Challenging Opportunities: Integrating ICT in School Science Education

Chapter

Abstract

Recent advances in Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) offer significant opportunities to engage students in science education that is relevant to their everyday lives. Northern Australia is one of the most sparsely settled regions of the world with a population density of 0.3 people per square kilometre. In this region lies the Northern Territory, where 47% of students live in remote areas. Access to resources, including qualified science teachers, science centres and scientists, that are freely available to their student counterparts in other parts of Australia and developed nations, are not readily available. Thus, ICT has the potential to play a fundamental role in science education for remote northern Australia. While northern Australia is relatively intact ecologically and its biodiversity richness is internationally significant, this ecological value has been largely unrecognised and absent in school education. In response, the Tropical Savannas Cooperative Research Centre, in partnership with the Northern Territory Department of Education and Training, has developed a range of online, integrated resources that focus on valuing and sustaining the northern environments of Australia. EnviroNorth: Living Sustainably in Australia’s Savannas (http://environorth.org.au) helps bridge the identified gap that exists between the scientific research conducted in northern Australia and science education that is taught in schools. The design-based research that underpins EnviroNorth provides a relevant context for learning in these regions. It also provides a window for engaging learning opportunities in other parts of Australia and the rest of the world. However, despite schools throughout northern Australia embracing ICT, its integration into science education poses a challenge for many teachers. This chapter discusses the affordances of adopted educational technologies in designing and developing these teaching and learning resources, along with the enablers and barriers to adopting ICT and these resources in schools.

References

  1. Aikenhead, G. (2006). Science education for everyday life. New York: Teachers’ College Press.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2010). The shape of the Australian curriculum: Science. Retrieved August 18, 2010, from http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/_resources/Australian_Curriculum_-_Science.pdf
  3. Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage. (2005). Educating for a sustainable future. Carlton South: Curriculum Corporation.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, H. J., & Ravitz, J. (1999). The influence of computer and internet use on teacher’s pedagogical practices and perceptions. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 356–384.Google Scholar
  5. Becta. (2008). Analysis of emerging trends affecting the use of technology in education. Retrieved August 25, 2010, from http://emergingtechnologies.becta.org.uk/index.php?section=etr&rid=14522Google Scholar
  6. Blythe, T. (1998). The teaching for understanding guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school committee on developments in the science of learning. Retrieved October 28, 2007, from http://www.newhorizons.org/neuro/neu_review_bransford.htm
  8. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Conole, G., & Fill, K. (2005). A learning design toolkit to create pedagogically effective learning activities. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 8(8), 1–16.Google Scholar
  10. Crawford, C. (2003). The art of interactive design: A euphonious and illuminating guide to building successful software. San Francisco: No Starch Press.Google Scholar
  11. Department of Education and Training. (2008). Annual report 2008–2009. Darwin: Northern Territory Government Printers.Google Scholar
  12. Dyer, R., Jacklyn, P., Partridge, I., Russell-Smith, J., & Williams, D. (2001). Savanna burning. Darwin: Tropical Savannas CRC.Google Scholar
  13. Ertmer, P. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fensham, P. (2006). Student interest in science: The problem, possible solutions, and constraints. Plenary address to the ACER Research Conference 2006, “Boosting science learning – What will it take?” Canberra.Google Scholar
  15. Futurelab. (2004). Designing educational technologies with users. Retrieved September 30, 2009, from http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/publications-reports-articles/handbooks/Handbook196
  16. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Garnett, S., Woinarski, J., Gerritsen, R., & Duff, G. (2008). Future options for North Australia. Darwin: Uniprint.Google Scholar
  18. Goodrum, D., & Rennie, L. (2007). Australian School Science Education: National Action Plan 2008–2012: Vols. 1 & 2. The National Action Plan. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.Google Scholar
  19. Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools: A research report, Retrieved March 20, 2004, from http://www.detya.gov.au/schools/publications/index.htm
  20. Haughey, M., & Muirhead, B. (2005). The pedagogical and multimedia designs of learning objects for schools. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 21(4), 470–490.Google Scholar
  21. Hedberg, J. G. (2007). Searching for disruptive pedagogies: Matching pedagogies to the technologies. Curriculum Leadership, 5(12). Retrieved August 23, 2010, from http://www.curriculum.edu.au/verve/_resources/Hedberg_Paper.pdf
  22. Hedberg, J., & Harper, B. (1997). Creating motivating interactive learning environments. Keynote address at EDMEDIA, Calgary.Google Scholar
  23. Hennessey, S., Wishart, J., Whitelock, D., Deaney, R., Brawn, R., la Velle, L., McFarlane, A., Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical approaches for technology-integrated science teaching. Computers in Education, 48, 137–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic learning environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19(1), 59–71.Google Scholar
  25. Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Herrington, A. (2007). Authentic learning on the web: Guidelines for course design. Retrieved October 12, 2009, from http://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/48
  26. Hutley, L. B., & Setterfield, S. A. (2007). Savannas. In S. E. Jørgensen (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of ecology. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  27. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as Mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking. Columbus: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  28. Ma, Y., & Harmon, S. (2009). A case study of design-based research for creating a vision prototype of a technology-based innovative learning environment. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 20(1), 75–93.Google Scholar
  29. McLoughlin, C., & Oliver, R. (2000). Designing learning environments for cultural inclusivity: A case study of indigenous online learning at tertiary level. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 58–72.Google Scholar
  30. Oliver, R., & Herrington, J. (2001). Teaching and learning online: A beginner’s guide to e-learning and e-teaching in higher education. Perth: Edith Cowan University.Google Scholar
  31. Papadouris, N., Constantinos, P., & Constantinou, T. K. (2009). A methodology for integrating computer-based learning tools in science curricula. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(4), 521–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramsey, G., Hill, G., Bin-Sallik, M., Falk, I., Grady, N., Landrigan, M., & Watterston, W. (2003). Future directions for secondary education in the Northern Territory. Darwin: Department of Employment, Education and Training. Retrieved October 14, 2009, from http://www.det.nt.gov.au/about-us/publications/secondary-education-review
  33. Rodriguez, A. J., & Zozakiewicz, C. (2010). Facilitating the integration of multiple literacies through science education and learning technologies. In A. J. Rodriguez (Ed.), Science education as a pathway to teaching language literacy (pp. 23–45). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Sims, R. (2005). Beyond instructional design: Making learning design a reality. Journal of Learning Design, 1(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
  35. Statistics Singapore. (2009). Statistics Singapore. Retrieved October 13, 2009, from http://www.singstat.gov.sg/stats/keyind.html
  36. Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  37. Whitehead, P., Russell-Smith, J., & Woinarski, J. C. Z. (2005). Fire, landscape heterogeneity and wildlife management in Australia’s tropical savannas: Introduction and overview. Wildlife Research, 32, 369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Woinarski, J. C. Z., Mackey, B., Nix, B., & Trail, B. (2007). The nature of Northern Australia: Its natural values, ecological processes and future prospects. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute for Environment and LivelihoodsCharles Darwin UniversityDarwinAustralia
  2. 2.Northern Territory Department of Education and Training, Curriculum Teaching and Phases of LearningDarwinAustralia
  3. 3.Northern Territory Department of Education and TrainingDarwinAustralia

Personalised recommendations