The Future of Powder Diffraction Is 2-D

Conference paper
Part of the NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics book series (NAPSB)

Abstract

The growing attractivenessv of two-dimensional detectors in powder diffraction does brings with it one severe drawback – the 2D to 1D data reduction. This can be a most time consuming and error prone operation, especially when the artifacts of the sample environment affect the intensities. Some developments in the field of calibrating, filtering and evaluation are presented. A selection of applications will be given throughout the oral presentation.

Keywords

Powder Diffraction Radial Line Diffraction Image Experimental Geometry Outlier Intensity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Hanfland M, Schwarz U, Syassen K, Takemura K (1999) Crystal structure of the high-pressure phase silicon VI. Phys Rev Lett 82:1197ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Knapp M, Baehtz C, Ehrenberg H, Fuess H (2004) The synchrotron powder diffractometer at beamline B2 at HASYLAB/DESY: status and capabilities. J Synchrotron Radiat 11:328–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Norby P (1997) Synchrotron powder diffraction using imaging plates: crystal structure determination and Rietveld refinement. J Appl Crystallogr 30:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meneghini C, Artioli G, Balerna A, Gualtieri AF, Norby P, Mobiliob S (2001) Multipurpose imaging-plate camera for in situ powder XRD at the GILDA beamline. J Synchrotron Radiat 8:1162–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wenk HR, Grigull S (2003) Synchrotron texture analysis with area detectors. J Appl Crystallogr 36:1040–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hammersley AP, Svensson SO, Hanfland M, Fitch AN, Häusermann D (1996) Two-dimensional detector systems: from real detector to idealised image of two-theta scan. High Press Res 14:235–248ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hinrichsen B, Dinnebier RE, Rajiv P, Hanfland M, Grzechnik A, Jansen M (2006) Advances in data reduction of high pressure X-ray powder diffraction data from two dimensional detectors: a case study of Schafarzikite (FeSb2O4). J Phys Cond Matter 18:S1021–1037ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rajiv P, Hinrichsen B, Dinnebier RE, Joswig M, Jansen M (2007) Automatic calibration of powder diffraction experiments using two-dimensional detectors. Powder Diffr 22(1):3–19ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cervellino A, Giannini C, Guagliardi A, Ladisab M (2006) Folding a two-dimensional powder diffraction image into a one dimensional scan: a new procedure. J Appl Crystallogr 39:745–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hinrichsen B, Dinnebier RE, Jansen M (2006) Powder 3D: An easy to use program for data reduction and graphical presentation of large numbers of powder diffraction patterns. Z Kristallogr 23:231–236Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max-Planck-Institute for Solid State ResearchStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations