Many Stakeholders, Multiple Perspectives: Long-Term Planning for a Future Coast

  • Sophie A. Day (née Nicholson-Cole)
  • Tim O’Riordan
  • Jessica Bryson (née Milligan)
  • Peter Frew
  • Robert Young
Part of the Advances in Global Change Research book series (AGLO, volume 49)

Abstract

Current planning for the future of coastal zones in England is occurring at a time of great change and uncertainty. Alongside the expectation of increased storminess and impending sea-level rise associated with climate change, coastal decision-making is subject to a whole host of institutional shifts and the legacy of past coastal management decisions. Changing official policy, administrative arrangements and jurisdictions, the need to create conditions for community involvement and local and national level budgetary constraints are all issues in the melting pot.

This chapter summarises recent and current decision-making practice as it applies to Norfolk, UK, and suggests how coastal management for a changing coastline may generally become more adaptive, socially fair and effectively implemented. In Norfolk, coastal change is a complex and emotive issue, the management of which has evolved significantly over the last two decades. This chapter specifically addresses the ways in which national, regional and local stakeholder interests have interacted during this tumultuous time in North Norfolk to negotiate pathways for adapting to coastal change. The case example presented in this chapter, and more broadly in this book, illustrates that there are social limits and barriers, which hinder the conditions most likely to enable progressively more adaptive coastal governance.

Many lessons have been learned from this experience and these are outlined in the context of how coastal governance in England and further afield may seek to become more adaptive. Integrated approaches to the management of future coasts are needed, encompassing robust science, genuine stakeholder commitment and inclusion, and funding arrangements (as adaptation always comes at a cost). In this regard, the deployment of the Tyndall Coastal Simulator approach can help to support this need.

Within the Tyndall Coastal Simulator, this work provided an important context for all the model development. With the visualisations (Chap.  10) and interface (Chap.  11), it also provided a conduit from the models to a true two-way stakeholder interaction and feedback. This experience showed that regular stakeholder engagement activities should always be a core part of integrated assessment exercises.

Keywords

Adaptive coastal governance Coastal change Stakeholder engagement 

References

  1. Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, D. R., Naess, L. O., Wolf, J., & Wreford, A. (2009). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change, 93, 335–354. doi: 10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger, W. N., Barnett, J., Chapin, F. S., & Ellemor, H. (2011). This must be the place: Underrepresentation of identity and meaning in climate change decision-making. Global Environmental Politics, 11, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armitage, D. R., Plummer, R., Berkes, F., Arthur, R. I., Charles, A. T., Davidson-Hunt, I. J., Diduck, A. P., Doubleday, N. C., Johnson, D. S., Marschke, M., McConney, P., Pinkerton, E. W., & Wollenberg, E. K. (2009). Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dawson, R. J., Dickson, M., Nicholls, R. J., Hall, J., Walkden, M. J. A., Stansby, P. K., Mokrech, M., Richards, J., Zhou, J., Milligan, J., Jordan, A., Pearson, S., Rees, J., Bates, P. D., Koukoulas, S., & Watkinson, A. (2009). Integrated analysis of risks of coastal flooding and cliff erosion under scenarios of long term change. Climatic Change, 95, 249–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Defra. (2005). Making space for water: Taking forward a new government strategy for flood and coastal erosion risk management in England. First Government response to the autumn 2004. Making space for water consultation exercise. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.Google Scholar
  6. Defra. (2011a). ARCHIVE: Coastal change pathfinders. http://archive.defra.gov.uk/environment/flooding/manage/pathfinder/. Cited 19 Nov 2013.
  7. Defra. (2011b). Coastal pathfinder evaluation: An assessment of the five largest pathfinder projects: A final report by Regeneris Consulting. London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. http://www.defra.gov.uk/publications/files/pb13721-coastal-pathfinder-evaluation.pdf. Cited 19 Nov 2013.
  8. East Anglian Coastal Group. (2012). SMP 6 – Kelling hard to lowestoft ness. http://www.eacg.org.uk/smp6.asp . Cited 13 Nov 2013.
  9. Falaleeva, M., O’Mahony, C., Gray, S., Desmond, M., Gault, J., & Cummins, V. (2011). Towards climate adaptation and coastal governance in Ireland: Integrated architecture for effective management? Marine Policy, 35, 784–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freisinger, S., & Bernatchez, P. (2010). Perceptions of Gulf of St Lawrence coastal communities confronting environmental change: Hazards and adaptation, Québec, Canada. Ocean & Coastal Management, 53, 669–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. French, P. W. (2004). The changing nature of, and approaches to, UK coastal management at the start of the twenty-first century. Geographical Journal, 170, 116–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frew, P. (2012). Adapting to coastal change in north Norfolk, UK. Proceedings of the ICE – Maritime Engineering, 165(3), 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gopnik, M., Fieseler, C., Cantral, L., McClellan, K., Pendleton, L., & Crowder, L. (2012). Coming to the table: Early stakeholder engagement in marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 36, 1139–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. House of Commons Communities and Local Government Committee. (2007). Coastal towns (Second Report of Session 2006–7). London: The Stationary Office Limited. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmselect/cmcomloc/351/351.pdf. Cited 13 Nov 2013.
  15. Huitema, D., Mostert, E., Egas, W., Moellenkamp, W., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Yalcin, R. (2009). Adaptive water governance: Assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive co-management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecology and Society, 14(1), 26.Google Scholar
  16. Leafe, R., Pethick, J., & Townend, I. (1998). Realizing the benefits of shoreline management. Geographical Journal, 164, 282–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S. A., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17, 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Milligan, J., O’Riordan, T., Nicholson-Cole, S. A., & Watkinson, A. R. (2009). Nature conservation for sustainable shorelines: Lessons from seeking to involve the public. Land Use Policy, 26(2), 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nicholls, R. J., & Lowe, J. A. (2004). Benefits of mitigation of climate change for coastal areas. Global Environmental Change, 14(3), 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nicholson-Cole, S. A., & O’Riordan, T. (2009). Adaptive governance for a changing coastline: Science, policy and publics in search of a sustainable future. In W. N. Adger, I. Lorenzoni, & K. L. O’Brien (Eds.), Adapting to climate change: Thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Olsen, S. B., Page, G. G., & Ochoa, E. (2009). The analysis of governance responses to ecosystem change: A handbook for assembling a baseline (LOICZ Reports and Studies No. 34, 87pp.). Geesthacht: LOICZ International Project Office.Google Scholar
  22. O’Riordan, T., & Nicholson-Cole, S. (2010). Turning the tide in north Norfolk: A case study of adaptation to coastal change. In I. Scott & R. Worsley (Eds.), The return of the tide…on the saltmarsh coast of north Norfolk. Norfolk: JJG Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Schmidt, L., Prista, P., Saraiva, T., O’Riordan, T., & Gomes, C. (2012). Adapting governance for coastal change in Portugal. Land Use Policy, 31, 314–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stojanovic, T. A., & Ballinger, R. C. (2009). Integrated coastal management: A comparative analysis of four UK initiatives. Applied Geography, 29, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tompkins, E. L., Adger, W. N., Boyd, E., Nicholson-Cole, S., Weatherhead, K., & Arnell, N. (2010). Observed adaptation to climate change: UK evidence of transition to a well-adapting society. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 627–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tonn, B., Hemrick, A., & Conrad, F. (2006). Cognitive representations of the future: Survey results. Futures, 38, 810–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tunstall, S. M., & Penning-Rowsell, E. C. (1998). The English beach: Experiences and values. Geographical Journal, 164, 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Young, R. (2009). Coastal planning – Plus ça change! Town and Country Planning, 78(10), 418–422.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sophie A. Day (née Nicholson-Cole)
    • 1
  • Tim O’Riordan
    • 2
  • Jessica Bryson (née Milligan)
    • 3
  • Peter Frew
    • 4
  • Robert Young
    • 5
  1. 1.Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Faculty of Engineering and the EnvironmentUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
  2. 2.School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
  3. 3.Geography and the Lived Environment Research Institute, School of GeosciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  4. 4.Coastal Strategy for North Norfolk District CouncilCoastal Management ConsultantElyUK
  5. 5.Coast and Community PartnershipsNorth Norfolk District CouncilNorfolkUK

Personalised recommendations