Policies for Water Demand Management in Israel

Chapter
Part of the Global Issues in Water Policy book series (GLOB, volume 4)

Abstract

Facing chronic water scarcity, Israel has invested heavily in supply augmentation, including cloud seeding, reclamation and reuse of wastewater, and more recently large-scale seawater desalination. Given the physical and technological limitations as well as the economic costs of supply augmentation, Israel has also pursued a wide array of demand management policies. While both supply and demand management policies have always been pursued concomitantly, the relative emphasis placed on each has shifted over the course of the country’s development. In the early years of the country, emphasis was placed on development of existing supplies and large infrastructure projects such as the National Water Carrier. By the 1970s and 1980s, all renewable freshwater resources were exploited, and the focus was more on demand management. Failure to reduce demand, especially during extended droughts, such as those in the 1990s, led to overwithdrawals and a renewed focus on supply augmentation, which, given declines in the cost of desalination, again took precedence at the beginning of the twenty-first century. However, given the costs of desalination, as well as the various environmental and even security impacts associated with it, demand management is still a critical element in Israel’s overall water management strategy.

Keywords

Water Demand Demand Management Municipal Water Water Authority Public Awareness Campaign 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Works Cited

  1. Alpert, P., Krichak, S. O., Shafir, H., Haim, D., & Osetinsky, I. (2008, September). Climatic trends to extremes employing regional modeling and statistical interpretation over the E. Mediterranean. Global and Planetary Change, 63(2–3), 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bar-Shira, Z., Finkelshtain, I., & Simhon, A. 2006. Block-rate versus uniform water pricing in agriculture: An empirical analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(4), 986–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, N. (1995). Value of moving from central planning to a market system: Lessons from the Israeli water sector. Agricultural Economics, 12, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Central Bureau of Statistics. Website: http://cbs.gov.il/. Accessed Mar 2012.
  5. Dahan, M., & Nisan, U. (2007a). The effect of benefits level on take-up rates: Evidence from a natural experiment (CESifo Working Paper No. 1885). Jerusalem: Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  6. Dahan, M., & Nisan, U. (2007b). Unintended consequences of increasing block tariffs pricing policy in urban water. Water Resour Res, 43(3), W03402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dalhuisen, J., Florax, R., Groot, H., & Nijkamp, P. (2003). Price and income elasticities of residential water demand: A meta-analysis. Land Econ, 79, 292–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Darel, Y. (2010, March 22). The drought tax worked: Water consumption dropped by 18%. Ynet news service. Online at: http://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-3866412,00.html
  9. Espey, M., Espey, J., & Shaw, W. D. (1997). Price elasticity of residential demand for water: A meta-analysis. Water Resour Res, 33, 1369–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feitelson, E. (2005). Political economy of groundwater exploitation: The Israeli case. Water Resources Development, 21(3), 413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fishelson, G. (1994). The water market in Israel: An example for increasing the supply. Resource and Energy Economics, 16, 321–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fisher, F. M., & Huber-Lee, A. (2005). Liquid assets: An economic approach for water management and conflict resolution in the Middle East and beyond. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
  13. Grinstein, A., Katz, D., Kronrod, A., & Nisan, U. (2012, May 28). Going beyond carrots and sticks: The effectiveness of demarketing. Paper presented at the 28th annual conference of the Israeli Association for Economics, Tel Aviv.Google Scholar
  14. Hanemann, W. M. (1997). Determinants of urban water use. In D. D. Baumann, J. J. Boland, & W. M. Hanemann (Eds.), Urban water demand management and planning (pp. 31–76). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Heiman, A. (2002). The use of advertising to encourage water conservation theory and empirical evidence. Water Resources Update, 121, 79–86.Google Scholar
  16. Israel Water Authority (2012b). Website: http://water.gov.il/Hebrew/Rates/Pages/Rates.aspx. Accessed 26 Sep 2012.
  17. Israel Water Authority (2012c). Website: http://water.gov.il/Hebrew/Water-saving/Pages/Household.aspx. Accessed 9 Mar 2012.
  18. Israel Water Authority (2012d). Website: http://water.gov.il/Hebrew/Water-saving/Pages/Save-Accessories.aspx. Accessed 9 Mar 2012.
  19. Kislev, Y. (2011). The water economy of Israel. The Taub Center for social policy studies in Israel (Policy Paper No. 2011.15). Jerusalem (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  20. Kislev, Y., & Vaksin, E. (1997). The water economy of Israel – An illustrated review. Rechovot: Center for agricultural economic research (Working Paper, No. 9705). Rehovot: Hebrew University (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  21. Lavee, D. (2008). The economic value of reliability of water supply to agriculture. Water Engineering, 58, 17–25 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  22. Lawrence, P., Meigh, J., & Sullivan, C. (2002). The Water Poverty Index: an international comparison (Keele Economics Research Papers 2002/19). Staffordshire: Keele University.Google Scholar
  23. Margoninsky, Y. (2006). The political economy of rent seeking: The case of Israel’s water sector. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 8(3), 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moore, M. R., & Dinar, A. (1995). Water and land as quantity-rationed inputs in California agriculture – Empirical tests and water policy implications. Land Econ, 71(4), 445–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nauges, C., & Whittington, D. (2010). Estimation of water demand in developing countries: An overview. The World Bank Research Observer, 25, 263–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Neiswiaday, L. M. (1992). Estimating urban residential water demand: Effects of price structures, conservation and education. Water Resource Research, 28(3), 600–615.Google Scholar
  27. Nisan, U. (2006). Problems of economic regulation under conditions of non-uniform prices: An example from regulation of residential water consumption in Israel. Ph.D. dissertation. Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem.Google Scholar
  28. OECD. (2010). Pricing water resources and water and sanitation services. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Olmstead, S., & Stavins, R. (2009). Comparing price and non-price approaches to water conservation. Water Resour Res, 45, W04301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peled, M. (2009, December 30). Survey: 77% of the public do not know how much they will pay for water. Calcalist (in Hebrew). Online at: http://www.calcalist.co.il/local/articles/0,7340,L-3380543,00.html. Accessed 30 Dec 2009.
  31. Renwick, M. E., & Green, R. D. (2000). Do residential water demand side management policies measure up? An analysis of eight California water agencies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40(1), 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shamir, U., & Carmon, N. (2007). Water sensitive planning (WSP): Integrating water considerations into urban and regional planning. Haifa: Center for Urban and Regional Studies, Technion University (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  33. Yaron, D. (1994). An approach to the problem of water allocation to Israel and the Palestinian entity. Resource and Energy Economics, 16, 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zeitouni, N., Becker, N., & Shechter, M. (1994). Models of water market mechanisms and an illustrative application to the Middle East. Resource and Energy Economics, 16, 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and Environmental StudiesUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations