Potato Evapotranspiration and Productivity as Affected by Drip Irrigation Frequency and Soil Matric Potential

Chapter

Abstract

Drip irrigation has been shown to be an effective method for achieving high potato yields. Soil matric potential (SMP) and irrigation frequencies are two important factors in optimizing potato production and tuber quality. This chapter reviews and discusses a case study of potato evapotranspiration (ET) and productivity in drip irrigated potato systems in the North China Plain in 2001 and 2002, as affected by SMP and irrigation frequency. The experiment in this case study included five treatments for SMP: F1 (−15 kPa), F2 (−25 kPa), F3 (−35 kPa), F4 (−45 kPa) and F5 (−55 kPa) and six treatments for irrigation frequency: N1 (daily irrigation), N2 (2 day intervals), N3 (3 day intervals), N4 (4 day intervals), N6 (6 day intervals) and N8 (8 day intervals). In general, ET was reduced at lower SMP, as F5 had the lowest ET (150 mm) among the five treatments, and F2 had the highest (208 mm). F1 experienced somewhat waterlogged conditions. Potato ET losses declined as SMP dropped from −25 to −55 kPa. Higher frequency of irrigation enhanced both potato tuber growth and water use efficiency (WUE). Reducing irrigation frequency from N1 to N8 resulted in significant yield reductions by 33.4% and 29.1% in the 2001 and 2002 growing seasons, respectively. Based on the results, the authors of this case study suggested a SMP threshold of −25 kPa, and an irrigation frequency of once a day for the as a target for drip irrigation management for potato production in the North China Plain.

Keywords

Tuber Yield Drip Irrigation Potato Production North China Plain Root Length Density 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Badr MA, Abou Hussein SD, El-Tohamy WA, Gruda N (2010) Efficiency of subsurface drip irrigation for potato production under different dry stress conditions. Gesunde Pflanzen 62:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Coelho EF, Or D (1999) Root distribution and water uptake patterns of corn under surface and subsurface drip irrigation. Plant Soil 206:123–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eldredge EP, Shock CC, Saunders LD (2003) Early and late harvest potato cultivar response to drip irrigation. In: Yada RY (ed) Potatoes – healthy food for humanity. International Society for Horticultural Science, Madison, pp 233–239Google Scholar
  4. Ferreira TC, Carr MKV (2002) Responses of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) to irrigation and nitrogen in a hot, dry climate – I. Water use. Field Crop Res 78:51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Huang J et al (2010) Dust aerosol effect on semi-arid climate over Northwest China detected from A-Train satellite measurements. Atmos Chem Phys 10:6863–6872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jensen CR et al (2010) Deficit irrigation based on drought tolerance and root signalling in potatoes and tomatoes. Agric Water Manage 98:403–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kang YH, Wang FX, Liu HJ, Yuan BZ (2004) Potato evapotranspiration and yield under different drip irrigation regime. Irrig Sci 23:133–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kashyap PS, Panda RK (2001) Evaluation of evapotranspiration estimation methods and development of crop-coefficients for potato crop in a sub-humid region. Agric Water Manage 50:9–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kashyap PS, Panda RK (2003) Effect of irrigation scheduling on potato crop parameters under water stressed conditions. Agric Water Manage 59:49–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lahlou O, Ledent JF (2005) Root mass and depth, stolons and roots formed on stolons in four cultivars of potato under water stress. Eur J Agron 22:159–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lynch DR, Tai GCC (1989) Yield and yield component response of 8 potato genotypes to water-stress. Crop Sci 29:1207–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Marutani M, Cruz F (1989) Influence of supplemental irrigation on development of potatoes in the tropics. Hortscience 24:920–923Google Scholar
  13. Plaut Z, Carmi A, Grava A (1996) Cotton root and shoot responses to subsurface drip irrigation and partial wetting of the upper soil profile. Irrig Sci 16:103–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Saeed H, Grove IG, Kettlewell PS, Hall NW (2008) Potential of partial rootzone drying as an alternative irrigation technique for potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). Ann Appl Biol 152:71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shock CC, Wang FX (2011) Soil water tension, a powerful measurement for productivity and stewardship. Hortscience 46:178–185Google Scholar
  16. Timlin D, Fleisher D, Kim SH, Reddy V, Baker J (2007) Evapotranspiration measurement in controlled environment chambers: a comparison between time domain reflectometry and accumulation of condensate from cooling coils. Agron J 99:166–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wang FX, Kang YH, Liu SP (2006) Effects of drip irrigation frequency on soil wetting pattern and potato growth in North China Plain. Agric Water Manage 79:248–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang FX, Kang YH, Liu SP, Hou XY (2007) Effects of soil matric potential on potato growth under drip irrigation in the North China Plain. Agric Water Manage 88:34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang Q, Zhang E, Li F, Li F (2008) Runoff efficiency and the technique of microwater harvesting with ridges and furrows for potato production in semi-arid areas. Waste Resour Manage 22:1431–1443Google Scholar
  20. Wilson CR, Pemberton BM, Ransom LM (2001) The effect of irrigation strategies during tuber initiation on marketable yield and development of common scab disease of potato in Russet Burbank in Tasmania. Potato Res 44:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wu P-T (2010) Strategic considerations for Chinese agricultural water and food safety: issues, challenges and suggestions. Afr J Biotechnol 9:5251–5261Google Scholar
  22. Yuan BZ, Nishiyama S, Kang YH (2003) Effects of different irrigation regimes on the growth and yield of drip-irrigated potato. Agric Water Manage 63:153–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang J, Sun J, Duan A, Wang J, Shen X, Liu X (2007) Effects of different planting pattern on water use and yield performance of winter wheat in the Huang-Huai-Hai plain of China. Agric Water Manage 92:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Agricultural Water Research in ChinaChina Agricultural UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Southern Regional Research CenterUSDA-ARSNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations