Advertisement

Bricolage Practices in Local Forestry

  • Jessica de KoningEmail author
  • Charlotte Benneker
Chapter
Part of the World Forests book series (WFSE, volume 14)

Abstract

Academics and policy makers often analyse the role of institutions in terms of an institutional logic that assumes that designed institutions can effectively shape the (rational) behaviour of actors. In turn, this institutional approach assumes that local actors will automatically embrace new institutions and adapt their behaviour accordingly. However, research at the grassroots level reveals a different story. In this chapter, we show how the introduction of regulations and norms on local forestry triggers a chain of different, often unexpected, responses from local actors. The chapter addresses the processes by which local actors respond to externally imposed institutional arrangements in terms of a logic of practice. It uses the concept of bricolage to analyse forest use practices on the ground that result from the reshaping and combining of different institutional elements. The chapter draws on examples from the global South to show that local actors creatively construct a patchwork of institutions in which old institutions are recombined with the new and in which it becomes clear that institutions in fact do not directly influence behaviour but rather emerge in practices of bricolage directly or indirectly, consciously or unconsciously. It concludes by stating that introduced institutions do not easily steer human behaviour. A much more important determinant of behaviour is the local logic of practice of local actors. The impact of introduced institutions on local forestry therefore greatly depends on how much they relate to an existing logic of practice.

Keywords

Institutional bricolage Practices Forest management Institutions Local actors Papua New Guinea  Bolivia  Democratic Republic of Congo  

References

  1. Arnold JEM (2001) Forests and people: 25 years of community forestry. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  2. Benneker C (2008) Dealing with the state, the market and NGOs: the impact of institutions on the constitution and performance of community forest enterprises (CFE) in the lowlands of Bolivia. Doctoral thesis, Wageningen University, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  3. Benneker C, Assumani DM, Maindo A, Kimbwani G, Bola Mbele F, Lescuyer G, Esuka JC, Kasongo E, Begaa S (2012) Le bois à l’ordre du jour. Exploitation de bois d’œuvre en RDC secteur porteur d’espoir pour le développement des petites et moyennes entreprises. Tropenbos, KisanganiGoogle Scholar
  4. Bevir M (2005) New labour: a critique. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourdieu P (1977) Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Cleaver F (2001) Institutional bricolage, conflict and cooperation in Usangu, Tanzania. IDS Bull 32(4):26–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cleaver F (2002) Reinventing institutions: bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management. Eur J Dev Res 14(2):11–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cleaver F (2011) Development through bricolage: institutions and natural resource management. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. de Koning J (2011) Reshaping institutions—bricolage processes in smallholder forestry in the Amazon. Doctoral thesis, Wageningen University, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  10. de Koning J, Cleaver F (2012) Critical institutional thinking in community forestry—setting out an agenda for future research. In: Arts B, van Bommel S, van Ros-Tonen M, Verschoor G (eds) Forest people interfaces. Wageningen Academic Publishers, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  11. Galvan D (1997) The market meets scared fire: land pawning as institutional syncretism in inter-war Senegal. Afr Econ Hist (25):9–41Google Scholar
  12. Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Hall PA, Taylor RCR (1996) Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Polit Stud 44(5):936–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hughes R, Flintan F (2001) Integrating conservation and development experience: a review and bibliography of the ICDP literature. International Institute for Environment and Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaimowitz D (2008) The prospects for reduced emissions from deforestation and degradation (REDD) in Mesoamerica. Int For Rev 10(3):485–495Google Scholar
  16. Kalwij JJ, de Koning J (2000) Conservation in competition. Master thesis, Wageningen University, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  17. Karky BS, Skutsch M (2010) The cost of carbon abatement through community forest management in Nepal Himalaya. Ecol Econ 93(3):666–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lanzara GF (1999) Why it is so hard to build institutions. Desarrollo Economico-Revista De Cienc Sociales 38(152):925–952Google Scholar
  19. Leach M, Mearns R, Scoones I (1999) Environmental entitlements: dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management. World Dev 27(2):225–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Long N (2001) Development sociology: actor perspectives. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Long N, Long A (eds) (1992) Battlefields of knowledge: the interlocking of theory and practice in social research and development. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Lowndes V (2002) Institutionalism. In: Marsh D, Stoker G (eds) Theory and methods in political science. Palgrave, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Lund C (2006) Twilight institutions: public authority and local politics in Africa. Dev Change 37(4):685–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mehta L, Leach M, Scoones I (2001) Editorial: environmental governance in an uncertain world. IDS Bull 32(4):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nuijten M (1992) Local organization as organising practices—rethinking rural institutions. In: Long N, Long A (eds) Battlefields of knowledge: the interlocking of theory and practice in social research and development. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ostrom E (1991) Managing our common resources—introduction. Nat Resour 27(4):2–3Google Scholar
  29. Paavola J (2007) Institutions and environmental governance: a reconceptualization. Ecol Econ 63(1):93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rametsteiner E, Simula M (2003) Forest certification–an instrument to promote sustainable forest management? J Environ Manage 67(1):87–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ribot JC, Lund JF, Treue T (2010) Democratic decentralization in sub-saharan Africa: its contribution to forest management, livelihoods, and enfranchisement. Environ Conserv 37(1):35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ritchie J, Lewis J (2003) Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  33. Ros-Tonen MAF, van Andel T, Morsello C, Otsuki K, Rosendo S, Scholz I (2008) Forest-related partnerships in Brazilian Amazonia: there is more to sustainable forest management than reduced impact logging. For Ecol Manage 256(7):1482–1497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sandberg J, Tsoukas H (2011) Grasping the logic of practice: theorizing through practical rationality. Acad Manag Rev 36(2):338–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sehring J (2009) Path dependencies and institutional bricolage in post-soviet water governance. Water Altern 2(1):61–81Google Scholar
  36. Shepsle KA, Bonchek MS (1997) Analyzing politics: rationality, behavior, and institutions. W.W. Norton & Company Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Thornton P, Ocasio W (2008) Institutional logics. In: Greewood R, Oliver C, Suddaby R, Salin-Anderson K (eds) (2000) Handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  38. Witness G (2007) Rapport final de missions de contrôle dans le cadre de l’étude d’un Observateur Indépendant en appui au contrôle forestier en RDC, 19 juillet—11 octobre 2007. Global Witness, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Worah S (2000) International History of ICDPs. In: UNDP (2000) Proceedings of integrated conservation and development projects lessons learned workshop, 12–13 June 2000, UNDP/World Bank/WWF, HanoiGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forest and Nature Conservation Policy GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Tropenbos InternationalWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations