Advertisement

Simulation Videos for Understanding Occlusion Effects on Kernel Based Object Tracking

  • Beng Yong LeeEmail author
  • Lee Hung Liew
  • Wai Shiang Cheah
  • Yin Chai Wang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 203)

Abstract

Occlusion handling is one of the most studied problems for object tracking in computer vision. Many previous works claimed that occlusion can be handled effectively using Kalman filter, Particle filter and Mean Shift tracking methods. However, these methods were only tested on specific task videos. In order to explore the actual potential of these methods, this paper introduced 64 simulation video sequences to experiment the effectiveness of each tracking methods on various occlusion scenarios. Tracking performances are evaluated based on Sequence Frame Detection Accuracy (SFDA). The results showed that Mean shift tracker would fail completely when full occlusion occurred. Kalman filter tracker achieved highest SFDA score of 0.85 when tracking object with uniform trajectory and no occlusion. Results also demonstrated that Particle filter tracker fails to detect object with non-uniform trajectory. The effect of occlusion on each tracker is analyzed with Frame Detection Accuracy (FDA) graph.

Keywords

Computer vision Object tracking Occlusion handling 

References

  1. 1.
    Kasturi, R., Goldgof, D., Soundararajan, P., Manohar, V., Garofolo, J., Bowers, R., Boonstra, M., Korzhova, V., Zhang, J.: Framework for performance evaluation of face, text, and vehicle detection and tracking in video: data, metrics, and protocol. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 31(2), 319–336 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Di Caterina, G., Soraghan, J. J.: An improved mean shift tracker with fast failure recovery strategy after complete occlusion. In: IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal-Based Surveillance, pp. 130–135 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gao, J.: Self-occlusion immune video tracking of objects in cluttered environment. In: IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal-Based Surveillance, pp. 79–84 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    PETS2009: Benchmark data. http://www.cvg.rdg.ac.uk/PETS2009/a.html
  5. 5.
    ETISEO: Evaluation For Video Understanding. http://www-sop.inria.fr/orion/ETISEO/
  6. 6.
    Taylor, G.R., Chosak, A.J., Brewe, P.C.: OVVV: using virtual worlds to design and evaluate surveillance systems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1–8 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yilmaz, A., Javed, O., Shah, M.: Object tracking: a survey. In: ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 38, no. 4 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Comaniciu, D., Ramesh, V.: Kernel-based object tracking. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 25(5), 564–577 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Comaniciu, D., Ramesh, V., Meer P.: Real-time tracking of non-rigid objects using mean shift. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 142–149 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yilmaz, A.: Object tracking by asymmetric Kernel mean shift with automatic scale and orientation selection. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR ‘07, pp. 1–6 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mirabi, M., Javadi, S.: People tracking in outdoor environment using Kalman filter. In: Proceedings of Third International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation (ISMS), pp. 303–307 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang, H., Huo, L., Zhang, J.: Target tracking algorithm based on dynamic template and Kalman filter. In: Communication Software and Networks (ICCSN), 2011 IEEE 3rd, pp. 330–333 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cho, J.U., Jin, S.H., Pham, X.D., Jeon, J.W.: Object tracking circuit using particle filter with multiple features. In: SICE-ICASE, 2006. International Joint Conference, pp. 1431–1436 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liang, N., Guo, L., Wang Y.: An improved object tracking method based on particle filter. In: Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks (CECNet), 2012 2nd International Conference on, pp. 3107–3110 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li, Y., Huang, C., Nevatia, R.: Learning to associate: hybrid boosted multi-target tracker for crowded scene. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2953–2960 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Manohar, V., Soundararajan, P., Dmitry Goldgof, H.R., Kasturi, R., Garofolo, J.: Performance evaluation of object detection and tracking in video. In: Narayanan P.J. et al. (eds.) ACCV 2006. LNCS, vol. 3852, pp. 151–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kashanipour, A.: 2D Target Tracking Using Kalman Filter, MATLAB Central. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/14243-2d-target-tracking-using-kalman-filter
  18. 18.
    Paris, S.: Particle filter color tracker. In: MATLAB Central. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/17960-particle-filter-color-tracker
  19. 19.
    Bernhard, S.: Mean-Shift Video Tracking, MATLAB Central. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/355, March 2012

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beng Yong Lee
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lee Hung Liew
    • 1
  • Wai Shiang Cheah
    • 2
  • Yin Chai Wang
    • 2
  1. 1.Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM)SarawakMalaysia
  2. 2.Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS)SarawakMalaysia

Personalised recommendations