Frameworks for Examining the Intersections of Race, Ethnicity, Class, and Gender on English Language Learners in K-12 Science Education in the USA

  • Sonya N. Martin
  • Beth Wassell
  • Kathryn Scantlebury
Chapter
Part of the Cultural Studies of Science Education book series (CSSE, volume 5)

Abstract

In this chapter, we argue that intersectionality and cultural sociology can be used as complementary theoretical frameworks to gain multifaceted understandings about the learning needs of language minority (LM) and English language learner (ELL) students in science classrooms. By employing these frameworks, researchers can better understand the complex relationship between globalization and e|im|migration at global levels and the resulting impacts on school environments at local levels. We draw connections between international migration patterns and the impact on individual teachers, students, and communities in local contexts to illustrate some of the challenges facing teachers and students in linguistically and ethnically diverse science classrooms in two urban K-8 schools. We conclude this chapter by raising some questions related to policy, teacher practice, and science teacher education, which we feel are critical for promoting the academic success of LM/ELL students in K-12 science classrooms in the USA.

Keywords

Science Classroom Language Proficiency Language Minority English Language Learner Science Teacher Education 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This material is based upon work supported, in part, by the National Science Foundation, HRD 1036637. G-SPELL Gender and Science Proficiency for English Language Learners. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

References

  1. August, D., & Hakuta, K. (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bautista, N., & Casteneda, M. (2010). Teaching science to ELLs, part I. The Science Teacher, 78(3), 35–39.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, Y. G., Hakuta, K., & Witt, D. (2000). How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency? (The University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute Policy Report 2000–1), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
  4. Capps, R., Fix, M., Murray, J., Ost, J., Passel, J., & Herwantoro, S. (2005). The new demography of America’s schools: Immigration and the NCLB Act. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  5. Carter, L. (2008). Globalization and science education: The implications for science in the new economy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 617–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clothey, R., Mills, M., & Baumgarten, J. (2010). A closer look at the impact of globalization on science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(2), 305–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collier, V. (1987). Age and rate of acquisition of second language for academic purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 21(4), 617–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fine, M., Jaffe-Walter, R., Pedraza, P., Futch, V., & Stoudt, B. (2007). Swimming: On oxygen, resistance, and possibility for immigrant youth under siege. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 38(1), 76–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fix, M., & Passel, J. (2003). U.S. immigration—Trends and implications for schools. Washington, DC: Immigration Studies Program, Urban Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garcia, O., Kleifgen, J. A., & Falchi, L. (2008). From English language learners to emergent bilinguals. A research initiative of the campaign for educational equity (Equity matters: Research Review No. 1). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  11. Hancock, A. M. (2007). When multiplication doesn’t equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5, 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ingersoll, R. M. (2007, February). Misdiagnosing the teacher quality problem (CPRE Policy Brief No. RB-49). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.Google Scholar
  13. International Organization for Migration. (2010). About migration: Facts and figures. Retrieved May 2, 2010, from http://www.iom.int/jahia/Jahia/about-migration/facts-and-figures/lang/en
  14. Kindler, A. (2002). Survey of the states’ limited English proficient students and available educational programs and services: 2000–2001 summary report. Report prepared for the US Department of Education, Office of English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement and Academic Achievement for Limited English Proficient Students (OELA). Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition and Language Instruction Educational Programs. Retrieved from http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/policy/states/reports/seareports/0001/sea0001.pdf
  15. Lee, S. J. (1996). Unravelling the model minority stereotype: Listening to the voices of Asian American youth. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  16. Louie, V. (2005). Immigrant newcomer populations, ESEA, and the pipeline to college: Current considerations and future lines of inquiry. Review of Research in Education, 29, 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martin, S. (2006). Where practice and theory intersect in the chemistry classroom: Using cogenerative dialogue to identify the critical point in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(4), 693–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martin, S. (2010). “Act locally, publish globally”: International/multi-disciplinary research efforts needed to understand the impact of globalization on science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(2), 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martin, S., & Scantlebury, K. (2009). More than a conversation: Using cogenerative dialogues in the professional development of high school chemistry teachers. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(2), 119–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martínez-León, N., & Smith, P. (2003). Educating for bilingualism in Mexican transnational communities. NABE Journal of Research and Practice, 1(1), 138–148.Google Scholar
  21. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30, 1771–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Migration Information Source. (2008). U.S. in focus: Frequently requested statistics on immigrants and immigration in the United States. Migration Policy Institute. Retrieved on August 19, 2010, from http://www.migrationinformation.org/USfocus/display.cfm?ID=747#2f
  23. Morse, A. (2005). A look at immigrant youth: Prospects and promising practices. Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures.Google Scholar
  24. National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). Retrieved online from http://nces.ed.gov
  25. Ngo, B. (2006). Learning from the margins: The education of Southeast and South Asian Americans in context. Race, Ethnicity, and Education, 9(1), 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Noguera, P. A. (2003). City schools and the American dream. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  27. Pedraza, J. S. (1996). Saving and strengthening indigenous Mexican languages: The CELIAC experience. In N. Hornberger (Ed.), Indigenous languages in the Americas: Language planning from the bottom up (pp. 171–187). New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  28. Portes, A. (2001). Introduction: The debates and significance of immigrant transnational communities. Global Networks, 1(3), 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Richardson Bruna, K. (2010). Mexican immigrant transnational social capital and class transformation examining the role of peer mediation in insurgent science. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(2), 383–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Richardson Bruna, K., & Vann, R. (2007). On pigs & packers: Radically contextualizing a practice of science with Mexican immigrant students. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2(1), 19–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sacks, A., & Watnick, B. (2006). A snapshot of teacher perceptions on full inclusion in an international urban community: Miami-Dade County, Florida. The Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 7(1), 67–74.Google Scholar
  32. Saverino, J. (2007). The 9th street market and South Philadelphia: Personal connections, particular views, past times, and embodied places. Historical Society of Pennsylvania. Retrieved on July 1, 2010, from http://www.hsp.org/default.aspx?id=1077
  33. School District of Philadelphia [SDP]. (2009). School profile: Demographics and ethnicity. Retrieved on February 17, 2009, from https://webapps.philasd.org/school_profile/view/2510
  34. School District of Philadelphia [SDP]. (2011). School profile: Demographics and ethnicity. Retrieved on April 29, 2011, from https://webapps.philasd.org/school_profile/view/2510
  35. Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation. The American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shields, S. (2008). Gender: An intersectionality approach. Sex Roles, 59, 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Short, D., & Fitzsimmons, S. (2007). Double the work: Challenges and solutions to acquiring language and academic literacy for adolescent English language learners. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.Google Scholar
  38. Singer, A., Vitiello, D., Katz, M., & Park, D. (2008). Recent immigration to Philadelphia: Regional change in a re-emerging gateway. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, Metropolitan Policy Program.Google Scholar
  39. US Census Bureau. (2006). Hispanic population of the United States. The 2006 American Community Survey. Retrieved on March 12, 2009, from http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/hispanic/hispanic_pop_presentation.html
  40. Vang, C. T. (2005). Minority students are far from academic success and still at-risk in public schools. Multicultural Education, 12(4), 9–15.Google Scholar
  41. Vertovec, S. (1999). Conceiving and researching transnationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wassell, B., Hawrylak, M. F., & LaVan, S. K. (2010). Examining the structures that impact English language learners’ agency in urban high schools: Resources and roadblocks in the classroom. Education and Urban Society, 42, 599–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Welcoming Center for New Pennsylvanians (WCNP). (2009). PA and immigration: Asians. Retrieved on March 2, 2009, from http://www.welcomingcenter.org/immigrationPA/asia.php
  44. World Migration Report (WMR). (2008). Managing labour mobility in the evolving global economy. Geneva: International Organization for Migration.Google Scholar
  45. Zehler, A., Fleischman, H., Hopstock, P., Stephenson, T., Pendizick, M., & Sapru, S. (2003). Descriptive study of services to LEP students and LEP students with disabilities (Contract No ED-00-CO-0089). Policy Report submitted to US Department of Education, (OELA).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sonya N. Martin
    • 1
  • Beth Wassell
    • 2
  • Kathryn Scantlebury
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Biology Education, College of EducationSeoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.College of EducationRowan UniversityGlassboroUSA
  3. 3.Department of Chemistry & BiochemistryUniversity of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations