Neighborhood and Window Operations

  • Valliappa Lakshmanan
Chapter
Part of the Geotechnologies and the Environment book series (GEOTECH, volume 6)

Abstract

When processing spatial grids, it is often necessary to preprocess them to improve the results of later stages. Preprocessing may be to remove noise, to smooth over abrupt variations, to identify edges, or to fill gaps. In this chapter, we discuss neighborhood and window operations that may be used for these purposes. Smoothing can be carried out using a variety of windowing operations: the boxcar, Gaussian, and median filters are most commonly used. Because the boxcar filter is subject to ringing artifacts, we recommend the use of either the Gaussian filter (to mitigate abrupt changes) or the median filter (to mitigate the impact of noise). A matched filter may be used to extract specific shapes from a spatial grid but requires that you know the exact shape and orientation beforehand. Directional smoothing is commonly achieved using a filter bank of oriented filters. Separability is a concern, however. We discuss a couple of edge filtering techniques and point out the use of median filters in speckle removal. Morphological operations for dilation and erosion are described and the use of combinations of morphological operations for denoising and gap filling described. Finally, we discuss skeletonization and thinning algorithms.

Keywords

Median Filter Filter Bank Matched Filter Spatial Grid Speckle Noise 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Canny J (1986) A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 8:679–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Charalampidis D (2009) Efficient directional Gaussian smoothers. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens Lett 6:383–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooley JW, Tukey JW (1965) An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex fourier series. Math Comput 19:297–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Coppin PR, Bauer ME (1996) Digital change detection in forest ecosystems with remote sensing imagery. Remote Sens Rev 13(3–4):207–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frigo M, Johnson S (1998) FFTW: an adaptive software architecture for the FFT. In: International conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, Seattle. IEEE Service Center, pp 1381–1384Google Scholar
  6. Hilditch C (1969) Linear skeletons from square cupboards. In: Meltzer B, Michie D (eds) Machine intelligence 4. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 403–420Google Scholar
  7. Kitamoto A (2002) Spatio-temporal data mining for typhoon image collection. J Intell Inf Syst 19:25–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lakshmanan V (2004) A separable filter for directional smoothing. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 1(3):192–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lakshmanan V, Hondl K, Rabin R (2009) An efficient, general-purpose technique for identifying storm cells in geospatial images. J Ocean Atmos Tech 26(3):523–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pitas I, Venetsanopoulos N (1986) Edge detectors based on non-linear filters. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 8(4):538–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Press W, Flannery B, Teukolsky S, Vetterling W (1988) Numerical recipes in C, the art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. Scambos TA, Dutkiewicz MJ, Wilson JC, Bindschadler RA (1992) Application of image cross-correlation to the measurement of glacier velocity using satellite image data. Remote Sens Environ 42(3):177–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wolfson MM, Forman BE, Hallowell RG, Moore MP (1999) The growth and decay storm tracker. In: 8th conference on aviation, Dallas. American Meteorological Society, pp 58–62Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valliappa Lakshmanan
    • 1
  1. 1.National Weather CenterUniversity of OklahomaNormanUSA

Personalised recommendations