A Sustainability Agenda in Planning Education

Chapter
Part of the Schooling for Sustainable Development book series (SSDE, volume 3)

Abstract

Over the last two decades land use planning in Australia has openly embraced sustainability as a principal tenant. However the core of land use planning has traditionally been the management and construction of urban environments. Land use planning in rural and regional Australia has increasingly had to confront a broadening natural resource management agenda and an environmental planning imperative. This has resulted in a paradigm shift for land use planners from being expected to facilitate development to placing proposals within the context of the sustainability of the resource base. The effect has been to widen the scope for professional practice. Planning education is increasingly filled with competing interests reflecting the growing complexity of built and natural environments. The need for planning to articulate around development, natural resource management and sustainability offers a real opportunity to develop a clear social sciences agenda for sustainability at a secondary and tertiary level. This chapter explores a sustainability agenda as a critical component of planning practice, it utilises two case studies and the response of planning education to this agenda.

Keywords

Native Vegetation Planning System Murray Darling Basin Natural Resource Base Wagga Wagga 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abercrombie, P. (1959). Town and country planning (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics – Statistics New Zealand [ABS – Statistics NZ]. (2006). ANZSCO – Australian and New Zealand standard classification of occupations (ABS Cat. No. 1220.0). Canberra: Australian Government.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Government. (2001). The national action plan for salinity and water quality. Canberra: Australian Government.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities? Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 296–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chadwick, G. (1978). A systems view of planning: Towards a theory of the urban and regional planning process. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Department of Environment and Natural Resources (2011). Natural resources management. http://www.environment.sa.gov.au/dwlbc/nrm/history/nvc/native_veg_heritage.html. Accessed 4 July 2011.
  7. Gleeson, B., & Low, N. (2000). Australian urban planning: New challenges, new agendas. Sydney: Allen Unwin.Google Scholar
  8. Goodman, D. (1972). After the planners. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  9. Gunder, M., & Hillier, J. (2009). Planning in ten words or less: A Lacanian entanglement with spatial planning. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  10. Gurran, N., & Phibbs, P. (2008). Planning for sustainable change: A review of Australian local planning schemes. In T. Gilmour, E. Blakely, & R. Pizarro (Eds.), Dialogues in urban planning: Towards sustainable regions (pp. 129–152). Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hall, P. (1975). Urban and regional planning. London: Hardmondsworth.Google Scholar
  12. Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning – Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: MacMillan Press.Google Scholar
  13. Herington, J. (1989). Planning processes: An introduction for geographers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. House of Representatives Standing Committee on Science and Innovation. (2004). Science overcoming salinity: Coordinating and extending the science to address the nation’s salinity problem. Canberra: Australian Government.Google Scholar
  15. Jackson, T., & Dixon, J. (2007). The New Zealand Resource Management Act: An exercise in delivering sustainable development through an ecological modernisation agenda. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34(1), 10–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacobs, J. (1964). The death and life of the great American cities: The failure of town planning (2nd ed.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  17. Jepson, E. (2001). Sustainability and planning: Diverse concepts and close associations. Journal of Planning Literature, 15(2), 499–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Keeble, L. (1964). Principles and practice of town and country planning. London: Estates Gazette.Google Scholar
  19. McLoughlin, J. (1969). Urban and regional planning: A systems approach. London: Faber.Google Scholar
  20. Planning Institute of Australia. (2004). Findings and recommendations of the national inquiry into planning education and employment. Canberra: Planning Institute of Australia.Google Scholar
  21. Planning Institute of Australia. (2010). Accreditation policy for recognition of planning qualifications (Urban and regional planning chapter). Canberra: Planning Institute of Australia.Google Scholar
  22. Reeves, D. (2005). Planning for diversity. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  23. Robin, L. (1998). Defending the little desert: The rise of ecological consciousness in Australia. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Steele, W., & Gleeson, B. (2009). Planning in climate change: Towards a relational framework for action (Research Paper No. 26). Brisbane, Queensland: Griffith University, Urban Research Program.Google Scholar
  25. World Commission on Environment and Development [WCED]. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (General Assembly Resolution No. 42/187). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Community Planning and Development ProgramLa Trobe UniversityBendigoAustralia

Personalised recommendations