A Multiscale Approach to the Influence of Geometry and Deformation on the Electronic Properties of Carbon Nanotubes

Conference paper
Part of the IUTAM Bookseries (closed) book series (IUTAMBOOK, volume 31)

Abstract

In this paper, a general multiscale computational framework that concurrently couples the quantum-mechanical model with the finite element and/or meshfree method is developed for carbon nanotubes. The rehybridization and curvature effects, which are important for carbon nanotubes with both rotational and helical symmetries, is incorporated in the developed virtual atom cluster model as an extension to Bloch’s theorem. This approach is then used to study the electronic properties of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) influenced by geometry and deformation. Based on extensive studies, we conclude that the electron-mechanical coupling relations obtained in this work are more robust than the previous analytical studies in that it takes into account the important effects of curvature and relaxation. The simulation results highlight the importance of the concurrent coupling among the electronic properties, CNT geometry and mechanical deformation.

Keywords

Multiscale analysis Carbon nanotubes Electron-mechanical coupling Tight-binding method 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the general support from National Science Foundation (Grants CMMI 0600583 and 0700107). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in these documents are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

References

  1. 1.
    Tombler, T.W., et al.: Reversible electromechanical characteristics of carbon nanotubes under local-probe manipulation. Nature (Lond.) 405, 769–772 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cao, J., Wang, Q., Dai, H.J.: Electromechanical properties of metallic, quasimetallic, and semiconducting carbon nanotubes under stretching. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(15), 157601 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Minot, E.D., et al.: Tuning carbon nanotube band gaps with strain. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(15), 156401 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mintmire, J.W., White, C.T.: Universal density of states for carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81(12), 2506–2509 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    White, C.T., Mintmire, J.W.: Density of states reflects diameter in nanotubes. Nature 394(6688), 29–30 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yang, L., Han, J.: Electronic structure of deformed carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85(1), 154–157 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qian, D., Gondhalekar, R.H.: A virtual atom cluster approach to the mechanics of nanostructures. Int. J. Multiscale Comput. Eng. 2(2), 277–289 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qian, D., Wagner, G.J., Liu, W.K.: A multiscale projection method for the analysis of carbon nanotubes. Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 193(17–20), 1603–1632 (2004)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kittel, C.: Introduction to solid state physics. Wiley, New York/London/Sydney (1966)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Belytschko, T., Liu, W.K., Moran, B.: Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures. Wiley, New York (2000)MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Qian, D., Liu, W.K., Zheng, Q.J.: Concurrent quantum/continuum coupling analysis of nanostructures. Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 197(41–42), 3291–3323 (2008)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, W.K., et al.: Multiscale methods for mechanical science of complex materials: bridging from quantum to stochastic multiresolution continuum. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 83(8–9), 1039–1080 (2010)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering Program, School of Dynamic SystemsUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations