Aiming for Equity in Ethnomathematics Research

Chapter
Part of the Mathematics Education Library book series (MELI, volume 55)

Abstract

We reflect on the discourse patterns in our interactions in Mi’kmaw communities. Beginning with ethnomathematical conversations with elders and teachers, our interest in supporting cultural connections for community mathematics students turned our focus to supporting an initiative (the Show Me Your Math contest) that had students report on the mathematics they found in their communities. With this shift in positioning we observed a release from a colonialist hold on mathematics learning for students, but also noted further challenges relating to interactions among the people of the communities and the larger society. For our reflections we analyzed excerpts of the initial ethnomathematics interactions, of the conversations developing the contest, and of classroom resources that make cultural connections. This highlights important questions: To whom are students reporting their mathematics? Whose problems/needs are students addressing when they do the tasks assigned to them? How are people and communities represented in applications of mathematics introduced in school?

Keywords

Aboriginal Community Word Problem Aboriginal People Mathematics Classroom Mathematics Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barry, M., Small, M., Avard-Spinney, A., & Burnard Wheadon, L. (2000). Mathematical modeling: Book 1. Scarborough: Nelson Thompson.Google Scholar
  2. Battiste, M. (Ed.). (2000). Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cajete, G. (1994). Look to the mountain: An ecology of indigenous education. Durango: Kivaki Press.Google Scholar
  4. D’Ambrosio, U. (1985). Ethnomathematics and its place in the history and pedagogy of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(1), 44–48.Google Scholar
  5. D’Ambrosio, U. (1997). Where does ethnomathematics stand nowadays? For the Learning of Mathematics, 17(2), 13–17.Google Scholar
  6. Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1999). Positioning and personhood. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 32–51). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. DIAND. (1969). Statement of the Government of Canada on Indian Policy. Ottawa: Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development.Google Scholar
  8. Doolittle, E. (2006). Mathematics as medicine. In P. Liljedahl (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2006 annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 17–25). Burnaby: Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
  9. Dowling, P. (1998). The sociology of mathematics education: Mathematical myths/pedagogic texts. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  10. Ezeife, A. (2002). Mathematics and culture nexus: The interactions of culture and mathematics in an aboriginal classroom. International Education Journal, 3(3), 176–187.Google Scholar
  11. Gerdes, P. (1988). On possible uses of traditional Angolan sand drawings in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerdes, P. (1997). Survey of current work on ethnomathematics. In A. Powell & M. Frankenstein (Eds.), Ethnomathematics: Challenging eurocentrism in mathematics education (pp. 331–371). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gerofsky, S. (2004). A Man left Albuquerque heading east: Word problems as genre in mathematics education. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  14. Gutiérrez, R. (2007a). (Re)defining equity: The importance of a critical perspective. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 37–50). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gutiérrez, R. (2007b). Context matters: Equity, success, and the future of mathematics education. In T. Lamberg & L. Wiest (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 1–18). Stateline: University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
  16. Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (Eds.). (1999). Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Wagner, D. (2007). A framework for uncovering the way a textbook may position the mathematics learner. For the Learning of Mathematics, 27(2), 8–14.Google Scholar
  18. Herbel-Eisenmann, B., & Wagner, D. (2010). Appraising lexical bundles in mathematics classroom discourse: Obligation and choice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(1), 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Wagner, D., & Cortes, V. (2010). Lexical bundle analysis in mathematics classroom discourse: The significance of stance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(1), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. INAC. (2002). Our children – Keepers of our sacred knowledge (The final report of the minister’s national working group on education). Ottawa: Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. (http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/ps/edu/finre/bac_e.html)
  21. Indian Chiefs of Alberta. (1970). Citizens plus (red paper). Edmonton: Indian Association of Alberta.Google Scholar
  22. King, T. (2003). The truth about stories: A native narrative. Toronto: House of Anansi Press.Google Scholar
  23. Knockwood, I. (1992). Out of the depths: The experiences of Mi’kmaw children at the Indian Residential School at Shubenacadie, Nova Scotia (2nd ed.). Lockeport: Roseway.Google Scholar
  24. Lunney Borden, L. (2010). Transforming mathematics education for Mi’kmaw students through Mawikinutimatimk. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton.Google Scholar
  25. Milloy, J. (1999). A national crime: The Canadian government and the residential school system, 1879 to 1986. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.Google Scholar
  26. Morgan, C. (1998). Writing mathematically: The discourse of investigation. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  27. NSDOE. (2002). Foundation for Mi’kmaw/Miigmao language curriculum. Halifax: Nova Scotia Department of Education.Google Scholar
  28. Orr, J., Paul, J., & Paul, S. (2002). Decolonizing Mi’kmaw education through cultural practical knowledge. McGill Journal of Education, 37(3), 331–354.Google Scholar
  29. Prince, E., Frader, J., & Bosk, C. (1982). On hedging in physician–physician discourse. In R. DiPietro (Ed.), Linguistics and the professions (pp. 83–97). Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  30. Rowland, T. (1995). Hedges in mathematics talk: Linguistic pointers to uncertainty. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29(4), 327–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rowland, T. (2000). The pragmatics of mathematics education: Vagueness in mathematical discourse. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  32. Secada, W., Hankes, J., & Fast, G. (Eds.). (2002). Changing the faces of mathematics: Perspectives of indigenous people of north America. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  33. van Langenhove, L., & Harre, R. (1999). Positioning as the production and use of stereotypes. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action (pp. 127–137). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Wagner, D., & Herbel-Eisenmann, B. (2009). Re-mythologizing mathematics through attention to classroom positioning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wagner, D., & Lunney Borden, L. (2011a). Common sense and necessity in (ethno)mathematics. In K. Sullenger & S. Turner (Eds.), CRYSTAL Atlantique: A story of informal learning research in science, mathematics, and technology (pp. xx–xx). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  36. Wagner, D., & Lunney Borden, L. (2011b). Qualities of respectful positioning and their connections to quality mathematics. In B. Atweh, M. Graven, W. Secada, & P. Valero (Eds.), Mapping equity and quality in mathematics education (pp. 379–391). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationSt. Francis Xavier UniversityAntigonishCanada

Personalised recommendations