Peirce on God, Reality and Personality

Chapter

Abstract

The first generation of Peirce scholars generally considered his cosmological writings something of an irrelevant embarrassment. Recent commentators have realized that Peirce the tough-minded logician and philosopher of science must somehow be reconciled with Peirce the tender-minded defender of a metaphysics of evolutionary love. This paper will explain how one of the earliest proponents of a broadly verificationist approach to meaning could also defend a conception of the universe as growing toward concrete reasonableness through being loved. Verificationism and cosmology come intriguingly together in Peirce’s denial that unknowable realities can exist and his concomitant insistence that reality is thought-like. Special attention will be paid to this anti-nominalist theory of reality and to one of its consequences, viz. that a person is of the nature of a sign. Peirce’s argument that God is real and personal thus deploys distinctive, valuable and challenging conceptions of reality and personality.

Keywords

Real Thing Ultimate Reality Final Opinion Individual Thing True Opinion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Boler, John. 2004. Peirce and medieval thought. In The Cambridge companion to Peirce, ed. Cheryl Misak, 58–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fisch, Max. 1986. Peirce’s progress from nominalism toward realism. In Peirce, semeiotic, and pragmatism: Essays by Max H. Fisch, ed. K.L. Ketner and C.J.W. Kloesel, 184–200. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Goudge, T.A. 1950. The thought of C.S. Peirce. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hartshorne, Charles. 1941. A critique of Peirce’s idea of God. Philosophical Review 50: 516–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hartshorne, Charles. 1995. Peirce and religion: Between two forms of religious belief. In Peirce and contemporary thought, ed. K.L. Ketner, 339–355. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Orange, Donna. 1984. Peirce’s conception of God: A developmental study. Lubbock: Institute for Studies in Pragmaticism.Google Scholar
  7. Peirce, Charles. 1935, 1938. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Peirce, Charles. 1992, 1998. The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Raposa, Michael. 1989. Peirce’s philosophy of religion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations