Activity and Event Related Biometrics

Chapter
Part of the The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology book series (ELTE, volume 11)

Abstract

In this chapter a brief overview on the field of biometrics will be given and the current advances in the field of behavioural biometrics will be discussed. We explain the need for the transition from the classic biometrics to the new concept of activity related biometrics (and specifically to the event triggered ones). We claim that the recognition capacity of various activities varies, according to the type of the activity and thus, we form an initial categorization to normal and abnormal activities. The collection of these biometric data is of high importance and thus, we suggest a dual approach to the anthropometrical tracking of the user, followed by a method for the intact extraction of invariant biometric features from the collected temporal data. The ethical issues risen from the collecting of personal data are thoroughly discussed. Possible applications and innovative usages of such behavioral biometrics are explored and presented in the current work.

Keywords

Activity Recognition Biometric System Human Activity Recognition Biometric Characteristic Biometric Information 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Abbreviations

APF

Annealed particle filter

ATM

Automatic teller machine

CIT

Circular integration radon transform

DNA

Deoxyribo nucleic acid

GMM

Gaussian mixture model

HHMM

Hierarchical hidden Markov models

HMM

Hidden Markov model

MHI

Motion history image

PF

Particle filter

RIT

Radial integration radon transform

References

  1. Bao, L., and S.S. Intille. 2004. Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data, 1–17. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Bobick, A., and J. Davis. 2001. The recognition of human movement using temporal templates. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 23(3): 257–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bobick, A.F., and A.Y. Johnson. 2001. Gait recognition using static, activity-specific parameters. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1: 423–430.Google Scholar
  4. Boulgouris, N., and Z. Chi. 2007. Gait recognition using radon transform and linear discriminant analysis. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 16(3): 731–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deutscher, J., A. Blake, and I. Reid. 2000. Articulated body motion capture by annealed particle filtering, vol. 2. IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  6. Freund, Y., and R.E. Schapire. 1999. A short introduction to boosting. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  7. Fusier, F., V. Valentin, F. Bremond, and M. Thonnat. 2007. Video understanding for complex activity recognition. Machine Vision and Applications Journal 18: 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goetz, C. 1998. Parkinson’s disease and movement disorders. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 280: 1796–1797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gomez, G., and E.F. Morales. 2002. Automatic feature construction and a simple rule induction algorithm for skin detection. In Proceedings of the ICML Workshop on Machine Learning in Computer Vision, 31–38.Google Scholar
  10. Ioannidis, D., D. Tzovaras, I.G. Damousis, S. Argyropoulos, and K. Moustakas. 2007. Gait recognition using compact feature extraction transforms and depth information. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 2(3): 623–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jain, A.K., S.C. Dass, and K. Nandakumar. 2004a. Soft biometric traits for personal recognition systems. In Proceedings of International Conference on Biometric Authentication, Hong Kong, 731–738.Google Scholar
  12. Jain, A.K., A. Ross, and S. Prabhakar. 2004b. An introduction to biometric recognition. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 14(1): 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Junker, H., P. Lukowicz, and G. Tröster. 2004. User activity related data sets for context recognition. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Benchmarks and a database for context recognition held in conjunction with Pervasive, IEEE Computer Society. Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  14. Kale, A., N. Cuntoor, and R. Chellappa. 2002. A framework for activity-specific human identification. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 4: IV3660–IV3663.Google Scholar
  15. Kawanaka, D., T. Okatani, and K. Deguchi. 2006. HHMM based recognition of human activity. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems 89(7): 2180–2185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lester, J., T. Choudhury, N. Kern, G. Borriello, and B. Hannaford. 2005. A hybrid discriminative/generative approach for modeling human activities. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 766–772.Google Scholar
  17. Matey, J., O. Naroditsky, K. Hanna, R. Kolczynski, D. LoIacono, S. Mangru, M. Tinker, T. Zappia, and W. Zhao. 2006. Iris on the move: Acquisition of images for iris recognition in less constrained environments. Proceedings of the IEEE 94(11): 1936–1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Park, F. 1994. Computational aspects of the product-of-exponentials formula for robot kinematics. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 39(3): 643–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Patterson, D.J., L. Liao, K. Gajos, M. Collier, N. Livic, K. Olson, S. Wang, D. Fox, and H. Kautz. 2004. Opportunity knocks: A system to provide cognitive assistance with transportation services. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp), 433–450. Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Poynton, C. 1997. Frequently asked questions about color, 1–24. http://www.poynton.com/PDFs/ColorFAQ.pdf
  21. Rabiner, L. 1990. A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Readings in Speech Recognition 53(3): 267–296.Google Scholar
  22. Ramesh, D., and P. Meer. 2000. Real-time tracking of non-rigid objects using mean shift. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2: 142–149.Google Scholar
  23. Scharstein, D., and R. Szeliski. 2002. A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms. International Journal of Computer Vision 47: 7–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Skarbek, W., and A. Koschan. 1994. Colour image segmentation-a survey. Berlin: Technische Universitaet.Google Scholar
  25. Tapia, E.M., S.S. Intille, and K. Larson. 2004. Activity recognition in the home using simple and ubiquitous sensors. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Viola, P., and M. Jones. 2001. Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1: I511–I518.Google Scholar
  27. Wang, L., and X. Geng. 2009. Game playing tactic as a behavioral biometric for human identification, chapter 18, 385–413. Global, IGI.Google Scholar
  28. Welch, G., and G. Bishop. 1995. An introduction to the Kalman filter. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  29. Wickins, J. 2007. The ethics of biometrics: The risk of social exclusion from the widespread use of electronic identification. Science and Engineering Ethics 13(1): 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wu, S., and Y. Li. 2009. Flexible signature descriptions for adaptive motion trajectory representation, perception and recognition. Pattern Recognition 42(1): 194–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yampolskiy, R.V., and V. Govindaraju. 2009. Strategy-based behavioural biometrics: A novel approach to automated identification. International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology 35(1): 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zouba, N., F. Bremond, M. Thonnat, and V.T. Vu. 2007. Multi-sensors analysis for everyday activity monitoring. In 4th International Conference: Sciences of Electronic, Technologies of Information and Telecommunications (SETIT2007), Tunis, Tunisia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Electronic EngineeringImperial College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Informatics and Telematics InstituteThermi-ThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations