Assessing Hurricane Intensity Using Satellites

Chapter

Abstract

Tropical cyclones spend most of their life cycle over the tropical and subtropical oceans. Because of the lack of in situ data in these regions, satellite observations are fundamental for tracking and estimating the intensity of these storms for real-time forecasting and monitoring climate trends. This chapter reviews methods for estimating tropical cyclone intensity from satellites, including those based on visible, infrared, and microwave instruments. Satellite intensity estimates are transitioning from subjective to objective methods, and new instruments on the next generation of NOAA low-earth orbiting and geostationary satellites hold promise for continued improvement in satellite analysis of tropical cyclones.

References

  1. Bankert RL, Tag PM (2002) An automated method to estimate tropical cyclone intensity using SSM/I imagery. J Appl Meteorol 41:461–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bessho K, DeMaria M, Knaff JA (2006) Tropical cyclone wind retrievals from the advanced microwave sounder unit (AMSU): Application to surface wind analysis. J Appl Meteorol 45:399–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brueske KF, Velden CS (2003) Satellite-based tropical cyclone intensity estimation using the NOAA–KLM series advanced microwave sounding unit (AMSU). Mon Weather Rev 131:687–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Demuth JL, DeMaria M, Knaff JA, Vonder Haar TH (2004) Validation of an advanced microwave sounding unit tropical cyclone intensity and size estimation algorithm. J Appl Meteorol 43:282–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Demuth JL, DeMaria M, Knaff JA (2006) Improvement of advanced microwave sounding unit tropical cyclone intensity and size estimation algorithms. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 45:1573–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dvorak VF (1975) Tropical cyclone intensity analysis and forecasting from satellite imagery. Mon Weather Rev 103:420–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dvorak VF (1984) Tropical cyclone intensity analysis using satellite data. NOAA Tech. Rep. NESDIS11, p 47 [Available from NOAA/NESDIS, 5200 Auth Rd., Washington, DC 20233.]Google Scholar
  8. Dworak R, Key JR (2009) Twenty years of polar winds from AVHRR: validation and comparison with ERA-40. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 48:24–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emanuel K (2007) Environmental factors affecting tropical cyclone power dissipation. J Climate 20:5497–5509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hawkins HF, Imbembo SM (1976) The structure of a small, intense Hurricane—Inez 1966. Mon Weather Rev 104:418–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Herndon DC, et al (2010) The CIMSS satellite consensus (SATCON) tropical cyclone intensity algorithm. 29th conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, Tuscon, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 4d.4. [Available online at http://ams.confex.con/ams/29Hurricanes/techprogram/paper_167959.htm.]
  12. Hubert LF, Timchalk A (1969) Estimating hurricane wind speeds from satellite pictures. Mon Weather Rev 97:382–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kidder SQ, Gray WM, Vonder Haar TH (1978) Tropical cyclone outer surface winds derived from satellite microwave sounder data. Mon Weather Rev 108:144–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kidder SQ et al (2000) Satellite analysis of tropical cyclones using the advanced microwave sounding unit (AMSU). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 83:1241–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Knaff JA, Brown DP, Courtney J, Gallina GM, Beven JL II (2010) An evaluation of Dvorak technique–based tropical cyclone intensity estimates. Weather Forecast 25:1362–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Knutson TR, McBride J, Chan J, Emanuel KA, Holland G, Landsea C, Held IM, Kossin J, Srivastava AK, Sugi M (2010) Tropical cyclones and climate change. Nat Geosci 3(3):157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kossin JP, Camargo SJ, Sitkowski M (2010) Climate modulation of North Atlantic hurricane tracks. Am Meteorol Soc J Clim 23:3057–3076Google Scholar
  18. Landsea CW, Vecchi GA, Bengtsson L, Knutson TR (2010) Impact of duration thresholds on Atlantic tropical cyclone counts. J Climate 23:2508–2519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. O’Neill LW, Chelton DB, Esbensen SK (2010) The effects of SST-induced surface wind speed and direction on gradients on mid-latitude surface vorticity and divergence. J Climate 23:255–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olander T, Velden CS (2007) The advanced Dvorak technique (ADT) – continued development of an objective scheme to estimate tropical cyclone intensity using geostationary infrared satellite imagery. Weather Forecast 22:287–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Olander T, Velden CS, Kossin J (2004) The advanced objective Dvorak technique (AODT): latest upgrades and future directions. In: Proceedings 26th AMS hurricane and tropical meteorology conference, Miami, FL, Amer Meteor Soc P1.19Google Scholar
  22. Spencer RW, Braswell WD (2001) Atlantic tropical cyclone monitoring with AMSU-a: estimation of maximum sustained wind speeds. Mon Weather Rev 129:1518–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stern DP, Nolan DS (2012) On the height of the warm core in tropical cyclones. J Atmos Sci 69:1657–1680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Velden CS, Bekda KM (2009) Identifying the uncertainty in determining satellite-derived atmospheric motion vector height attribution. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 48:450–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Velden CS, Olander TL, Zehr RM (1998) Development of an objective scheme to estimate tropical cyclone intensity from digital geostationary satellite infrared imagery. Weather Forecast 13:172–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Velden CS et al (2006) The Dvorak tropical cyclone intensity estimation technique: a satellite-based method that has endured for over 30 years. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 87:1195–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wimmers AJ, Velden CS (2010) Objectively determining the rotational center of tropical cyclones in passive microwave satellite imagery. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 49:2013–2034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zehr R (1989) Improving objective satellite estimates of tropical cyclone intensity. Preprints, 18th conf. on Hurricanes and Tropical Meteorology, San Diego, Amer. Meteor. Soc., J25–J28Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RAMMB BranchNOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and ResearchFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.Cooperative Institute for Research in the AtmosphereColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations