Advertisement

Shen Dao’s Theory of fa and His Influence on Han Fei

  • Soon-ja Yang
Chapter
Part of the Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy book series (DCCP)

Abstract

It has been generally agreed that Han Fei was influenced by Shen Dao 慎到in terms of the concept shi 勢 (circumstantial advantage, power or authority). This conventional view, which is based the “Critique of Circumstantial Advantage” (“Nanshi” 難勢) chapter of the Han Feizi, would lead us to believe that Shen Dao was a theorist of shi. This article attempts to examine whether Shen Dao’s main idea is shi by analyzing Shenzi 愼子fragments and other early Chinese texts. Contrary to the traditional view of Shen Dao, this article shows that his central idea is relevant to a theory of fa法 (law, standard or model).

In addition, this article proposes a reason why Han Fei cited Shen Dao’s theory of shi in the “Nanshi” chapter despite the fact that Shen Dao’s writings give detailed discussions of another concept, fa. Han Fei was influenced by Shen Dao’s insight that shi (political authority or power) takes precedence over moral and intellectual superiority (xianzhi 賢智) in drawing obedience from people. In other words, Han Fei quoted Shen Dao in the “Nanshi” chapter not because Shen Dao focused on the concept of shi, but because he pointed out that political power or authority takes precedence over other individual capabilities in achieving political control.

Keywords

Political Authority Average Ruler Chinese Text Legal Positivism Warring State Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Works Cited

  1. Ames, Roger. 1994. The art of rulership: A study of ancient Chinese political thought. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  2. Asano, Yūichi浅野裕一. 1992. The formation and development of the way of Huang Lao 黄老道の成立と展開. Tokyo 東京: Sōbunsha 創文社.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, T.H. 1980. On the transmission of the Shen Tzu and of the Yang sheng Yao chi. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2: 168–176. (Survey of the transmission of the Shenzi fragments.)Google Scholar
  4. Bobbio, Norberto. 1993. Thomas hobbes and the natural law tradition. Trans. Daniela Gobetti. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, Qiyou 陳奇猷. 2000. Han Feizi, with new collations and commentary 韓非子新校注. Shanghai 上海: Guji 古籍. (A comprehensive commentary of the Han Feizi.)Google Scholar
  6. Creel, H.G. 1974. Shen Pu-hai. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Eno, Robert. 1990. The Confucian creation of heaven: philosophy and the defense of ritual mastery. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  8. Finkelstein, Claire, (ed.). 2005. Hobbes on Law. Aldershot/Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  9. Fung, Yu-lan (1895–1990). 1952–53. A history of Chinese philosophy. Trans. Derk Bodde. 2nd ed. 2 vols. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gao, Yinxiu 高銀秀, and Zhang Zhihua張志華. 1988. A brief discussion of Shen Dao’s thought on the rule of law 慎到法治思想簡論. Jinyang Journal 晉陽學刊6: 88–93. (Research on Shen Dao’s legalistic ideas with emphasis on fa 法, shu 術, and shi 勢)Google Scholar
  11. Goldin, Paul Rakita. 1999. Rituals of the way: The philosophy of Xunzi. Chicago/La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  12. Graham, A.C. 1989. Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical argument in ancient China. La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  13. Graham, A.C. 1990. Studies in Chinese philosophy and philosophical literature. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hampton, Jean. 1988. Hobbes and the social contract tradition. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hart, H.L.A. 1994. The concept of law, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hsiao, Kung-chuan. 1979. A history of chinese political thought. Vol. I: From the beginnings to the sixth century A.D. Tr. F.W. Mote. Princeton Library of Asian Translations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jiang, Ronghai江榮海. 1989. Shen Dao must be a Huang-Lao thinker 慎到應是黃老思想家. Beijing University Journal 北京大學學報1: 110–116. (Research on Shen Dao’s Huang-Lao views in comparison with Lao Zi and Han Fei.)Google Scholar
  18. Jullien, François. 1995. The propensity of things: Toward a history of efficacy in China. Trans. Janet Lloyd. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  19. Lau, D.C., and Ames, Roger T. 2003, (Trans.). Sun bin: The art of warfare: A translation of the classic chinese work of philosophy and strategy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lewis, Mark Edward. 1999. Writing and authority in early China. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  21. Liu, Bin 劉斌. 1998. A brief discussion of Shen Dao’s thought on the rule of law 慎子法治思想概述. Guanzi Journal 管子學刊1: 29–33. (Research on Shen Dao’s legalistic ideas.)Google Scholar
  22. Loewe, Michael (ed.). 1993. Early Chinese texts: A biblical guide. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  23. Lu, Ruirong盧瑞容. 2004. A discussion of the ideas of relative relationships in ancient China: An analysis of the origin of the notions of strategic advantage, harmony, weighing, and flexion 中國古代「相對關係」思維探討: 「勢」「和」「權」「屈曲」槪念溯源分析. Taipei: Shangding wenhua 商鼎文化.Google Scholar
  24. Lundahl, Bertil. 1992. Han Fei Zi: The man and the work. Stockholm: Institute of Oriental Languages, Stockholm University. (A comprehensive translation of the Han Feizi.)Google Scholar
  25. Luo, Duxiu 羅獨修. 2002. A study of the subtleties of the ideas of rule by strategic advantage in the pre-Qin period 先秦勢治思想探微. Taipei: Zhongguo Wenhua Daxue 中國文化大學.Google Scholar
  26. Makeham, John. 1994. Name and actuality in early Chinese thought. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  27. Murphy, Mark C. 1995. Was Hobbes a legal positivist? Ethics 105: 846–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murphy, James B. 2005. The philosophy of positive law: Foundations of jurisprudence. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Murphy, Jeffrie G., and Jules L. Coleman. 1990. Philosophy of law: An introduction to jurisprudence. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  30. Peerenboom, R.P. 1993. Law and morality in ancient China: The silk manuscripts of Huang-Lao. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  31. Pines, Yuri. 2005. Disputers of abdication: Zhanguo egalitarianism and the sovereign’s power. T’oung Pao 91(4–5): 243–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Raz, Joseph. 1985. Authority, law and morality. The Monist 68(3): 295–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schwartz, Benjamin I. 1985. The world of thought in ancient China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Silk Manuscripts from the Han Tomb at Mawangdui 馬王堆漢墓帛書. (1980–1983). 3 vols. to date. Beijing: Wenwu 文物.Google Scholar
  35. Thompson, P.M. 1979. The Shen-tzu fragments. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Far-ranging and insightful survey of the Shenzi fragments.)Google Scholar
  36. Wang Xianqian 王先謙 (1842–1918). 1988. Xunzi, with collected explanations 荀子集解, ed. Shen Xiaohuan 沈嘯寰 and Wang Xingxian 王星賢. Beijing: Zhonghua.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Korea Studies Graduate SchoolInha UniversitySuwon-siSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations