Advertisement

No Problem

  • David HilbertEmail author
  • Colin Klein
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Brain and Mind book series (SIBM, volume 6)

Abstract

Pautz refutes tracking intentionalism. We defend it. In what follows we will attempt to undermine the motivation for some of what he says and discuss one of his arguments in more detail. We don’t, however, defend tracking intentionalism because we believe it to be true. There are parts of it we do find plausible (intentionalism with external world content). We defend it, though, because we believe some of Pautz’s criticisms raise interesting questions about how to think about perception that are independent of the truth or falsity of tracking intentionalism.

Keywords

Internal State Neural Response Phenomenal Character External Property Phenomenal Experience 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Bornhöyd, K., M. Quante, et al. 2002. Painful stimuli evoke different stimulus–response functions in the amygdala, prefrontal, insula and somatosensory cortex: A single-trial fMRI study. Brain 125(6): 1326–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coghill, R., C. Sang, J. Maisog, and M. Iadarola. 1999. Pain intensity processing within the human brain: A bilateral, distributed mechanism. Journal of Neurophysiology 82(4): 1934–1943.Google Scholar
  3. Craig, A. 2003. Pain mechanisms: Labeled lines versus convergence in central processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience 26(1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dretske, F.I. 1981. Knowledge and the flow of information. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dretske, F. 1995. Naturalizing the mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gottfried, J.A. 2010. Central mechanisms of odour object perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11(9): 628–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Howard, J.D., J. Plailly, M. Grueschow, J.D. Haynes, and J.A. Gottfried. 2009. Odor quality coding and categorization in human posterior piriform cortex. Nature Neuroscience 12: 932–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Stevenson, R.J., and Donald A. Wilson. 2007. Odour perception: An object-recognition approach. Perception 36: 1821–1833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Vul, E., C. Harris, et al. 2009. Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science 4(3): 274–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Zelano, C., A. Mohanty, et al. 2011. Olfactory predictive codes and stimulus templates in piriform cortex. Neuron 72(1): 178–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations