektivität. Phänomenologische Perspektiven der Sozialwissenschaften im Umkreis von Aron Gurwitsch und Alfred Schutz, ed. R. Grathoff and B. Waldenfels. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
  3. Berger, P., and T. Luckmann. 1969. Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit. Frankfurt: Fischer.Google Scholar
  4. Bergson, H. 1961. Les deux sources de la morale et de la religion. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  5. Habermas, J. 1981. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, 2 vols. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  6. Husserl, E. 1959. Erste Philosophie (1923/24). Zweiter Teil: Theorie der phänomenologischen Reduktion, Husserliana, vol. VIII. The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  7. Levinas, E. 1974. Autrement qu’être ou au-delà de l’essence. The Hague. English edition: Levinas, E. 1981. Otherwise than being or beyond essence. (trans: A. Lingis). The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  8. Liebsch, B. 1999. Geschichte als Antwort und Versprechen. Freiburg/Munich: Alber.Google Scholar
  9. Luckmann, T. 1973. Philosophie, Sozialwissenschaft und Alltagsleben. Soziale Welt 24(2/3): 137–168.Google Scholar
  10. Musil, R. 1978. Der Mann ohne Eigenschaften. Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  11. Schutz, A. 1962. Collected papers. Vol. I: The problem of social reality, ed. M. Natanson. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  12. Schutz, A. 1964. Collected papers. Vol. II: Studies in social theory, ed. A. Brodersen. The Hague: Martinus Nihhoff.Google Scholar
  13. Schutz, A., and A. Gurwitsch. 1988. Briefwechsel 1939–1959, ed. R. Grathoff. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
  14. Srubar, I. 1988. Kosmion. Die Genese der pragmatischen Lebenswelttheorie von Alfred Schütz und ihr anthropologischer Hintergrund. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  15. Waldenfels, B. 1985. In den Netzen der Lebenswelt. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  16. Waldenfels, B. 1990. Der Stachel des Fremden. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  17. Waldenfels, B. 1994. Antwortregister. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  18. Waldenfels, B. 1995. Wertqualitäten oder Erfahrungsansprüche? In Intentionalität – Werte – Kunst (Husserl • Ingarden • Patočka), ed. J. Bloss, W. Stróžewski, and J. Zumr, 97–106. Prague: Oikumene.Google Scholar
  19. Waldenfels, B. 1996. Order in the twilight. (trans: Parent, D.J.). Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Waldenfels, B. 1999. Vielstimmigkeit der Rede. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  21. Waldenfels, B. 2002. Bruchlinien der Erfahrung. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  22. Waldenfels, B. 2003. Der Fremde und der Heimkehrer. Fremdheitsfiguren bei Alfred Schutz. In Phänomenologie und soziale Wirklichkeit, ed. I. Srubar and S. Vaitkus, 175–188. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Waldenfels, B. 2006. Schattenrisse der Moral. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  24. Weber, M. 1926. Max Weber. Ein Lebensbild. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  25. Weber, M. 1967. Wissenschaft als Beruf. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  26. Weber, M. 1968. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  27. Wittgenstein, L. 1960. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations