Using a guide to select design strategies for behaviour change; Theory vs. Practice

  • Johannes Zachrisson
  • Gøril Storrø
  • Casper Boks

Abstract

In recent years there has been an increased focus on researching the potential environmental benefit from altering the way users interact with products. A number of strategies for how products may be designed to affect the behaviour of the user have been identified. However, there is a need for a guide that may help designers make informed decisions about which strategies to apply.

An ongoing research project at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology is aiming at creating such a guide. The initial phase of the project focused on identifying insight from social psychology regarding the factors that may affect the behaviour of a person. This is used as a framework for suggesting when different behaviour changing design strategies may be most promising. The preliminary result was a set of guidelines, proposing how information about the user or the context may give an indication of which design strategies to apply. This paper is based on the experience of working with the guidelines in a practical design project. The aim of the project was to reduce the environmental impact of behaviour related to oral healthcare, in collaboration with Philips.

Keywords

Sustainable behaviour Design guide Case study 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Thøgersen, J. and F. Ölander, Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: A panel.... Journal of Economic Psychology, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lenzen, M., et al., A comparative multivariate analysis of household energy requirements in Australia, Brazil, Denmark, India and Japan. Energy, 2006. 31(2-3): p. 181-207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jelsma, J. and M. Knot, Designing environmentally efficient services; a 'script'approach. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design, 2002. 2(3): p. 119-130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jackson, T., Motivating sustainable consumption. SDRN Briefing One, 2005.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rodriguez, E. and C. Boks. How design of products affects user behaviour and vice versa: the environmental implications. in EcoDesign 2005. 2005.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tokyo, Japan: Union of Ecodesigners. Lilley, D., V. Lofthouse, and T. Bhamra. Towards instinctive sustainable product use. in Presented at the 2nd International Conference: Sustainability Creating the Culture, 2-4th November 2005, Aberdeen Exhibition & Conference Centre, Aberdeen. 2005.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elias, E., E. Dekoninck, and S. Culley, The potential for domestic energy savings through assessing user behaviour and changes in design. In: EcoDesign 2007: 5th International Sympo- sium on nvironmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufactur- ing, 10-13 December 2007, Tokyo, Japan., 2007.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brezet, H. and C. van Hemel, EcoDesign - A promising apprach to sustainable production and consumption. 1997: United Nations Environment Programme, Industry and Environment.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lockton, D., D.J. Harrison, and N.A. Stanton, Design with Intent. 101 patterns for influencing behaviour through design v.1.0. 2010: Windsor: Equifine. 1-111.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pettersen, I. and C. Boks, User-centred Design Strategies for Sustainable Patterns of Consumption. Proceedings: Sustainable Consumption and Production: Framework for action, Brussels, Belgium. Conference of the Sustainable Consumption Research Exchange (SCORE!)Network, supported by the EU's 6th Framework Programme., 2008: p. 107.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zachrisson, J. and C. Boks, EXPLORING BEHAVIOURAL PSYCHOLOGY TO SUPPORT DESIGN FOR SUSTAINABLE BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH. Journal of Design Research, 2011. accepted.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zachrisson, J. and C. Boks. Reinforcing preliminary design strategy selection guidelines with insight from Fogg's behaviour grid. in Proceedings of Persuasive Technology 2011. 2011. Columbus, Ohio, USA.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zachrisson, J. and C. Boks, Obtrusiveness and design for sustainable behaviour, The International Journal of Consumer Studies. under review.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zachrisson, J. and C. Boks. A Framework for Selecting Sustainable Behavior Design Strategies. in Proceedings of ISSST IEEE,. 2011. Chicago, May 16th - 18th: IEEE.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klockner, C. and A. Blobaum, A comprehensive action determination model. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2010. 30(4): p. 574 - 586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jelsma, J., Designing 'moralized'products. P.-P. Verbeek and A. Slob (eds.), User Behavior and Technology Development: Shaping Sustainable Relations Between Consumers and Technologies, 2006: p. 221-231.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lilley, D., Designing for behavioural change: reducing the social impacts of product use through design.. Doctoral Thesis, Loughborough University, 2007: p. 1204.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bhamra, T., D. Lilley, and T. Tang, Sustainable use: Changing Consumer Behaviour Through Product Design. Changing the Change: Design Visions, Proposals and Tools, Turin, 2008, Proceedings, 2008.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stern, P., Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, Promoting Environmentalism, 2000. 56(3): p. 407-424.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klockner, C., Understanding the purchase of organic food - a theoretical framework from a psychological perspective. 2010: p. 1 -9.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Steen, M., J. Promotors Buijs, and H. Letiche, The fragility of human - centred design. Dissertation at Delft University of Technology, Department of Industrial design engineering, 2008.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aldersey-Williams, H., J. Bound, and R. Coleman, The Methods Lab | User Research for Design. 1999. 1-31.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Preece, J., Y. Rogers, and H. Sharp, Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. 2002: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. 519.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Courage, C. and K. Baxter, Understanding your users: a practical guide to user requirements. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, ISBN: 1-55860-935-0. 2005. 781.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Elias, E., User-Efficient Design. A Design Case Study for Industry, University of Bath, UK., 2009: p. 1-28.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fogg, B., A behavior model for persuasive design. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on persuasive technology, 2009.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fogg, B. and J. Hreha, Behavior Wizard: A Method for Matching Target Behaviors with Solutions. Persuasive Technology, 2010.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Klockner, C. and E. Matthies, Two Pieces of the Same Puzzle? Script Based Car Choice Habits Between the Influence of Socialization and Past Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Page 29 of 45, 2010: p. 1-46.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johannes Zachrisson
    • 1
  • Gøril Storrø
    • 1
  • Casper Boks
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Product DesignNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations