Pediatric Electronic Health Records and Research

Chapter
Part of the Translational Bioinformatics book series (TRBIO, volume 2)

Abstract

Pediatric providers use electronic health record systems to review patient information, to document care, to order clinical interventions, and to perform related administrative tasks. All of these activities create data that might be useful in research, although research is seldom the objective of EHR-related data entry. Providers may use other information systems (e.g., specialized systems for analyzing electrocardiograms), but the EHR is the central application for clinical and administrative clinical activities. While there are a few EHR systems designed specifically for care of pediatric patients, most pediatric providers adopt general-purpose EHRs that must be customized for specialized pediatric environments. In this chapter we outline the special functional requirements of EHRs (e.g., growth monitoring, medication dosing, and immunization management), the relative difficulty of meeting these requirements with EHRs that are currently available in the marketplace, and current adoption trends. We discuss workflows that present special challenges to EHR implementation. We discuss the typical workflow phenomena that affect the use of data for research and other secondary uses. We also discuss special aspects of terminology systems employed by EHRs that have implications for pediatric usability. Lastly, we address special issues in the use of EHR data for the extraction of care quality measures.

Keywords

Newborn Screening Growth Chart Noonan Syndrome Medicaid Program Adult Care 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine and Bright Futures Steering Committee. Recommendations for preventive pediatric health care. Pediatrics. 2007;120(6):1376.Google Scholar
  2. Blavin F, Ormond B. HITECH, meaningful use, and public health: funding opportunities for state immunization registries, C.f.M.a.M. Services, editor, Washington, DC; 2011.Google Scholar
  3. CCHIT. CCHIT Child Health Workgroup. 2010 [cited 2012 Apr 1]. Available from: http://www.cchit.org/workgroups/child-health
  4. CDC. Percentile data files with LMS values. 2012 [cited 2012 Mar 14]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/percentile_data_files.htm
  5. CMS. Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Records (EHR) Incentive Programs. 2012 [cited 2012 Apr 1]. Available from: https://http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/EHRIncentivePrograms/index.html?redirect=/EHRIncentivePrograms/
  6. Conroy S, Sweis D, et al. Interventions to reduce dosing errors in children: a systematic review of the literature. Drug Saf. 2007;30(12):1111–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooley WC, Sagerman PJ. Supporting the health care transition from adolescence to adulthood in the medical home. Pediatrics. 2011;128(1):182–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cortese MM, et al. Leveraging state immunization information systems to measure the effectiveness of rotavirus vaccine. Pediatrics. 2011;128(6):e1474–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dart RC, Rumack BH. Intravenous acetaminophen in the United States: iatrogenic dosing errors. Pediatrics. 2012;129(2):349–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DesRoches CM, et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care – a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):50–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fairbrother G, Simpson LA. Measuring and reporting quality of health care for children: CHIPRA and beyond. Acad Pediatr. 2011;11(3 Suppl):S77–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fenton TR. A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda’s chart updated with recent data and a new format. BMC Pediatr. 2003;3:13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finnegan B, et al. Policy Research Brief No. 9: boosting health information technology in medicaid: the potential effect of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, in Geiger Gibson/RCHN Comunity Health Foundation Research Collaborative, George Washington University; 2009.Google Scholar
  14. Friedlin J, Dexter PR, Overhage JM. Details of a successful clinical decision support system. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007;2007:254–8.Google Scholar
  15. Gardner RM, Pryor TA, Warner HR. The HELP hospital information system: update 1998. Int J Med Inform. 1999;54(3):169–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grummer-Strawn LM, et al. Use of World Health Organization and CDC growth charts for children aged 0–59 months in the United States. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR-9):1–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Haggerty RJ. Health supervision visits: should the immunization schedule drive the system? Pediatrics. 1987;79(4):581–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. HHS. Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, Title XIII of Division A and Title IV of Division B of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA), in Pub. L. No. 111-5 (Feb. 17, 2009), U.S.D.o.H.a.H. Services, Editor, Washington, DC; 2009.Google Scholar
  19. Jha AK, et al. A progress report on electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(10):1951–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kallem C. Transforming clinical quality measures for EHR use. NQF refines emeasures for use in EHRs and meaningful use program. J AHIMA. 2011;82(11):52–3.Google Scholar
  21. Kemper AR, Uren RL, Clark SJ. Adoption of electronic health records in primary care pediatric practices. Pediatrics. 2006;118(1):e20–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kressly S. Testimony from the Hearing on Health IT Adoption and the New Challenges Faced by Solo and Small Group Health Care Practices, June 24, 2009. Small Business Committee Document Number 111–032. Available via the GPO Website: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/house. Accessed 1 June 2012.
  23. Laron Z, Lilos P, Klinger B. Growth curves for Laron syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 1993;68(6):768–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leu MG, O’Connor K, Marshall R, Price D, Klein D. Pediatricians’ use of health information technology: a national survey. Pediatrics. 2012; in press.Google Scholar
  25. Mandl KD, Kohane IS. Escaping the EHR trap – the future of health IT. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2240–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin ND, et al. New height, weight and head circumference charts for British children with Williams syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92(7):598–601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McColm D, Karcz A. Comparing manual and automated coding of physicians quality reporting initiative measures in an ambulatory EHR. J Med Pract Manage. 2010;26(1):6–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Menachemi N, et al. Charting the use of electronic health records and other information technologies among child health providers. BMC Pediatr. 2006;6:21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller RA, et al. The anatomy of decision support during inpatient care provider order entry (CPOE): empirical observations from a decade of CPOE experience at Vanderbilt. J Biomed Inform. 2005;38(6):469–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nakamura MM, et al. Electronic health record adoption by children’s hospitals in the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(12):1145–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nellhaus G. Head circumference from birth to eighteen years. Practical composite international and interracial graphs. Pediatrics. 1968;41(1):106–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ranke MB, et al. Noonan syndrome: growth and clinical manifestations in 144 cases. Eur J Pediatr. 1988;148(3):220–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rollins JD, Collins JS, Holden KR. United States head circumference growth reference charts: birth to 21 years. J Pediatr. 2010;156(6):907–13, 913.e1-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosenbloom ST, et al. Implementing pediatric growth charts into an electronic health record system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006;13(3):302–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Selden TM. Compliance with well-child visit recommendations: evidence from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2000-2002. Pediatrics. 2006;118(6):e1766–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shiffman R, et al. Information technology for children’s health and health care: report on the information technology in children’s health care expert meeting, September 21–22. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;8(6):546–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spooner SA. Special requirements of electronic health record systems in pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2007;119(3):631–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spooner SA, Classen DC. Data standards and improvement of quality and safety in child health care. Pediatrics. 2009;123 Suppl 2:S74–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Strom BL, et al. Unintended effects of a computerized physician order entry nearly hard-stop alert to prevent a drug interaction: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(17):1578–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taketomo CK, Hodding JH, Kraus DM. Lexi-Comp’s pediatric & neonatal dosage handbook: a comprehensive resource for all clinicians treating pediatric and neonatal patients (Pediatric dosage handbook). 18th ed. Hudson: Lexi-Comp; 2011.Google Scholar
  41. Yasuda K, C.o.P.a.A. Medicine. Immunization information systems. Pediatrics. 2006;118(3):1293–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PediatricsUniversity of Cincinnati College of MedicineCincinnatiUSA
  2. 2.Division of Biomedical InformaticsCincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical CenterCincinnatiUSA
  3. 3.Divisions of Hospital Medicine and Biomedical InformaticsCincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical CenterCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations