Rationale for Biological and Other Features

Chapter

Abstract

The rationale is the process of identifying, in outline, the most appropriate management for the various site features. The procedure comprises two distinct phases, beginning with the identification of the status of the feature and an assessment of current conservation management. We will have some confidence in current management when the feature is considered to be at Favourable Conservation Status and little confidence when it is not. The second stage considers the relationship between factors and the condition of the feature, and the implications of the factors to management.

Keywords

Favourable Condition Dead Wood Previous Assessment Heavy Grazing Maintenance Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alexander, M. (1996). A Guide to the Production of Management Plans for Nature Conservation and Protected Areas. Countryside Council for Wales, Bangor, Wales.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, M. (2005). The CMS Guide to Management Planning. The CMS Consortium, Talgarth, Wales.Google Scholar
  3. Eurosite (1999). Toolkit for Management Planning. Eurosite, Tilburg, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  4. JNCC (1998). A Statement on Common Standards Monitoring. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, UK.Google Scholar
  5. Margoluis, R. and Salafsky, N. (1998). Measures of Success: Designing, Managing, and Monitoring Conservation and Development Projects. Island Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  6. NCC (1983). A Handbook for the Preparation of Management Plans. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, UK.Google Scholar
  7. NCC (1988). Site Management Plans for Nature Conservation, A Working Guide. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough. UK.Google Scholar
  8. Pullin, A. S. and Knight, T. M. (2001). Effectiveness in conservation practice: pointers from medicine and public health. Conservation Biology, 15, 50–54.Google Scholar
  9. Rowell, T. A. (1993). Common Standards for Monitoring SSSIs. JNCC Peterborough. UK.Google Scholar
  10. Sutherland, W. J. (2000). The Conservation Handbook: Research, Management and Policy. Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sutherland, W. J., Pullin, A. S., Dolman, P. M. and Knight, T. M. (2004). The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 305–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CMSCTalgarth, Brecon PowysUK

Personalised recommendations