Advertisement

Dynamic Assessment of Narrative Competence

  • Chiel van der Veen
  • Mariëlle Poland
Chapter
Part of the International perspectives on early childhood education and development book series (CHILD, volume 7)

Abstract

In Developmental Education, language plays an essential role as a tool for communication (and thinking). Learning to produce coherent messages (“narratives”) with both cultural and personal value in the context of meaningful socio-cultural practices is considered as an important goal of Developmental Education. Narratives are essential for human action as they function as a tool for giving meaning to reality. Therefore, close observation and assessment of children’s narratives is essential in the context of Developmental Education. Over the past years we have developed a Dynamic Assessment (DA) instrument for assessing children’s narrative competence. This instrument combines two common approaches to DA, namely standardised interventionist DA and interactionist DA. With the help of this instrument, teachers are able to gain insight into children’s actual narrative competence as well as their developmental potential and their receptivity to certain forms of assistance to reach this potential. Our experience up to now shows that it is possible to assess children’s narrative competence in a valid and reliable manner.

Keywords

Travel Agency Proximal Development Dynamic Assessment Cooperative Dialogue Narrative Development 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, A., & Ferrara, F. A. (1985). Diagnosing zones of proximal development. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition. Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 273–305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bruner, J. S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Budoff, M. (1987). The validity of learning potential assessment. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactive approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 52–81). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  7. Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., Ferrara, R. A., & Bryant, N. R. (1984). The zone of proximal development: Implications for individual differences and learning. In B. Rogoff & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), Children’s learning in the “zone of proximal development” (pp. 77–91). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  8. Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1992). Principles of dynamic assessment: The application of a specific model. Learning and Individual Differences, 4, 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cassirer, E. (1957). The philosophy of symbolic forms (Vol. 3): The phenomenology of knowledge. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Egan, K. (2006). Teaching literacy. Engaging the imagination of new readers and writers. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  11. Egan, K., & Gajdamaschko, N. (2003). Some cognitive tools of literacy. In A. Kozulin et al. (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 83–98). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elkonin, D. B. (1998). Epilogue. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky. Vol. 5: Child psychology. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  13. Engel, S. (1999). The stories children tell. Making sense of the narratives of childhood. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  14. Engel, S. (2003). My harmless inside heart turned green: children’s narratives and their inner lives. In B. van Oers (Ed.), Narratives of childhood. Theoretical and practical explorations for the innovation of early childhood education (pp. 39–50). Amsterdam: VU University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., Falik, L., & Rand, Y. (2003). Dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability. Jerusalem: ICELP.Google Scholar
  16. Guthke, J., Heinrich, A., & Caruso, M. (1986). The diagnostic program of “syntactical rule and vocabulary acquisition” – A contribution to the psychodiagnosis of foreign language learning ability. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities. Mechanisms and performances (pp. 903–911). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  17. Janssen-Vos, F., Pompert, B., & van Oers, E. (2007). HOREB-PO. Handelingsgericht Observeren, Registreren en Evalueren van Basisontwikkeling [Action-oriented observation, registration, and evaluation of basic development]. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  18. Knijpstra, H., et al. (1997). Met jou kan ik lezen en schrijven. Een ontwikkelingsgerichte didactiek voor het leren lezen en schrijven in groep 3 en 4 [With you I can read and write. Developmental didactics for learning to read and write in grades 1 and 2]. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  19. Lantolf, J. P. (2009). Dynamic assessment: The dialectic integration of instruction and assessment. Language Teaching, 42(3), 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leontev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice hall.Google Scholar
  21. Leontev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
  22. Lidz, C. S. (1991). Practitioner’s guide to dynamic assessment. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  23. Luria, A. R. (1961). Study of the abnormal child. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry: A Journal of Human Behaviour, 31(1), 1–16.Google Scholar
  24. Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development. Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. McNamee, G. D. (1979). The social interaction origins of narrative skills. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 1(4), 63–68.Google Scholar
  26. Nelson, K. (1996). Language in cognitive development. The emergence of the mediated mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment. A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting L2 development. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2010). Vygotsky’s teaching-assessment dialectic and L2 education. The case for dynamic assessment. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 17(4), 312–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Poland, M. (2005). Het toetsen van narratieve competentie bij jonge kinderen in de onderbouw [Assessing young children’s narrative competence in early childhood education]. Unpublished master’s thesis, VU University, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  30. Pléh, C. (2003). Narrativity in text construction and self construction. Neohelicon, 30(1), 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pompert, B. (2004). Thema’s en taal [Themes and language education]. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  32. Pompert, B., & Janssen-Vos, F. (2003). From narrator to writer. Promoting cultural learning in early childhood. In B. van Oers (Ed.), Narratives of childhood. Theoretical and practical explorations for the innovation of early childhood education (pp. 127–145). Amsterdam: VU University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing. The nature and measurement of learning potential. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Tomasello, M. (2010). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  35. van der Veen, C. (2010). Towards abstract thinking in a fifth dimension site: Children taking the role of junior editor at a news-paper. Unpublished master’s thesis, VU University, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  36. van Oers, B. (Ed.). (2003). Narratives of childhood. Theoretical and practical explorations for the innovation of early childhood education. Amsterdam: VU University Press.Google Scholar
  37. van Oers, B. (2007). Helping young children to become literate: The relevance of narrative competence for developmental education. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 15(3), 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van Oers, B. (2009). Narrativiteit in leerprocessen. Pedagogische Studiën, 86(2), 147–156.Google Scholar
  39. van Oers, B. (2010). Imitative participation and the development of abstract thinking in primary school. Internal Publication Department Theory and Research in Education. Amsterdam: VU University.Google Scholar
  40. van Oers, B. (2011). Where is the child? Controversy in the Neo-Vygotskian approach to child development. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 18(1), 84–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In L.S. Vygotsky, collected works. Vol. 1 (pp. 39–285) (R. Rieber & A. Carton, Eds.; N. Minick, Trans.). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  43. Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. R. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 99–174). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Theory and Research in EducationVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.De Activiteit, National, Centre for Developmental EducationAlkmaarThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Educational and Pedagogical ConsultancyWieringerwerfThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations