Zoo Talk pp 115-136 | Cite as

School and Family Groups’ Conversations

  • Patricia G. Patrick
  • Sue Dale Tunnicliffe
Chapter

Abstract

Chapter 8 provides a look at the conversations that take place between parents/children, adults/children, chaperones/children, teachers/children, and children/children. The content of conversations may reveal the rationale for the zoo visit, what the visitors talk about, and more. Conversations are used for a variety of functions and particular functions have characteristic forms. School and family conversations consist of instruction, hijacking the attention of a member by another group member, and talk of a subject irrespective of the topic being addressed. Occasionally, philosophical debates between children will occur without the intervention of an adult. Adults facilitate observational opportunities for children in the group but leave the children to construct their own dialogue. Parents may relate the child’s observations to prior knowledge or a context the parent understands. The dialogue at animal exhibits may contain both elements of leisure and education, which forms a distinct animal exhibit style of dialogue. Recognizing the zoological language or everyday language that comprises the conversations of primary school-aged children with families or school groups is of significance. Zoo educators and classroom educators need a formal understanding of the extent to which teaching and learning dialogues are used in animal exhibits. The educators need to know if the animal engenders the same comments without the presence of an adult. Moreover, educators must be aware of how words are understood, acquired, and used in conversation and whether the experience of viewing the exhibits aids the visitor in acquiring biological knowledge.

Keywords

Family Group Field Trip Verbal Interaction School Group School Visit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ash, D. (2003). Dialogic inquiry in life science conversations of family groups in a museum. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 138–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments people, places, and pursuits. Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments. National Research Council of the National Academies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2010). Learning science in informal environments people, places, and pursuits. Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments. National Research Council of the National Academies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. www.nap.edu.
  4. Birney, B. (1988). Criteria for successful museum and zoo visits: Children offer guidance. Curator: The Museum Journal, 31(4), 292–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borun, M., Chambers, M., & Cleghorn, A. (1996). Families are learning in science museums. Curator, 39(2), 123–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boulter, C. J., Selles, S. E., Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Reiss, M. J. (2011, April). Pupils’ responses to cues from the natural world: A cross-cultural study using multiple analytic perspectives. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  7. Bowers, C. A. (1997). The culture of denial: Why the environmental movement needs a strategy for reforming universities and public schools. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  8. Britton, J. (1970). Language and learning. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of learning environments: On procedures, principles and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289–325). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, A. L., Campione, J., Metz, K., & Ash, D. (1998). The development of science learning abilities in children. In A. Burgen & K. Harnquist (Eds.), Growing up with science: Developing early understanding of science (pp. 156–178). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  11. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Hermanson, K. (1995). Intrinsic motivation in museums: Why does one want to learn? In J. H. Falk & L. D. Dierking (Eds.), Public institutions for personal learning (pp. 67–77). Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.Google Scholar
  12. DeWitt, J., & Hohenstein, J. (2010). School trips and classroom lessons: An investigation into teacher-student talk in two settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 454–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Diamond, J. (1986). The behavior of family groups in science museums. Curator, 29(2), 139–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dierking, L. D. (1987). Parent–child interactions in a free choice learning setting: An examination of attention directing behaviour. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.Google Scholar
  15. Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children's ideas. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  16. Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Edwards, D., & Westgate, D. P. G. (1994). Investigating classroom talk. New York: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  18. Ellenbogen, K., Luke, J., & Dierking, L. (2004). Family learning research in museums: An emerging disciplinary matrix? Science Education, 88(Supplement 1), S48–S58.Google Scholar
  19. Falk, J. H. (2009). Identity and the museum visitor experience. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  20. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2010). Questioning the school-first paradigm: School is not where most Americans learn most of their science. Informal Learning Review, 105, 2–5.Google Scholar
  21. Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretative anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. Gleason, M., & Schauble, L. (2000). Parents’ assistance of scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 343–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Green, J., & Dixon, C. (1993). Introduction to “Talking knowledge into being: Discursive and social practices in classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 5(3&4), 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Green, J., & Meyer, L. (1991). The embeddedness of reading in classroom life. In C. Baker & A. Luke (Eds.), Towards a critical sociology of reading pedagogy (pp. 141–160). Philadelphia: John Benjamin.Google Scholar
  25. Griffin, J. (2004). Research on students and museums: Looking more closely at the students in school groups. Science Education, 88(Suppl.1), S59–S70.Google Scholar
  26. Gumperz, J. (1986). Interactive sociolinguistics in the study of schooling. In J. Cook Gumperz (Ed.), The social construction of literacy (pp. 45–68). London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hensel, K. (1987). Families in Museums: Interactions and conversations at displays. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University Teachers College, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Hilke, D. D. (1989). The family as a learning system: An observational study of families in museums. In B. H. Butler & M. B. Sussman (Eds.), Museum visits and activities for family life enrichment (pp. 101–129). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hughes, M., & Cousins, J. (1988). The roots of oracy: Early language at home and at school. In M. Maclure, T. Phillips, & A. Wilkinson (Eds.), Oracy matters (pp. 110–121). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  31. Louv, R. (2006). Last child in the woods. Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.Google Scholar
  32. Lucas, A. M., McManus, P., & Thomas, G. (1986). Investigating learning from informal sources: Listening to conversations and observing play in science museums. European Journal of Science Education, 8, 341–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marshdoyle, E., Bowman, M. L., & Mullins, G. W. (1981). Evaluating programmatic use of a community resource: The zoo. Journal of Environmental Education, 13(4), 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McManus, P. M. (1987). Communications with and between visitors to a science museum. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Chelsea College, University of London, London.Google Scholar
  35. Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning & Instruction, 6(4), 359–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ogborn, J., Kress, G., Martins, I., & McGillicuddy, K. (1996). Explaining Science in the Classroom. Milton Keynes, Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Parsons, C., & Muhs, K. (1994). Field trips and parent chaperones: A study of self-guided school groups at the Monterey Bay Aquarium. Visitor Studies: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 57–61.Google Scholar
  38. Patrick, P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2011). What plants and animals do early childhood and primary students’ name? Where do they see them? Journal of Science Education and Technology. Invited article and Special Issue: Early Childhood and Nursery School Education. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/content/e27121057mqr8542/, 1–25, iFirst article.
  39. Rennie, L. J. (1994). Measuring affective outcomes from a visit to a science education centre. Research in Science Education, 24, 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rix, C., & McSorley, J. (1999). An investigation into the role that school-based interactive science centres may play in the education of primary-aged children. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 577–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roschelle, J. (1996). Designing for cognitive communication: Epistemic fidelity or mediating collaborative inquiry. In D.L. Day & D.K. Kovaco (Eds.), Computers, Communication and Mental Models (pp. 13–25), London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  42. Rosenfeld, S. (1980). Informal learning in zoos: Naturalistic studies on family groups. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  43. ten Brink, B.L. (1984). Fifth grade students attitudes toward ecological and human issues involving animals. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Austin, University of Texas at Austin, TX.Google Scholar
  44. Tizard, B., & Hughes, M. (1984). Young children learning. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  45. Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1994). Why do teachers visit zoos with their pupils? International zoo news, 41(5), 4–13.Google Scholar
  46. Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1995). The content of conversations about the body parts and behaviours of animals during elementary school visits to a zoo and implications for teachers organising field trips. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 7(1), 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tunnicliffe, S. D. (1996). The relationship between pupil’s ages and the content of conversations generated at three types of animal exhibits. Research in Science Education, 26(4), 461–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tunnicliffe, S.D. (1998). Boy talk: Girl talk–Is it the same at animal exhibits? International Journal of Science Education, 20(7), 795–811.Google Scholar
  49. Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2010, March). First Engagement with the environment. Children are in touch with nature. People and Science, p. 25.Google Scholar
  50. Tunnicliffe, S. D., Lucas, A. M., & Osborne, J. F. (1997). School visits to zoos and museums: A missed educational opportunity? International Journal of Science Education, 19(9), 1039–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Reiss, M. J. (2000). Building a model of the environment: How do children see plants? Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 172–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wellington, J. (1990). Formal and informal learning in science: The role of the interactive science centres. Physics Education, 25, 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Wolins, I. S., Jensen, N., & Ulzheimer, R. (1992). Children’s memories of museum field trips: A qualitative study. Journal of Museum Education, 17(2), 17–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patricia G. Patrick
    • 1
  • Sue Dale Tunnicliffe
    • 2
  1. 1.Texas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA
  2. 2.Institute of EducationUniversity of LondonLondonEngland UK

Personalised recommendations