Introduction to Part II: Ethics and Play

Chapter
Part of the Philosophy of Engineering and Technology book series (POET, volume 7)

Abstract

Every sort of human activity and invention is of interest to ethics. Normative theory is the part of ethics which tries to flesh out considerations and arguments about why one should act in a certain way rather than another. And such investigations encounter fresh challenges when faced with the plethora of computer gaming entities and events. Often and to a great extent, this is more broadly due to the fact that applying old regimes to new domains, or old tools to new machines, always requires some effort. But it may also be partly because there is something in the encountered phenomenon which is substantially new and not quite like anything we have faced before. In such cases, the consequences can still be anything from small scale tinkering to something like an intellectual revolution.

Keywords

Computer Game Virtual World Virtue Ethic Ethical Theory Normative Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Crisp, Roger, and Michael Slote (eds.). 1997. Virtue ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Kant, Immanuel. 1997. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Suggestions for Further Reading

  1. Balkin, Jack M., and Beth S. Noveck (eds.). 2006. The state of play: Law, games, and virtual worlds. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bartle, Richard. 2003. Designing virtual worlds. Indianapolis: New Riders.Google Scholar
  3. Borgmann, Albert. 1984. Technology and the character of contemporary life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chatfield, Tom. 2011. Fun Inc.: Why games are the 21st century’s most serious business. London: Virgin Books.Google Scholar
  5. Consalvo, Mia. 2005. Rule sets, cheating, and magic circles: Studying games and ethics. IRIE 3(06/2005): 7–12.Google Scholar
  6. Copier, Marinka. 2005. Connecting worlds: Fantasy role-playing games, ritual acts and the magic circle. In Proceedings of Digital Research Association (DiGRA) 2005 Conference: Changing Views-Worlds in Play,Canada, June 16–20, 2005. Vancouver: University of Vancouver.Google Scholar
  7. Dibbell, Julian. 1999. My tiny life: Crime and passion in a virtual world. New edition. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
  8. Fairfield, Joshua. 2009. The magic circle. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 11(4): 823–840.Google Scholar
  9. Floridi, Luciano. 2010. The philosophy of information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Huizinga, Johan. 1955. A study of play element in culture. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  11. Ihde, Don. 1990. Technology and the lifeworld. From garden to earth. Indiana: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. McIntyre, Alasdair. 1984. After virtue, 2nd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  13. Montola, Markus. 2005. Exploring the edge of the magic circle: Defining pervasive games. In Proceedings of Digital Arts and Culture, December 2–4, 2005, 1–4. Copenhagen: IT University in Copenhagen. http://users.tkk.fi/~mmontola/exploringtheedge.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2010.
  14. Muggleton, David. 2000. Inside subculture: The postmodern meaning of style. Illustrated edition. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  15. Sicart, Miguel. 2009. The ethics of computer games. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Spence, Edward. 2006. Ethics within reason: A neo-gewirthian approach. Maryland: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  17. Spence, Edward. 2007. Positive rights and the cosmopolitan community: A right-centred foundations for global ethics. Journal of Global Ethics 3(2): 181–202. July/August 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Verbeek, Peter Paul. 2005. What things do. Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Netherlands 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Norwegian National Research Ethical Committee for The Social Sciences and HumanitiesOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations