Structural Invariants, Structural Kinds, Structural Laws

Chapter
Part of the The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective book series (PSEP, volume 3)

Abstract

The paper has three parts. In the first part ExtOSR, an extended version of Ontic Structural Realism, will be introduced. ExtOSR considers structural properties as ontological primitives, where structural properties are understood as comprising both relational and structurally derived intrinsic properties or structure invariants. It is argued that ExtOSR is best suited to accommodate gauge symmetry invariants and zero value properties. In the second part, ExtOSR will be given a Humean shape by considering structures as categorical and global. It will be laid out how such structures serve to reconstruct non-essential structural kinds and laws. In the third part Humean structural realism will be defended against the threat of quidditism.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Peter M. Ainsworth, “What is ontic structural realism?”, in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 41, 2010, pp. 50–57.Google Scholar
  2. Yuri Balashov, “Zero-value physical quantities”, in: Synthese 119, 1999, pp. 253–286.Google Scholar
  3. John Bigelow and Robert Pargeter, Science and Necessity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990.Google Scholar
  4. Jeremy Butterfield, “Against Pointillisme: A Call to Arms”, in: Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, Stephan Hartmann, Thomas Uebel and Marcel Weber (Eds.): Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation. Dordrecht: Springer 2011.Google Scholar
  5. Tian-Yu Cao, From Current Algebra Quantum Chromodynamics: A Case for Structural Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010.Google Scholar
  6. Angelo Cei and Steven French, Getting Away from Governance: A Structuralist Approach to Laws and Symmetries. Preprint PhilSci-Archive 5462 (2010).Google Scholar
  7. Anjan Chakravartty, A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable. New York: Cambridge University Press 2007.Google Scholar
  8. Michael Esfeld, “The modal nature of structures in ontic structural realism”, in: International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23, 2009, pp. 179–194.Google Scholar
  9. Michael Esfeld, “Causal realism.” This volume.Google Scholar
  10. Michael Esfeld and Vincent Lam, “Ontic structural realism as a metaphysics of objects”, in: Alisa Bokulich and Peter Bokulich (Eds.), Scientific Structuralism. Dordrecht: Springer 2011, pp. 143–159.Google Scholar
  11. Aharon Kantorovich, “Ontic Structuralism and the Symmetries of Particle Physics”, in: Journal for General Philosophy of Science 40, 1, 2009, pp. 73–84.Google Scholar
  12. David Lewis, “Ramseyan Humility”, in: David Braddon-Mitchell and Robert Nola (Eds.): Conceptual Analysis and Philosophical Naturalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 2009.Google Scholar
  13. Holger Lyre, “Holism and structuralism in U(1) gauge theory”, in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35, 4, 2004, pp. 643–670.Google Scholar
  14. Holger Lyre, “Humean Perspectives on Structural Realism”, in: Friedrich Stadler (Ed.): The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Springer 2010, p. 381–397.Google Scholar
  15. Stathis Psillos, “Adding Modality to Ontic Structuralism: An Exploration and Critique”, in: Elaine Landry and Dean Rickles (Eds.), Structure, Object, and Causality. Dordrecht: Springer (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  16. Bryan W. Roberts, “Group structural realism”, in: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2010, DOI: 10.1093/bjps/axq009.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentUniversity of MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations