Advertisement

Diverse, Disengaged and Reactive: A Teacher’s Adaptation of Ethical Dilemma Story Pedagogy as a Strategy to Re-engage Learners in Education for Sustainability

  • Elisabeth (Lily) Taylor
  • Peter Charles TaylorEmail author
  • MeiLing Chow
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 8)

Abstract

It is of great concern that science education is failing to impress many young people to engage deeply in learning, in learning for a purpose other than preparing for tests and exams. Many of these future decision-makers demonstrate a sense of hopelessness and helplessness with regard to the challenges lying ahead of them, particularly global issues of sustainability, with many feeling disempowered. So, what can be done to reverse the trend of disengagement? In this chapter, we present an overview of ongoing research into science teachers’ adaptation of ethical dilemma story pedagogy as a classroom strategy for enacting socially responsible education with a special focus on sustainability. This pedagogical approach marries values and ethics education with science and environmental education. It promotes dilemma-based, content-related and values-dependent decision-making. Teachers participated in our research with a view to re-engaging academically and socioculturally diverse, and often disenchanted, learners in science education by linking ethical dilemma stories to science and sustainability topics directly relevant to community issues. Education for sustainability has far-reaching implications for many learning areas, especially science education which is well suited to providing the necessary knowledge, skills and values base for informed ethical decision-making with a view to achieving a sustainable future for the world. Drawing on the results of a recent case study of an innovative science teacher engaging her students in education for sustainability, we address the question: What makes ethical dilemma story teaching compelling for students?

Keywords

Science Education Science Teacher Ethical Dilemma Moral Development Aboriginal Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allchin, D. (1998). Values in science and in science education. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1083–1092). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Agency (ACARA). (n.d.a). Australian curriculum – Cross curriculum priorities. Retrieved February 4, 2012, from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/CrossCurriculumPriorities
  3. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Agency (ACARA). (n.d.b). Australian curriculum – Cross curriculum priorities in science. Retrieved February 4, 2012, from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/Science/CrossCurriculumPriorities
  4. Australian Government - Department of Education, Science and Technology. (2005). National framework for values education in Australian schools. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  5. Australian Government – Department of Sustainability, Water, Environment, Population and Communities. (2011, October 18). Australian sustainable schools initiative (AuSSI). Retrieved November 12, 2011, from http://www.environment.gov.au/education/aussi/
  6. Australian Government – Department of Water, Environment, Heritage and the Arts. (2010). Sustainability curriculum framework. Retrieved November 14, 2011, from http://environment.gov.au/education/publications/pubs/curriculum-framework.pdf
  7. Australian Goverment – Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). (1999). The Adelaide declaration on national goals for schooling in the twenty-first century. Retrieved 11 March 2009, from http://www.curriculum.edu.au/mceetya/nationalgoals/index.htm
  8. Bowers, C. A. (1993). Critical essays on education, modernity, and the recovery of the ecological imperative. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chow, M-L., Taylor, E. (nee Settelmaier), Taylor, P. & Hashim, J. (2011, June 29–July 2). Enhancing engagement of students in science through use of ethical dilemma stories. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Conference of the Australasian Science Education Research Association Conference, Adelaide, SA.Google Scholar
  10. Covey, S. R. (1989). The seven habits of highly effective people. Melbourne: The Business Library.Google Scholar
  11. Covey, S. R. (2004). The 8th habit: From effectiveness to greatness. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  12. Depaepe, M., & Smeyers, P. (2008). Educationalization as an ongoing modernization process. Educational Theory, 58(4), 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fien, J. (2001). Education for sustainability: Reorienting Australian schools for a sustainable future. Fitzroy: The Australian Conservation Foundation.Google Scholar
  14. Fien, J. (2003). Learning to care: Education and compassion. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 19, 1–13.Google Scholar
  15. Forrest, S. (2002). That’s my mob: Aboriginal identity. In G. Partington (Ed.), Perspectives on Aborginal and Torres Strait Islander education (pp. 96–105). Riverwood: Social Science Press Australia.Google Scholar
  16. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Government of Western Australia – Curriculum Council. (2010). K-10 syllabus: Early adolescence science. Retrieved February 15, 2011, from http://www.curriculum.wa.edu.au/internet/Years_K10/Curriculum_Resources
  18. Gower, B. S. (1992). What do we owe future generations? In D. E. Cooper & J. A. Palmer (Eds.), The environment in question: Ethics and global issues (pp. 1–12). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Gschweitl, R., Mattner-Begusch, B., Neumayr nee Settelmaier, E., & Schwetz, H. (1998). Neue Werte der Werterziehung: Anregende Lernumgebung zur Anbahnung uberdauernder Werthaltungen bei Jugendlichen [New values in values-education: Engaging learning environments for initiating values and attitudes in adolescents]. In O. Jugendrotkreuz (Ed.), Gibt es nur einen Weg: Informations- und Unterrichtsmaterialien zur Friedenserziehung und Konfliktarbeit im Sinne der Genfer Abkommen und des Humanitaren Volkerrechts [Is there only one way: Information and curriculum materials for peace education and conflict work in the sense of the Geneva Convention and the Charta of Human Rights] (Vol. 2, pp. 13–21). Vienna: OBV Pädagogischer Verlag.Google Scholar
  20. Killen, M., Margie, N. G., & Sinno, S. (2010). Morality in the context of intergroup relationships. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 155–184). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kohlberg, L. (1984). Essays on moral development: The psychology of moral development. The nature and validity of moral stages (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  22. Laszlo, E. (2008). Quantum shift in the global brain: How the new scientific reality can change us and our world. Rochester: Inner Traditions.Google Scholar
  23. McInerney, J. D. (1986). Ethical values in biology education. In M. J. Frazer & A. Kornhauser (Eds.), Ethics and social responsibility in science education (Vol. 2, pp. 175–181). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  24. Moore, K. (2006). Science and sustainable development. Retrieved April 2011, from Berkeley Science Review, (Spring), 40–42. http://www.sciencereview.berkeley.edu/
  25. Nucci, L. (2010). Education for moral development. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 657–681). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  26. Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  27. Palmer, P. J. (1993). To know as we are known: Education as a spiritual journey. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  28. Robottom, I. (2012). Socio-scientific issues in education: Innovative practices and contending epistemologies. Research in Science Education, 42, 95–107. doi: 10.1007/s11165-011-9258-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Robottom, I., & Simonneaux, L. (2012). Editorial: Socio-Scientific issues and education for sustainability in contemporary education. Research in Science Education, 42, 1–4. doi: 10.1007/s11165-011-9253-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ryan, J. (1992). Aboriginal learning styles: A critical review. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 5(3), 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Settelmaier, E. (2009). ‘Adding zest’ to science education: Transforming the culture of science classrooms through ethical dilemma story pedagogy. Saarbrucken: VDM.Google Scholar
  32. Settelmaier, E., Taylor, P., & Hill, J. (2010). Supporting teacher, challenging students: Socially responsible science for critical scientific literacy. Refereed paper presented at the XIV IOSTE Symposium: Socio-cultural and human values in science and technology education, 13–18 June, Bled, Slovenia. ISBN 978-961-92882-1-4.Google Scholar
  33. Sharma, A. (2012). Global climate change: What has science education got to do with it? Science Education, 21, 33–53. doi: 10.1007/s11191-011-9372-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smetana, J. (2010). Social-cognitive domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), The handbook of moral development (pp. 119–154). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  35. Srivastava, A. K. (2005). Buddhist environmentalism. In D. C. Srivastava (Ed.), Readings in environmental ethics: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 138–149). Jaipur/New Delhi: Rawat.Google Scholar
  36. Tappan, M. (1997). Language, culture and moral development: A Vygotskian perspective. Developmental Review, 17, 78–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tappan, M. (2010). Mediated moralities: Socio-cultural approaches to moral development. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 351–374). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  38. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). (2011). Science and technology education. Retrieved April 21, 2011, from UNESCO education: http://www.unesco.org/new/en/education/themes/strengthening-education-systems/science-and-technology/
  39. United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Uzzell, D. (2008). Challenging assumptions in the psychology of climate change (T. A. Society, Ed.). Retrieved 2011, from InPsych: http://www.psychology.org.au/publications/inpsych/highlights2008/#s3
  41. van Eijck, M., & Roth, W. M. (2007). Improving science education for sustainable development. Retrieved April 2011, from OpenAccess Plos Biology: www.plosbiology.org
  42. Zeidler, D. (1984). Moral issues and social policy in science education: Closing the literacy gap. Science Education, 68(4), 411–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elisabeth (Lily) Taylor
    • 1
  • Peter Charles Taylor
    • 2
    Email author
  • MeiLing Chow
    • 2
  1. 1.School of EducationCurtin UniversityBentleyAustralia
  2. 2.Science and Mathematics Education CentreCurtin UniversityBentleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations