Craniopharyngioma: Comparison Between Supra-orbital Versus Endonasal Keyhole Approaches

  • Nancy McLaughlin
  • Amin B. Kassam
  • Daniel M. Prevedello
  • Domenico Solari
  • Kiarash Shahlaie
  • Nasrin Fatemi
  • Ricardo L. Carrau
  • Daniel F. Kelly
Chapter
Part of the Tumors of the Central Nervous System book series (TCNS, volume 8)

Abstract

Craniopharyngiomas represent one of the most challenging brain tumors to treat. In recent years, minimally invasive keyhole approaches have been increasingly used to remove these sellar, suprasellar and parasellar lesions. Of these approaches, the two most commonly used are the extended endonasal transsphenoidal route and the supraorbital eyebrow craniotomy. Although both approaches may be appropriate for a given patient, in many cases one route offers a better opportunity for safe and maximal tumor removal. Based on our combined experience using the endonasal and supra-orbital approaches for craniopharyngiomas, the endonasal route is preferred for removal of most retrochiasmal craniopharyngiomas and those lesions that are predominantly sellar in location. In contrast, those tumors that are predominantly prechiasmal or with prominent lateral extensions (a minority of craniopharyngiomas), the supra-orbital route is recommended. In some complex tumors with both prechiasmal and retrochiasmal extensions, either route may be appropriate. An additional key factor is surgeon experience with these keyhole approaches and conventional approaches. Compared to conventional larger craniotomies, the major limitation of both the endonasal and supraorbital approaches is a narrow surgical corridor. The endonasal approach has the added challenges of restricted lateral access, a greater need for endoscopy as well as a more demanding skull base repair. Herein, we review in this chapter the use of the supraorbital and endonasal approaches and summarize tumor and patient characteristics that help determine the optimal surgical route.

References

  1. Beretta F, Andaluz N, Chalaala C, Bernucci C, Salud L, Zuccarello M (2010) Image-guided anatomical and morphometric study of supraorbital and transorbital minicraniotomies to the sellar and perisellar regions: comparison with standard techniques. J Neurosurg 113:975–981Google Scholar
  2. Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Colao A, Del Basso De Caro M, Esposito F, Cirillo S, Lombardi G, de Divitiis E (2002) Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach: outcome analysis of 100 consecutive procedures. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 45:193–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cavallo LM, Messina A, Esposito F, de Divitiis O, Dal Fabbro M, de Divitiis E, Cappabianca P (2007) Skull base reconstruction in the extended endoscopic transsphenoidal approach for suprasellar lesions. J Neurosurg 107:713–720PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavallo LM, Prevedello D, Esposito F, Laws ER Jr, Dusick JR, Messina A, Jane JA Jr, Kelly DF, Cappabianca P (2008) The role of the endoscope in the transsphenoidal management of cystic lesions of the sellar region. Neurosurg Rev 31:55–64, discussion 64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cavallo LM, Prevedello DM, Solari D, Gardner PA, Esposito F, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Kassam AB, Cappabianca P (2009) Extended endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach for residual or recurrent craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg 111:578–589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chakrabarti I, Amar AP, Couldwell W, Weiss MH (2005) Long-term neurological, visual, and endocrine outcomes following transnasal resection of craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg 102:650–657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Couldwell WT, Weiss MH, Rabb C, Liu JK, Apfelbaum RI, Fukushima T (2004) Variations on the standard transsphenoidal approach to the sellar region, with emphasis on the extended approaches and parasellar approaches: surgical experience in 105 cases. Neurosurgery 55:539–547, discussion 547–550PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Czirjak S, Szeifert GT (2006) The role of the superciliary approach in the surgical management of intracranial neoplasms. Neurol Res 28:131–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Divitiis E, Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, de Divitiis O, Messina A (2007) Extended endoscopic transsphenoidal approach for extrasellar craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 61:219–227, discussion 228PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dusick JR, Esposito F, Kelly DF, Cohan P, DeSalles A, Becker DP, Martin NA (2005) The extended direct endonasal transsphenoidal approach for nonadenomatous suprasellar tumors. J Neurosurg 102:832–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dusick JR, Fatemi N, Mattozo C, McArthur D, Cohan P, Wang C, Swerdloff RS, Kelly DF (2008) Pituitary function after endonasal surgery for nonadenomatous parasellar tumors: Rathke’s cleft cysts, craniopharyngiomas, and meningiomas. Surg Neurol 70:482–490, discussion 490–491PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Esposito F, Dusick JR, Fatemi N, Kelly DF (2007) Graded repair of cranial base defects and cerebrospinal fluid leaks in transsphenoidal surgery. Neurosurgery 60:295–303, discussion 303–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fahlbusch R, Schott W (2002) Pterional surgery of meningiomas of the tuberculum sellae and planum sphenoidale: surgical results with special consideration of ophthalmological and endocrinological outcomes. J Neurosurg 96:235–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fahlbusch R, Honegger J, Paulus W, Huk W, Buchfelder M (1999) Surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas: experience with 168 patients. J Neurosurg 90:237–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fatemi N, Dusick JR, de Paiva Neto MA, Malkasian D, Kelly DF (2009) Endonasal versus supraorbital keyhole removal of craniopharyngiomas and tuberculum sellae meningiomas. Neurosurgery 64:269–284, discussion 284–286PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Figueiredo EG, Deshmukh V, Nakaji P, Deshmukh P, Crusius MU, Crawford N, Spetzler RF, Preul MC (2006) An anatomical evaluation of the mini- supraorbital approach and comparison with standard craniotomies. Neurosurgery 59:ONS212–ONS220, discussion ONS220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Frank G, Pasquini E, Doglietto F, Mazzatenta D, Sciarretta V, Farneti G, Calbucci F (2006) The endoscopic extended transsphenoidal approach for craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery 59:ONS75–ONS83, discussion ONS75–ONS83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Fries G, Perneczky A (1998) Endoscope-assisted brain surgery: part 2–analysis of 380 procedures. Neurosurgery 42:226–231, discussion 231–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gardner PA, Kassam AB, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Mintz AH, Grahovac S, Stefko S (2008) Outcomes following endoscopic, expanded endonasal resection of suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a case series. J Neurosurg 109:6–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garrè ML, Cama A (2007) Craniopharyngioma: modern concepts in pathogenesis and treatment. Curr Opin Pediatr 19(4):471–479Google Scholar
  21. Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL, Mataza JC, Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A (2006) A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap. Laryngoscope 116:1882–1886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoffman HJ, De Silva M, Humphreys RP, Drake JM, Smith ML, Blaser SI (1992) Aggressive surgical management of craniopharyngiomas in children. J Neurosurg 76:47–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Honegger J, Tatagiba M (2008) Craniopharyngioma surgery. Pituitary 11:361–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Honegger J, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R, Daubler B, Dorr HG (1992) Transsphenoidal microsurgery for craniopharyngioma. Surg Neurol 37:189–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kabil MS, Shahinian HK (2005) Application of the supraorbital endoscopic approach to tumors of the anterior cranial base. J Craniofac Surg 16:1070–1074, discussion 1075PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaptain GJ, Vincent DA, Sheehan JP, Laws ER Jr (2001) Transsphenoidal approaches for the extracapsular resection of midline suprasellar and anterior cranial base lesions. Neurosurgery 49:94–100, discussion 100–101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Karavitaki N, Wass JA (2008) Craniopharyngiomas. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 37:173–193, ix–xPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karavitaki N, Cudlip S, Adams CB, Wass JA (2006) Craniopharyngiomas. Endocr Rev 27:371–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kassam A, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Gardner P, Mintz A (2005a) Evolution of reconstructive techniques following endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches. Neurosurg Focus 19:E8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL (2005b) Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica. Neurosurg Focus 19:E3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kassam A, Thomas AJ, Snyderman C, Carrau R, Gardner P, Mintz A, Kanaan H, Horowitz M, Pollack IF (2007) Fully endoscopic expanded endonasal approach treating skull base lesions in pediatric patients. J Neurosurg 106:75–86PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kassam AB, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Mintz AH, Prevedello DM (2008a) Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum. J Neurosurg 108:715–728PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Thomas A, Gardner P, Mintz A, Snyderman C, Carrau R (2008b) Endoscopic endonasal pituitary transposition for a transdorsum sellae approach to the interpeduncular cistern. Neurosurgery 62:57–72, discussion 72–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kassam AB, Thomas A, Carrau RL, Snyderman CH, Vescan A, Prevedello D, Mintz A, Gardner P (2008c) Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap. Neurosurgery 63:ONS44–ONS52, discussion ONS 52–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Laws ER, Kanter AS, Jane JA Jr, Dumont AS (2005) Extended transsphenoidal approach. J Neurosurg 102:825–827, discussion 827–828PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Hofmann B, Fahlbusch R (2003) Limited benefit of intraoperative low-field magnetic resonance imaging in craniopharyngioma surgery. Neurosurgery 53:72–80, discussion 80–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perneczky A, Fries G (1998) Endoscope-assisted brain surgery: part 1-evolution, basic concept, and current technique. Neurosurgery 42:219–224, discussion 224–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Perneczky A, Muller-Forell W, van Lindert E, Fries G (1999) Keyhole concept in neurosurgey: with endoscopic-assisted microneurosurgery and case studies. Thieme, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Puget S, Garnett M, Wray A, Grill J, Habrand JL, Bodaert N, Zerah M, Bezerra M, Renier D, Pierre-Kahn A, Sainte-Rose C (2007) Pediatric craniopharyngiomas: classification and treatment according to the degree of hypothalamic involvement. J Neurosurg 106:3–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Reisch R, Perneczky A (2005) Ten-year experience with the supraorbital subfrontal approach through an eyebrow skin incision. Neurosurgery 57:242–255, discussion 242–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reisch R, Perneczky A, Filippi R (2003) Surgical technique of the supraorbital key-hole craniotomy. Surg Neurol 59:223–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Effenterre R, Boch AL (2002) Craniopharyngioma in adults and children: a study of 122 surgical cases. J Neurosurg 97:3–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Varlotto JM, Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Deutsch M (2002) External beam irradiation of craniopharyngiomas: long-term analysis of tumor control and morbidity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54:492–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weiss M, Sutton L, Marcial V, Fowble B, Packer R, Zimmerman R, Schut L, Bruce D, D’Angio G (1989) The role of radiation therapy in the management of childhood craniopharyngioma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 17:1313–1321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wiedemayer H, Sandalcioglu IE, Stolke D (2004) The supraorbital keyhole approach via an eyebrow incision for resection of tumors around the sella and the anterior skull base. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 47:221–225PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yasargil MG, Curcic M, Kis M, Siegenthaler G, Teddy PJ, Roth P (1990) Total removal of craniopharyngiomas. Approaches and long-term results in 144 patients. J Neurosurg 73:3–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Kassam AB, Gardner PA, Prevedello DM (2009) Minimally invasive endoscopic pericranial flap: a new method for endonasal skull base reconstruction. Laryngoscope 119:13–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy McLaughlin
    • 1
  • Amin B. Kassam
    • 2
  • Daniel M. Prevedello
    • 3
  • Domenico Solari
    • 1
  • Kiarash Shahlaie
    • 4
  • Nasrin Fatemi
    • 1
  • Ricardo L. Carrau
    • 5
  • Daniel F. Kelly
    • 1
  1. 1.Brain Tumor CenterJohn Wayne Cancer Institute at Saint John’s Health CenterSanta MonicaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Division of NeurosurgeryThe Ottawa Hospital Civic Campus at the University of OttawaOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Department of Neurological SurgeryWexner Medical Center at The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  4. 4.Department of NeurosurgeryUC DavisSacramentoUSA
  5. 5.Department of OtolaryngologyWexner Medical Center at The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations