Hume and Bayle on Localization and Perception: A New Source for Hume’s Treatise 1.4.5

Chapter
Part of the International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées book series (ARCH, volume 210)

Abstract

Next to the five major areas listed by Norman Kemp Smith in which Bayle had exercised greater influence on Hume’s work, we shall add here a new Baylean source. It is not only the second part of section V (“Of the immateriality of the soul”) of Treatise I, IV that depends on Bayle (for the article Spinoza), but also the first part. The topic at issue is the difficulty of finding a “relation” between “perceptions, which are simple, and exist no where”, on the one hand, and on the other hand some “conjunction in place with matter or body, which is extended and divisible”. A primary source (not listed in Norton & Norton commentary) for this topic is an extensive chapter in Bayle’s Réponse aux questions d’un provincial (III, xv), where the problem of a possible (and impossible) ‘local conjunction’ of the spirit and the body is dealt with in considerable depth.

Keywords

Local Union Local Conjunction Human Soul Cartesian Dualism Constant Conjunction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Anderson, Robert F. 1980. In defense of Section V, a reply to Professor Yolton. Hume Studies 6: 26–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bayle, Pierre. 1727–1731. Œuvres diverses de Mr. Pierre Bayle, 4 vols. LaHaye: Husson.Google Scholar
  3. Bricke, John. 1980. Hume’s philosophy of mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Frasca-Spada, Marina. 1998. Space and the self in Hume’s treatise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gori, Giambattista. 2000. Da Malebranche a Hume: modelli della mente umana, immaginazioni, giudizi naturali. In Filosofia e cultura nel Settecento britannico, ed. A. Santucci, 113–124. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  6. Hume, David. 2004. A Treatise of human nature, ed. David F. Norton and Mary J. Norton. Oxford: Oxford University Press (also: ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge and P.H. Nidditch, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978).Google Scholar
  7. Kail, Peter J.E. 2005. Hume’s ethical conclusion. In Impressions of Hume, ed. M. Frasca-Spada and J.E. Kail. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  8. Kail, Peter J.E. 2007. Projection and realism in Hume. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kemp Smith, Norman. 1947. The philosophy of David Hume. London: Thomas Nelson and Sons.Google Scholar
  10. Labrousse, Elisabeth. 1964. Pierre Bayle, 2 vols. La Haye: M. Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  11. Livingston, Donald W. 1988. Hume’s philosophy of common life. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Mori, Gianluca. 1999. Bayle philosophe. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
  13. Paganini, Gianni. 1980. Analisi della fede e critica della ragione nella filosofia di Pierre Bayle. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
  14. Paganini, Gianni. 1996. Hume et Bayle: conjonction locale et immatérialité de l’âme. In De l’Humanisme aux Lumières, Bayle et le protestantisme, ed. M. Magdeleine, 701–713. Oxford-Paris: Universitas-Voltaire Foundation.Google Scholar
  15. Paganini, Gianni. 2004. Hume, Bayle et les Dialogues concerning natural religion. In Pierre Bayle dans la République des Lettres, ed. A. McKenna and G. Paganini, 527–567. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
  16. Paganini, Gianni. 2008. Skepsis. Le débat des modernes sur le scepticisme. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  17. Russell, Paul. 1995. Hume’s Treatise and the Clarke-Collins Controversy. Hume Studies 21: 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ryan, Todd. 2009. Pierre Bayle’s Cartesian metaphysics: Rediscovering early modern philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Santucci, Antonio. 2003. Hume vecchio e nuovo? In Filosofia, scienza e politica nel Settecento britannico, ed. Luigi Turco, 255–276. Padova: Il Poligrafo.Google Scholar
  20. Strawson, Galen. 1989. The secret connexion: Causation, realism, and David Hume. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  21. Turco, Luigi. 1998. Mente e corpo nel Trattato di Hume. In L’età dei Lumi. Saggi sulla cultura settecentesca, ed. Antonio Santucci. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  22. Winkler, Kenneth P. 1991. The New Hume. Philosophical Review 100: 541–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wright, John P. 1983. The sceptical realism of David Hume. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Yolton, John W. 1983. Thinking matter. Materialism in eighteenth-century Britain. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Studi UmanisticiUniversità del Piemonte OrientaleVercelliItaly

Personalised recommendations