Sexual Harassment: “Is It Just Me or Are You Hot?”

Part of the International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life book series (IHQL)

Abstract

This chapter reviews what constitutes sexual harassment, its prevalence in the US workforce, its potential causes, and the detrimental effects it has on victims, victims’ work groups, and their organizations as a whole. Situational and individual predictors of sexual harassment are explored. Also included is a review of how employee rights and quality of work life, as well the organizational bottom line, are jeopardized by the occurrence of sexual harassment. Ultimately, the authors conclude that sexual harassment is a significant problem facing organizations today. Even the most carefully developed, well-intentioned preventative measures are unlikely to completely prevent it. Programs for preventing sexual harassment are discussed along with recommendations for stopping sexual harassment, restoring employee quality of work life, and minimizing legal exposure.

References

  1. Barrett v. Omaha National Bank, 726 F.2d 424, 33 EPD 34,132. (1984).Google Scholar
  2. Bastian, L. D., Lancaster, A. R., & Reyest, H. E. (1996). Department of Defense 1995 sexual harassment survey (Publication No. 96-014). Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.Google Scholar
  3. Bell, M. P., Quick, J. C., & Cycyota, C. S. (2002). Assessment and prevention of sexual harassment of employees: An applied guide to creating healthy organizations. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 10(1–2), 160–167. Retrieved from http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0965–075X
  4. Berdahl, J. L. (2007). The sexual harassment of uppity women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 425–437. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berdahl, J. L., & Aquino, K. (2009). Sexual behavior at work: Fun or folly? Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 34–47. doi:10.1037/a0012981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergman, M. E., Langhout, R. D., Palmieri, P. A., Cortina, L. M., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2002). The (un)reasonableness of reporting: Antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 230–242. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02156.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bisom-Rapp, S. (2001). An ounce of prevention is a poor substitute for a pound of cure: Confronting the developing jurisprudence of education and prevention in employment discrimination law. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 22(1). Retrieved from http://www.bjell.org/
  8. Boland, M. L. (2005). Sexual harassment in the workplace. Naperville, IL: Sphinx Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, T. D. (1993). When counseling is not enough: The ninth circuit requires employers to discipline sexual harassers. Washington University Law Quarterly, 71, 901–919.Google Scholar
  10. Burlington Industries v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742. (1988).Google Scholar
  11. Chan, D. K.-S., Lam, C. B., Chow, S. Y., & Cheung, S. F. (2008). Examining the job-related, psychological, and physical outcomes of workplace sexual harassment: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 362–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Civil Rights Act of 1991. (1991). P.L. 102–166, 105 stat. 1071.Google Scholar
  13. Collinsworth, L. L., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Dragow, F. (2009). In harm’s way: Factors related to psycho­logical distress following sexual harassment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(4), 475–490. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01525.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de Haas, S., Timmerman, G., & Höing, M. (2009). Sexual harassment and health among male and female police officers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(4), 390–401. doi:10.1037/a0017046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Donovan, M. A., & Drasgow, F. (1999). Do men’s and women’s experience of sexual harassment differ? An examination of the differential test functioning of the sexual experiences questionnaire. Military Psychology, 11(3), 265–282. doi:10.1207/s15327876mp1103_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dubois, C. L. Z., Knapp, D. E., Faley, R. H., & Kustis, G. A. (1998). An empirical examination of same- and other-gender sexual harassment in the workplace. Sex Roles, 39(9–10), 731–749. doi:10.1023/A:1018860101629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 3–22. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elkins, T. J., Phillips, J. S., & Ward, S. G. (2008). Organizational sexual harassment investigations: Observers’ perceptions of fairness. Journal of Managerial Issues, 20(1), 88–108. http://www.pittstate.edu/department/economics/journal-of-managerial-issues/ Google Scholar
  19. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (EEOC) (1980). Guidelines on discrimination because of sex. Federal Register, 45, 746–777.Google Scholar
  20. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (EEOC) (1990a). Policy guidance on current issues of sexual harassment (N-915-050). Retrieved March 30, 2012, from http://eeoc.gov/policy/docs/currentissues.html
  21. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (EEOC) (1990b). Policy guidance on employer liability under Title VII for sexual favoritism (N-915.048). Retrieved March 30, 2012, from http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/sexualfavor.html
  22. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (EEOC) (1994). Enforcement guidance on Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc (92-1168 slip op). Retrieved March 30, 2012, from http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/harris.html
  23. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (EEOC) (1996, April). EEOC chairman comments on lawsuit against Mitsubishi. Retrieved March 30, 2012, from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/4-22-96.cfm
  24. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (EEOC) (1999). Enforcement guidance: Vicarious employer liability for unlawful harassment by supervisors (915.002). Retrieved March 30, 2012, from http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/harassment.html
  25. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (EEOC) (2009). Cheesecake factory settles EEOC suit in case of severe same-sex sexual harassment. Retrieved March 30, 2012, from: http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/11-10-09.cfm
  26. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (EEOC) (2010). Sexual harassment charges EEOC & FEPAs combined: FY 1997–FY 2010. Retrieved March 30, 2012, from: http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/sexual_harassment.cfm
  27. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission & Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc., 117 S. Ct. 660. (1997).Google Scholar
  28. Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775. (1998).Google Scholar
  29. Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 578–589. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.4.578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand, M. J., & Drasgow, F. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 425–445. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1704_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fitzgerald, L. F., Swan, S., & Fischer, K. (1995). Why didn’t she just report him? The psychological and legal implications of women’s responses to sexual harassment. The Journal of Social Issues, 51(1), 117–138. Retrieved from http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0022-4537
  32. Foote, W. E., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2005). Evaluating sexual harassment: Psychological, social, and legal considerations in forensic examinations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10827-000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Franklin, E. D. (1999). Maneuvering through the labyrinth: The employer’s paradox in responding to hostile environment sexual harassment – A proposed way out. Fordham Law Review, 67(4), 1517–1608. Retrieved from http://fordhamlawreview.org Google Scholar
  34. Gelfand, M. J., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment: A confirmatory factor analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47, 164–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gesaman, K. (2010, January 13). Abuse of power. Newsweek. Retrieved from http://www.newsweek.com
  36. Glomb, T. M., Munson, L. J., Hulin, C. L., Bergman, M. E., & Drasgow, F. (1999). Structural equation models of sexual harassment: Longitudinal explorations and cross-sectional generalizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 14–28. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Glomb, T. M., Richman, W. L., Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., Schneider, K. T., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Ambient sexual harassment: An integrated model of antecedents and consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71(3), 309–328. doi:10.1006/obhd.1997.2728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gruber, J. E. (1998). The impact of male work environments and organizational policies on women’s experiences of sexual harassment. Gender and Society, 12, 301–320. doi:10.1177/0891243298012003004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace: The impact of sexual behavior and harassment on women, men, and organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  40. Gutek, B. A., Cohen, A., & Konrad, A. (1990). Predicting social-sexual behavior at work: A contact hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 33(3), 560–577. doi:10.2307/256581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gutek, B. A., O’Connor, M. A., Melançon, R., Stockdale, M. S., Geer, T. M., & Done, R. S. (1999). The utility of the reasonable woman legal standard in hostile environment sexual harassment cases: A multimethod, multistudy examination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(3), 596–629. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.5.3.596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17. (1993).Google Scholar
  43. Hewlett, S. A., Peraino, K., Sherbin, L., & Sumberg, K. (2011, January 12). The sponsor effect: Breaking through the last glass ceiling. The Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/
  44. Ilies, R., Hauserman, N., Schwochau, S., & Stibal, J. (2003). Reported incidence rates of work-related sexual harassment in the United States: Using meta-analysis to explain reported rate disparities. Personnel Psychology, 56(3), 607–631. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00752.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  46. Kearney, L. K., Rochlen, A. B., & King, E. B. (2004). Male gender role conflict, sexual harassment tolerance, and the efficacy of a psychoeducative training program. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 5(1), 72–82. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.5.1.72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kenneth, R. J. (2004). ‘Zero tolerance’ for sexual harassment by supervisors in the workplace: Employers don’t have a real choice. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 4, 57–64. doi:10.1300/J158v04n01_04.Google Scholar
  48. Lim, S., & Cortina, L. M. (2005). Interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace: The interface and impact of general incivility and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 483–496. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  50. MacKinnon, C. A. (1997). Sexual harassment of working women. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Magley, V. J., Hulin, C. L., Fitzgerald, L. F., & DeNardo, M. (1999). Outcomes of self-labeling sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 390–402. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mattioli, D. (2010, March 23). Recession spurs harassment claims by men. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com
  53. McCann, D. F. (2000). Supervisory sexual harassment and employer liability: The third circuit sheds light on vicarious liability and affirmative defenses. Villanova Law Review, 45(4), 767–792. http://www.law.villanova.edu/Academics/Journals/Law%20Review.aspx
  54. Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57. (1986).Google Scholar
  55. Miller v. Department of Corrections, 36 Cal 4th 446. (2005).Google Scholar
  56. Mitchell, M. S., Koen, C. M., & Crow, S. M. (2008). Harassment: It’s not (all) about sex! Part I: The evolving legal environment. The Health Care Manager, 27(1), 13–22. Retrieved from http://journals.lww.com/healthcaremanagerjournal
  57. Mueller, C. W., De Coster, S., & Estes, S. B. (2001). Sexual harassment in the workplace: Unanticipated consequences of modern social control in organizations. Work and Occupations, 28(4), 411–446. doi:10.1177/0730888401028004003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Munson, L., Miner, A., & Hulin, C. (2001). Labeling sexual harassment in the military: An extension and replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 293–303. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nelson, C. G., Halpert, J. A., & Cellar, D. F. (2007). Organizational responses for preventing and stopping sexual harassment: Effective deterrents of continued endurance. Sex Roles, 56, 811–822. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9239-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Neuser, D. J. (2005). How to Conduct Effective Internal Investigations of Workplace Matters. Employee Relations Law Journal, 31(1), 67–89.Google Scholar
  61. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 523 US 75. (1998).Google Scholar
  62. O’Neill, C., & Boyle, S. (2011). Leadership challenges for women at work. Chief Learning Officer, 10(6), 76–78. Retrieved from http://clomedia.com/
  63. Perry, E. L., Kulik, C. T., & Bourhis, A. C. (2004). The reasonable woman standard: Effects on sexual harassment court decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 28(1), 9–27. doi:10.1023/B:LAHU.0000015001.07732.8e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Perry, E. L., Kulik, C. T., & Schmidtke, J. M. (1998). Individual differences in the effectiveness of sexual harassment awareness training. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(8), 698–723. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01727.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Petrocelli, W., & Repa, B. K. (2000). Sexual harassment on the job: What it is and how to stop it. Berkeley, CA: Nolo Press.Google Scholar
  66. Pryor, J. B. (1987). Sexual harassment proclivities in men. Sex Roles, 17(5–6), 269–290. doi:10.1007/BF00288453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pryor, J. B., Giedd, J. L., & Williams, K. B. (1995). A social psychological model for predicting sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51(1), 69–84. http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0022-4537 Google Scholar
  68. Pryor, J. B., LaVite, C. M., & Stoller, L. M. (1993). A social psychological analysis of sexual harassment: The person/situation interaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42(1), 68–83. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1993.1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Ragins, B. R., Townsend, B., & Mattis, M. (1998). Gender gap in the executive suite: CEOs and female executives report on breaking the glass ceiling. The Academy of Management Executive, 12(1), 28–42. doi:10.5465/AME.1998.254976.Google Scholar
  70. Raver, J. L., & Gelfand, M. J. (2005). Beyond the individual team: Linking sexual harassment, team process and team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 387–400. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reese, L. A., & Lindenberg, K. E. (2004). Employee satisfaction with sexual harassment policies: The training connection. Public Personnel Management, 33(1), 99–119. Retrieved from http://www.ipma-hr.org/node/21487
  72. Richman-Hirsch, W. L., & Glomb, T. M. (2002). Are men affected by the sexual harassment of women? Effects of ambient sexual harassment on men. In J. M. Brett & F. Drasgow (Eds.), The psychology of work: Theoretically based empirical research (pp. 121–140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  73. Robinson, R. K., & Allen, B. M. (1993). Sexual harassment in the workplace: A review of the legal rights and responsibilities of all parties. Public Personnel Management 22(1), 123–135. Retrieved from http://www.ipma-hr.org/node/21487
  74. Rudman, L. A., Borgida, E., & Robertson, B. A. (1995). Suffering in silence: Procedural justice versus gender socialization issues in university sexual harassment grievance procedures. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 519–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sbraga, T. P., & O’Donohue, W. (2000). Sexual harassment. Annual Review of Sex Research, 11, 258–285. Retrieved from http://www.sexscience.org/
  76. Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  77. Schneider, K. T., Swan, S., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Job-related and psychological effects of sexual harassment in the workplace: Empirical evidence from two organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 401–415. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stockdale, M. S., & Bhattacharya, G. (2009). Sexual harassment and the glass ceiling. In M. Barreto & M. K. Ryan (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality (pp. 171–199). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11863–008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Street, A. E., Gradus, J. L., Stafford, J., & Kelly, K. (2007). Gender differences in experiences of sexual harassment: Data from a male-dominated environment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(3), 464–474. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.3.464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Timmerman, G., & Bajema, C. (2000). The impact of organizational culture on perceptions and experiences of sexual harassment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(2), 188–205. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1999.1741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Uggen, C., & Blackstone, A. (2004). Sexual harassment as a gendered expression of power. American Sociological Review, 69, 64–92. doi:10.1177/000312240406900105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. U.S. Department of Labor, Women’s Bureau. (2009). Quick stats on women workers, 2009. Retrieved March 30, 2012, from http://www.dol.gov/wb/stats/main.htm
  83. U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1981). Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: Is it a problem? Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
  84. Wayte, T., Samra, J., Rubbennolt, J. K., Heuer, L., & Koch, W. J. (2002). Taking psychology and law into the twenty-first century. In J. R. P. Ogloff (Ed.), Taking psychology and law into the twenty-first century (pp. 323–369). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  85. White, L. A., Nord, R. D., Mael, F. A., & Young, M. C. (1993). The assessment of background and life experiences (ABLE). In T. Trent & J. H. Laurence (Eds.), Adaptability screening for the armed forces. Washington, DC: Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management and Personnel).Google Scholar
  86. Willert, S. J. (1998). Sexual harassment: Defining employer’s rights. For the Defense, 40(11), 8–11.Google Scholar
  87. Willness, C. R., Steel, P., & Lee, K. (2007). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of workplace sexual harassment. Personnel Psychology, 60(1), 127–162. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00067.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wright, C. V., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2009). Correlates of joining a sexual harassment class action. Law and Human Behavior, 33(4), 265–282. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9156-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zabkowicz v. West Bend Co., 589 F. Supp. 780, 35 EPD 34,766. (1984).Google Scholar
  90. Zugelder, M. T., Champagne, P. J., & Maurer, S. D. (2006). An affirmative defense to sexual harassment by managers and supervisors: Analyzing employer liability and protecting employee rights in the United States. Employee Responsibilities and Rights, 18(2), 111–122. doi:10.1007/s10672-006-9008-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aclarity Partners, Ltd.PortlandUSA
  2. 2.Business Psychology DepartmentThe Chicago School of Professional PsychologyChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations