The Wild North: Network Cooperation for Sustainable Tourism in a Fragile Marine Environment in the Arctic Region

  • Sandra Magdalena Granquist
  • Per Åke NilssonEmail author


Rapidly increasing tourist flows to the Arctic North have put focus on the sustainable development of tourism in natural environments. The Wild North project shows how different stakeholders in a network across the Arctic North deal with the need for a development of sustainable use of wildlife in a tourism context by using interdisciplinary research, active cooperation, and exchange of knowledge. The wildlife focused in this international project consists of arctic foxes, whales, seals, and birds. The project demand came from the tourism industry and was taken up by public organizations and academies within nature protection and tourism management. The project has also the maintainability of a destination in focus together with its sustainability.


Wildlife tourism Sustainability Maintainability Code of conduct Triple helix 


  1. Arler F (2002) En helt igennem demokratisk natur (A totally democratic nature). In: Agger P (ed) Naturens værdi (The value of nature). Gad, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballantyne R, Packer J, Hughes K (2009) Tourists’ support for conservation messages and sustainable management practices in wildlife experiences. Tour Manage 30:658–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosetti V, Gerlagh R, Schleicher SP (2009) Modelling sustainable nature – transitions to a sustainable future. Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  4. Briassoulis H (2002) Sustainable tourism and the question of commons. Ann Tour Res 29(4):1065–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cassini MH (2001) Behavioural response of South American fur seals to approach by tourists – a brief report. Appl Anim Behav Sci 71:341–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Catlin J, Jones R (2010) Whale shark tourism at Ningaloo Marine Park: a longitudinal study of wildlife tourism. Tour Manage 31:386–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Curtin S, Richards S, Westcott S (2009) Tourism and grey seals in South Devon: management strategies, voluntary controls and tourists’ perceptions of disturbance. Curr Issues Tour 12(1):59–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fennell D (2007) Ecotourism, 3rd edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, BostonGoogle Scholar
  10. Garrod B, Fennell DA (2004) An analysis of whale watching codes of conduct. Ann Tour Res 31(2):334–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Granquist SM, Nilsson PÅ (2011) Harmony between man and nature: the case of seal watching at Vatnsnes Peninsula, Iceland. Paper presented at the 3rd international conference on solutions on harmonising sustainability and nature protection with socio-economic stability, at Vidzeme University, Valmiera, Latvia, 19 August 2010Google Scholar
  12. Grant M (2002) PACE: guiding rural tourism development in a fragile area. In: Hall D (ed) Tourism in peripheral areas. Channel View Publications, ClevedonGoogle Scholar
  13. Gray B (1989) Collaborating. Finding common ground for multiparty problems. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  14. Gössling S, Hall CM (2006) Uncertainties in predicting tourist flows under scenarios of climate change. Clim Chang 79(3):163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall CM (2008) Tourism planning: policies, processes and relationship. Prentice Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall CM, Lew AA (1998) The geography of sustainable tourism development: an introduction. In: Hall CM, Lew AA (eds) Sustainable tourism: a geographical perspective. Wesley Longman Limited, Harlow, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  17. Hall D, Mitchell M, Roberts L (2003) Tourism and the countryside: dynamic relationship. In: Hall D, Mitchell M, Roberts L (eds) New directions in rural tourism. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 3–18Google Scholar
  18. Hardy AL, Beeton RJS (2001) Sustainable tourism and maintainable tourism: managing resources for more than average outcome. Ann Tour Res 22(1):186–204Google Scholar
  19. Hughes P (2002) Animals, values and tourism – structural shift in UK dolphin tourism provision. Tour Manage 22:321–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hughey K, Ward J, Crawford K, McConnell L, Phillips J, Washbourne R (2004) A classification framework and management approach for the sustainable use of natural assets used for tourism. Tour Manage 25:349–363Google Scholar
  21. Hull J (2001) Opening up the big land to the world. In: Sahlberg B (ed) Going north: peripheral tourism in Canada and Sweden. ETOUR, Ostersund, pp 47–78Google Scholar
  22. Jamal T, Getz D (1995) Collaboration theory and community tourism planning. Ann Tour Res 22(1):186–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson MW, Lavigne DM (1999) Mass tourism and the Mediterranean Monk Seal – the role of mass tourism in decline and possible future extinction of Europe’s most endangered marine mammal, Monachus monachus. Monachus Guard 2(2):1–30Google Scholar
  24. Johnston ME (1995) Patterns and issues in Arctic and Subarctic tourism. In: Hall CM, Johnston ME (eds) Polar tourism. Wiley, Chichester, pp 27–42Google Scholar
  25. Kent CSP, Crabtree B (2008) The effectiveness of an established sanctuary zone for reducing human disturbance to Australian Sea Lions (Neophoca cinerea) at Carnac Island, Western Australia. Tour Marine Environ 14:29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kovacs KM, Innes S (1990) The impact of tourism on harp seals (Phoca groenlandica) in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada. Appl Anim Behav Sci 26(1–2):15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leydesdorff L (2005) The Triple Helix Model and the study of knowledge based innovation. Int J Contemp Sociol 42(1):1–16Google Scholar
  28. Lück M (2007) Nautical tourism development: opportunities and threats. In: Lück M (ed) Nautical tourism: concepts and issues. Cognizant Communication Corporation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Lück M, Higham JES (2008) Marine wildlife and tourism management: scientific approaches to sustainable management. In: Higham JES, Lück M (eds) Marine wildlife and tourism management – insights from the natural and social sciences. Cabi, Wallingford, pp 380–388Google Scholar
  30. Mason P (1997) Tourism codes of conduct in the Arctic and sub Arctic region. J Sustain Tour 5(2):151–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nilsson PÅ (2002) Rekreation of tilgængelighed i et tætbefolket område – brug of attityder i det agrare Danmark (Recration and accessibility in a densely populated are – use and attitudes in the agrarian Denmark). Centre for regional and tourism research, NexøGoogle Scholar
  32. Nilsson PÅ (2008) Tourism in cold water islands: a matter of contract? Experiences from destination development in the Polar North. Island Stud J 3(1):97–112Google Scholar
  33. Orams MB (2002) Feeding wildlife as a tourism attraction: a review of issues and impacts. Tour Manage 23:281–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Quiros AL (2007) Tourist compliance to a code of conduct and the resulting effects on whale shark (Rhincodon typus) behavior in Donsol, Philippines. Fish Res 84(1):102–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ritchie B, Crouch G (2003) The competitive destination: a sustainable tourism perspective. CABI, WallingfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rodger K, Moore S, Newsome D (2009) Wildlife tourism, science and actor network theory. Ann Tour Res 36(4):645–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Strong P, Morris SR (2010) Grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) disturbance, ecotourism and the Pembrokeshire Marine Code around Ramsey Island. J Ecotour 9(2):117–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Timur S, Getz D (2002) Applying stakeholder theory to the implementation of sustainable urban tourism. In: Wöber K (ed) City tourism. Springer, Amsterdam, pp 194–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vannini P, Baldacchino G, Guay L, Royle S, Steinberg P (2006) Recontinentalizing Canada: Arctic Ice’s liquid modernity and the imagining of a Canadian archipelago. Island Stud J 1(1):3–18Google Scholar
  40. Whoeler EJ, Peney RL, Creet SM, Burton HR (1994) Impacts of human visitors on breeding success and long-term population trends in Adélie Penguins at Casey, Antarctica. Polar Biol 14:269–274Google Scholar
  41. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future (Brundtland report) (A/42/427). United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Magdalena Granquist
    • 1
    • 3
  • Per Åke Nilsson
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Institute of Freshwater FisheriesHvammstangiIceland
  2. 2.Hólar University CollegeSauðárkrókurIceland
  3. 3.The Icelandic Seal CentreHvammstangiIceland
  4. 4.Hammerdal Förlag & ReportageHammerdalSweden

Personalised recommendations