How should we farm? The ethical dimension of farming systems

Chapter

Abstract

If Farming Systems Research is to truly embrace sustainability as the overall context of its mission, then the inclusion of ethics (and especially systemic ethics) is an imperative. There are matters of responsibilities of producers to the ecological integrity of the land that they farm as well as to the manner by which they use resources. There are matters of equity and fairness and trustworthiness to the consumers of their products, and matters of the well-being of animals under their care. There are, furthermore, particular responsibilities that farming systems researchers have to the way that they conduct their scientific inquiries and develop and promote the types of technologies that they help to generate. These issues raise questions that call upon consideration of rights and wrongs, of means as well as ends, of good and evil, and of what it is to be virtuous. These are ethical questions about what ‘should be done’ with respect to the further development of farming systems that ought to condition the answers to questions about what ‘could be done’. This chapter will discuss the significance of the moral/ethical dimensions of agriculture and farming, as well as of agricultural sciences. It will show how the implementation of the principles of sustainability ethics ‘ought to’ shape Farming Systems Research.

Keywords

Farming System Epistemological Belief Moral Consciousness Agricultural Sustainability Ethical Competency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bawden, R. J. (1996). On the systems dimension of FSR. Journal of Farming Systems Research and Extension, 5, 1–18.Google Scholar
  2. Bawden, R. J. (1997) Learning to persist: A systemic view of development. In: F. A. Stowell, R. L. Ison, R. Armson, J. Holloway, S. Jackson, & S. McRobb (Eds.), Systems for sustainability: People, organizations and environments. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the UK Society for Systems Sciences, Milton Keynes (pp. 1–5). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bawden, R. J. (2007). Knowing systems and the environment. In J. Pretty, A. Ball, T. Benton, J. Guivant, D. Lee, D. Orr, M. Pfeffer, & H. Ward (Eds.), Sage handbook on environment and society (pp. 224–234). London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new society. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Busch, L. (2000). The eclipse of morality: Science, state and market. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  6. Churchman, C. W. (1971). The design of inquiring systems. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Churchman, C. W. (1979). The systems approach and its enemies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Comstock, G. L. (2002). Ethics. In G. L. Comstock (Ed.), Life science ethics. Ames: Iowa State Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cotgrove, S. (1982). Catastrophe or cornucopia. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Craig, E. (Ed.). (2005). The shorter Routledge encyclopaedia of philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Cribb, J. (2010). The coming famine: The global food crises and what we can do about it. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Davison, A. (2001). Technology and the contested meanings of technology. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  13. Douglass, G. K. (1984). The meanings of agricultural sustainability. In G. K. Douglass (Ed.), Agricultural sustainability in a changing world (pp. 3–29). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dyson, A., & Harris, J. (Eds.). (1994). Ethics and biotechnology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. FAO. (2004). The ethics of sustainable agricultural intensification. From http://www.fao.org/ethics/index-en.htm. Accessed 20 Oct 2011.
  16. FAO. (Undated). Ethics in food and agriculture. From http://www.fao.org/ethics/index-en.htm. Accessed 20 Oct2011.
  17. Gaspar, D. (2004). Ethics and development: From economism to human development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Greene, J. D. (2007). The secret joke of Kant’s soul. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, Vol. 3: The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, disease, and development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Korthals, M., & Borgers, R. J. (Eds.). (2004). Ethics for life sciences. Amsterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Leopold, A. (1949). A sand county almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. MacGilchrist, I. (2010). The master and his emissary: The divided brain and the making of the Western World. New Haven. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology and practice. New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
  23. Miller, A. (1983). The influence of personal biases on environmental problem solving. Journal of Environmental Management, 17, 133–142.Google Scholar
  24. Reynolds, M. (2007). Evaluation based on critical systems heuristics. In B. Williams & I. Imam (Eds.), Systems concepts in evaluation: An expert anthology (pp. 101–121). Point Reyes: EdgePress of Inverness.Google Scholar
  25. Singer, P. (1975). Animal liberation. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar
  26. Somerville, M. (2004). The ethical canary. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Straughan, R. R. (1995). Ethical issues of crop biotechnology. In T. B. Mepham, G. A. Tucker, & J. Wiseman (Eds.), Issues in agricultural bioethics (pp. 163–176). Nottingham: Nottingham University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Thompson, P. B. (1995). The spirit of the soil: Agricultural and environmental ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Thompson, P. B. (1998). Agricultural ethics: Research, teaching and public policy. Ames: Iowa University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Thompson, P. B. (2007a). Ethics on the frontiers of livestock science. In D. L. Swain, E. Charmley, J. W. Steel, & S. G. Coffey (Eds.), Redesigning animal agriculture: The challenge of the 21st century (pp. 30–35). Cambridge: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thompson, P. B. (2007b). Agricultural sustainability: What it is and what it is not. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 5, 5–16.Google Scholar
  32. Thompson, P. B. (Ed.). (2008). The ethics of intensification: Agricultural development and cultural change. Amsterdam: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical heuristics of social planning: A new approach to practical philosophy. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar
  34. Ulrich, W. (1987). Critical heuristics of social system design. European Journal of Operations Research, 31, 276–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ulrich, W. (1993). Some difficulties of ecological thinking, considered from a critical systems perspective: A plea for critical holism. Systems Practice, 6, 583–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ulrich, W. (1996). Critical systems thinking for citizens: A research proposal (Centre for Systems Studies Research Memorandum #10). Hull: University of Hull.Google Scholar
  37. Wals, A., & Bawden, R. J. (2000). Integrating sustainability into agricultural education: Dealing with complexity, uncertainty and diverging worldviews. Interuniversity conference for agricultural and related sciences in Europe (ICA). AFANet. University of Gent.Google Scholar
  38. Wright, R. (1994). The moral animal why we are the way we are: The new science of evolutionary psychology. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  39. Zimdahl, R. L. (2006). Agriculture’s ethical horizon. Amsterdam: Academic.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Health and ScienceUniversity of Western SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations