Advertisement

Parallel Universes? Digital Physics?

  • Mario Bunge
Chapter
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science book series (BSPS, volume 295)

Abstract

Every original idea is imaginative, because only imagination can trigger creativity. This is why imagination is just as essential in science and technology as in the arts and humanities. The difference between these two pairs of fields is that in science and technology imagination is disciplined rather than free. What motivates such discipline is the objective truth requirement.

Keywords

Virtual World Feynman Diagram Digital Physic Virtual Particle Transit Rule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barrow, John D., W. Paul, Davies, L. Charles, and J.R. Harper (eds.). 2004. Science and ultimate reality: quantum theory, cosmology, and complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bunge, Mario. 1959. Metascientific queries. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas, Publisher.Google Scholar
  3. Bunge, Mario. 1970. Virtual processes and virtual particles: Real or fictitious? International Journal of Theoretical Physics 3: 507–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bunge, Mario. 1983. Speculation: Wild and sound. New Ideas in Psychology 1: 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bunge, Mario. 1998. Social science under debate. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  6. Buss, David M. 2004. Evolutionary psychology: The New science of the mind, 2nd ed. Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  7. Chaitin, Gregory. 2006. Meta math! New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  8. Davies, Paul, and Niels H. Gregersen (eds.). 2010. Information and the nature of reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dennett, Daniel C. 1995. Darwin’s dangerous idea. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  10. Everett III, Hugh. 1957. “Relative state” formulation of quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 29: 454–462.Google Scholar
  11. Feyerabend, Paul K. 1978. Against method. Repr. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Greene, Brian. 2011. The hidden reality. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  13. Hawking, Stephen, and Leonard Mlodinow. 2010. The grand design. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
  14. McMullin, Ernan. 2010. From matter to materialism—And (almost) back. In Davies and Gregersen, eds., pp. 13–37.Google Scholar
  15. SLAC. 2011. http://www.2.slac.stanford.edu//vvc/theory/virtual.html.Google Scholar
  16. Tegmark, Max. May 2003. Parallel universes. Scientific American 288(5): 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vendral, Vlakto. 2010. Decoding reality: The universe as quantum information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Wheeler, John A. 1962. Empty space-time as the building material of the physical world. In Logic, methodology and philosophy of science: Proceedings of the 1960 international congress, ed. E. Nagel, P. Suppes, and A. Tarski, 361–374. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Wilczeck, Frank. 2008. The lightness of being: Mass, ether, and the unification of forces. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Bunge
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations