Design of a Plan Irregular RC Frame Building by Direct Displacement-Based Design Method

  • Vittorio Capozzi
  • Gennaro Magliulo
  • Roberto Ramasco
Chapter
Part of the Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering book series (GGEE, volume 24)

Abstract

In this chapter, an application of the direct displacement-based design (DDBD) to multistorey irregular in-plan RC frame buildings is made. A case study is carried out in order to extend and validate the methodology to this type of structures. The design of a torsionally flexible system is carried out according to DDBD, and its seismic performance is compared, through nonlinear dynamic analyses, to the performance of the same building designed according to elastic modal response spectrum analysis. Lumped plasticity models are implemented for nonlinear dynamic analyses, which are carried out according to EC8 provisions: seven real earthquakes, selected in order to fit on average the elastic design spectrum, are used as input. The two different design methods provide very different reinforcement ratios: the DDBD allows a reinforcement saving of about 70% for beams and 50% for columns. In spite of this, the verification at the ultimate limit state, performed by nonlinear dynamic analyses according to EC8, is satisfied. Furthermore, nonlinear analyses show a better response of the structure designed by DDBD: the torsional twist is reduced and the damage is better distributed.

Keywords

Plastic Hinge Base Shear Reinforcement Ratio Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis Yielding Displacement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research has been partially funded by Italian Department of Civil Protection in the frame of the national project DPC-ReLUIS 2010–2013. The authors thank Eng. Angelo Farnetano for the precious collaboration in the execution of the numerical analyses.

References

  1. Belleri A, Riva P (2009) Influenza delle connessioni pilastro-fondazione e pilastro-trave di strutture prefabbricate nel DDBD. In: Atti del XIII convegno ANIDIS “L’ ingegneria sismica in Italia”, Bologna, Italy, June 28–July 2 (in Italian)Google Scholar
  2. Benedetti A, Landi L, Malavolta D (2008) On the design and evaluation of seismic response of RC buildings according to direct displacement-based design approach. In: Proceedings of 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, Beijing, China, 12–17 Oct 2008Google Scholar
  3. Beyer K, Dazio A, Priestley MJN (2008) Seismic design of torsionally eccentric buildings with RC U-shaped walls. IUSS Press, PaviaGoogle Scholar
  4. Castillo R (2004) Seismic design of asymmetric ductile systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  5. CEN (2002) Eurocode 0: basis of structural design, EN 1990, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  6. CEN (2002) Eurocode 1: actions on structures – Part 1-1: general actions – densities, self weight, imposed loads for buildings, EN 1991-1-1, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  7. CEN (2003) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, Final draft, prEN 1998-1, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  8. CEN (2004) Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures – Part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings, EN 1992-1-1, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  9. CEN (2005) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 3: assessment and retrofitting of buildings, UNI EN 1998-3, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  10. CSI Computer & Structures Inc (2004) SAP2000: linear and nonlinear static and dynamic analysis of three-dimensional structures. Computer & Structures Inc., BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  11. Garcia R, Sullivan TJ, Della Corte G (2010) Development of a displacement-based design method for steel frame-RC wall buildings. J Earthq Eng 14(2):252–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li KN (1996) Canny 99: a computer program for 3D nonlinear dynamic analysis of building structures – technical manual and users’ manual. Canny Consultants Pte Ltd., SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  13. Maddaloni G, Magliulo G, Manfredi G (2012) Effect of the seismic input on non-linear response of r/c building structures. Adv Struct Eng 15(10):1861–1877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maley TJ, Sullivan TJ, Della Corte G (2010) Development of a displacement-based design method for steel dual systems with buckling-restrained braces and moment-resisting frames. J Earthq Eng 14(S1):106–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Paulay T (2001) Some design principles relevant to torsional phenomena in ductile buildings. J Earthq Eng 5(3):273–308Google Scholar
  16. Pettinga JD, Priestley MJN, Pampanin S, Christopoulos C (2007) The role of inelastic torsion in the determination of residual deformations. J Earthq Eng 11(1):133–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri (2005) Ordinanza n. 3431 del 3 maggio 2005: Ulteriori modifiche ed integrazioni all’Ordinanza del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri n. 3274 del 20 marzo 2003, Italia (in Italian)Google Scholar
  18. Priestley MJN (1993) Myths and fallacies in earthquake engineering – conflicts between design and reality. Bull NZ Natl Soc Earthq Eng 26(3):329–341Google Scholar
  19. Priestley MJN (1998) Displacement-based approaches to rational limit states design of new structures. In: Proceedings of European conference of earthquake engineering, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  20. Priestley MJN, Calvi GM, Kowalsky MJ (2007) Displacement-based seismic design of structures. IUSS Press, PaviaGoogle Scholar
  21. Rizzato M, Tullini N, Laudiero F (2009) Analisi di pareti in c.a. mediante modelli a fibre: confronti tra l’approccio agli spostamenti ed alle forze. In: Atti del XIII Convegno ANIDIS “L’ ingegneria sismica in Italia”, Bologna, Italy, 28 June–2 July (in Italian)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vittorio Capozzi
    • 1
  • Gennaro Magliulo
    • 1
  • Roberto Ramasco
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Structural Engineering (DIST)University of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations